Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:04am
[SOURCE: Columbia Journalism Review, AUTHOR: Paul McLeary]
[Commentary] "Family-friendly" cable tiers have the potential to do plenty of harm to small, experimental channels and programs, and to media diversity in general. Consider the fate of smaller channels, like Current TV, which is doing something genuinely new by running viewer-generated news items and documentaries. Would Current have a fighting chance under this new program? The way the system works now, large cable companies in effect subsidize smaller channels when they bundle them into their cable packages, but with this new, pure choice model, the chance of a viewer accidentally discovering interesting, new programming is cut down substantially.What's more, there's the danger of a trickle-down effect. The family plan could very well pressure cable channels into censoring some of their shows in order to make them more palatable to the family bundles -- thus reducing the already slim pickings offered for mature, thoughtful adults on cable television. And what does "family-friendly" mean, exactly, and who decides what shows are included under this broad heading?
http://www.cjrdaily.org/politics/the_best_of_several_bad_option.php
Links to Sources
Related
- The FCC, A New Starr Chamber?
- Kevin Martin Dials Up Broadband Spin
- Cable's Family Packages Temporarily Placate Lawmakers
- Cox to Roll Out Family Package
- Free the Cable Box
- Channeling Demand
- Martin Asked To Re-Examine Retrans
- PTC, CWA: Family Tier Is Insufficient
- Cable Companies Consider Family Tier
- Martin Seeks To Boost Cable Regulation
- Family Tiering Gets Technical
- Keeping Cable Diverse
- The Premium Advantage
- Not All in the Family: Pols Likely to Press Indecency
- Per-Channel Pricing Sought In Purchase Of Adelphia
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

