Originally published: October 5, 2011
Last updated: October 5, 2011 - 3:37pm
The true test of We the People, the Obama administration's online petition site, won't be how many petitions are launched through the Web page, but how well the White House is able to respond to them.
If it looks as if federal officials are ignoring the site or only issuing pro forma responses, that could undermine the operation, they said, and make people feel more alienated from their government. The White House initially promised to respond formally to any We the People petition that received more than 5,000 signatures, but after nearly three dozen petitions crossed that mark in the site's first week, the administration raised the bar to 25,000 signatures within 30 days. In a blog post announcing the change, White House New Media Director Macon Phillips called the flood of signatures "a good problem to have." A White House official told Nextgov Tuesday that the raised minimum should also be seen as evidence the White House is committed to producing well-considered responses to the most popular petitions, rather than routine responses to more petitions than it can handle.
- One-third of We the People petitions are Six Months Old
- When The People Speak Is Anyone Listening?
- Wrap Up: A Hackathon Here at the White House
- We The People Petitioners Typically Wait Three Months for a Reply
- Making We the People More User-Friendly Than Ever
- White House Drops First Names From We The People Petitions
- Here are the 30 questions the White House doesn’t seem to want to answer
- White House to respond to petition urging veto of online piracy bill
- White House Announces We the People
- Fewer online petitions posted to We the People website
- On Year Later We The People Petitioners have Mixed reviews
- A Write API for We the People
- White House issues first online petition response
- Announcing We the People 2.0 and a White House Hackathon
- We the People draws a curious crowd