Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:16pm
STIFLING ONLINE SPEECH
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] The rise of Internet journalism has opened a new front in the battle to protect free speech. A federal judge last week ordered the disabling of Wikileaks.org, a muckraking Web site. That stifles important speech and violates the First Amendment. It should be reversed, and Wikileaks should be allowed to resume operations. Much of the law governing the Internet remains unsettled. Still, the free speech burdens of closing down a journalistic Web site are just as serious as closing down a print publication, and courts should tread carefully. For now, the lawsuit appears to have backfired, bringing worldwide publicity to the documents. Enterprising Internet users have found ways to get to the site. We hope it will also educate judges and the public about the importance of giving full protection to online speech.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/opinion/21thu3.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)
Related
- Judge Reverses His Order Disabling Web Site
- Judge Shuts Down Web Site Specializing in Leaks
- Pentagon Sees a Threat From Online Muckrakers
- WikiLeaks, free speech and Twitter come together in Va. court case
- Thousands of Congressional Reports Now Available Online
- European Court Rejects Bid to Limit News on Celebrities
- CDT: Meritless Take-Down Notices Could Chill Online Free Speech
- A Win for Free Speech Online
- Court affirms Child Online Protection Act unconstitutional
- Supreme Court rejects student social media cases
- Suit against T-Mobile for text blocking heads to federal court this week
- Twitter is subpoenaed in Wikileaks affair
- EFF, Public Knowledge sue US gov over secret IP pact
- After Afghan War Leaks, Revisions in a Shield Bill
- Court: Sex Offender Facebook Ban Unconstitutional
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

