Submitted: February 22, 2008 - 9:30am
Last updated: February 29, 2008 - 5:12pm
Last updated: February 29, 2008 - 5:12pm
'IS PBS STILL NECESSARY? PBS VIEWERS SAY YES
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
PBS' The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer got more than 5,000 online responses to its question on whether PBS was still relevant, the vast majority saying an emphatic "yes," according to show spokeswoman Anne Bell. That followed a story in The New York Times with the provocative title, "Is PBS Still Necessary,” the thrust being that cable has stolen much of PBS' programming thunder.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6534271.html?rssid=193
Links to Sources
Related
- "NewsHour" receives grant for world health reports
- 'NewsHour' Faulted for Lack of Diversity
- 'NewsHour' on PBS to Get Makeover
- Lehrer Says ‘News Hour’ Money Woes Are Worst Ever
- Jim Lehrer Stepping Down as Regular Anchor
- Stressing the Web, 'NewsHour' Begins an Overhaul
- Never Mind the ‘Vast Wasteland.’ Minow Has More to Say
- Sunday morning TV talk shows need to break color barrier
- Is The New York Times Still Necessary?
- Familiar TV Anchors Move On, Hoping to Profit on Their Own
- MMTC's David Honig: Incentive Auctions Are Needed ASAP
- NewsHour Stands By Its Balance
- When the Facts of PBS Life Collide Online
- ‘NewsHour’ Changes Raise Questions at PBS
- Hard News on TV Draws Major Ratings
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

