Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 11:58am
BURNED BY BAD POLLS, NETWORKS TRY RESTRAINT
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Alessandra Stanley]
On the biggest day of nominating contests ever, in the most exciting and closely watched election in years, television had to hold back. It was almost a painful sight: at times, anchors and commentators on Tuesday looked a little like children on Halloween who, after getting sick on candy one year, were forced to surrender their loot the next. News organizations were shaken by their misplaced faith in polls before the New Hampshire primary; they were humbled in 2004, when early tracking polls mistakenly suggested that Senator John Kerry would defeat President Bush. The impulse in television news is to tell viewers everything you know, as soon as you know even a piece of it. In the old days, election nights were a fierce three-network race to project a winner. Now they are increasingly about tamping down tracking poll predictions and about looking judicious and responsible. And as it turned, out, rightly so.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/us/politics/06watch.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)
Related
- Instead of Men Behaving Badly, MSNBC Strains for a Polite Primary Night
- A New Star as Campaign Programs Shuffle: The News
- Morning TV Veers From News to Frills
- A Historic Event for Women, Still Largely Covered by Men
- For Political Analysts, Ground Keeps Shifting
- News Coverage Changes, and So Does Tone of the Campaign
- For the New Face of CBS News, a Subdued Beginning
- After Previous Gaffes, Networks Mostly Take Their Time
- A Host Dials Down, and Bush Speaks Up
- US election has multicultural message for brands
- Burned Before, Networks Prove Reluctant to Name Next President Early
- Forgoing TV, Edwards Cultivates Grass Roots
- Judge Voids Measure to Bar News Exit Polls
- Democrat Edwards into MySpace, MTV campaigning
- In a Different Race, TV Web Sites Win
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

