Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:04pm
WIRETAP SHOWDOWN
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] The Senate takes up wiretapping of foreign terrorists this week, and the stakes couldn't be higher. Not only for the ability of our spooks to eavesdrop on al Qaeda, but also regarding Congressional and judicial intrusion into Presidential war powers. Some damage seems certain, but the issue is how much damage President Bush will accept. Not long ago Democrats seemed ready to move a bipartisan bill passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee last autumn. But under pressure from the anti-antiterror left, they are now bending and will try to weaken the bill on the Senate floor. Given that the House is likely to pass something far worse, the Senate debate will determine how much the U.S. ties its own hands in the fight against terrorists. By far the worst threat is an amendment from Senator Chris Dodd (D., Conn.) to deny legal immunity to telephone companies that cooperated with the government on these wiretaps after 9/11. The companies face multiple lawsuits, so a denial of even retrospective immunity would certainly lead to less such cooperation in the future.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120268886518557607.html?mod=todays_us_opinion
(requires subscription)
Related
- Spy bill to shield phone companies from lawsuits
- Bush, Dems take fight over FISA to the airwaves
- The FISA Follies, Redux
- Wiretap Politics
- Senate Deal on Immunity for Phone Companies
- Dodd Wins Fight to Block Passage of Surveillance Legislation
- GOP Unable to Force Vote on Bush Surveillance Bill
- The Wiretap Deal
- House Votes to Reject Immunity for Phone Companies Involved in Wiretaps
- Wiretap Correction
- House defeats stopgap extension of spy program
- Senate to Debate Telecom Firms' Immunity in Surveillance Role
- Wiretap Compromise in Works
- Telecoms Win Dismissal of Wiretap Suits
- CDT urges changes to wiretapping legislation
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

