Last updated: October 6, 2011 - 8:47am
[Commentary] By a 6-to-6 vote last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cleared the way for a legal challenge against a dubious legacy of the George W. Bush administration: the wiretapping of Americans’ international communications without a warrant or adequate judicial supervision in antiterrorism investigations.
The tie decision, which allowed an earlier ruling to stand, was a well-deserved setback to the Justice Department’s accountability avoidance strategy. This Catch-22 says that because the wiretaps are secret, no one knows for certain whether they have actually been tapped, and that means no one has a right to sue the government. We hope the Obama administration does not appeal to the Supreme Court, and allows the legal challenge to go forward. Given its dismal record on this matter, we are not holding our breath.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Surveillance and Accountability
- Split Decision and Barbed Comments Show a Court Deeply Divided on Wiretapping
- Spying, Civil Liberties and the Courts
- Court Affirms Wiretapping Without Warrants
- The Right to Sue Over Wiretapping
- Telecom customers may sue government over wiretapping, court says
- In '03, Hints of Skepticism by Sotomayor on Expanded Wiretapping
- Reason and Wiretaps
- House Steers Its Own Path on Wiretaps
- Wiretap Showdown
- Bush Calls For Greater Wiretap Authority
- Appeals court sends back wiretap case
- Administration Pulls Back on Surveillance Agreement
- Spy bill to shield phone companies from lawsuits
- Judges Weigh Phone Tracking
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

