Originally published: October 16, 2011
Last updated: October 16, 2011 - 7:05pm
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act awarded over $7 billion to build new broadband infrastructure, create public computing centers and implement broadband adoption programs. Concurrently, hundreds of millions have come from private and other public sources for broadband. Improving economic development is a driving force behind these investments. What have we accomplished for our investments, particularly in underserved urban and rural communities? It is a little early in the process, though, and only a small portion of the stimulus checks have been issued. Perhaps the more important question is, what economic outcomes can we hope to achieve in the next two or three years? My national survey of economic development professionals, conducted in partnership with the International Economic Development Council (IEDC) produced results that provide a number of clues.
- Rural economic developers appear to be well ahead of their urban counterparts in the area of planning. 58% of rural respondents either have broadband strategies and tactics worked into their economic development plans, or are writing plans currently with these elements. Only 39% of urban respondents have done the same.
- “We need a gigabit” has become the rallying call for broadband supporters everywhere; rural survey respondents say that 100 – 120 Mbps the minimum they’ll need over the next three years to impact their local economies.
- While the Federal Communications Commission and other policymakers continue to try to make a silk purse from a 4Mbps sow’s ear, economic development professionals aren’t buying it. At least 92% see no economic impact coming from this minimal “standard.”
- “Finding a job” is one of the most frequently cited personal economic benefits of broadband for low-income people. Economic development professionals rate it at the bottom of the list of potential economic outcomes.
- As expected, fiber is clearly seen as the leading broadband technology to attract businesses to a community. However, wireless is viewed as a strong contender for increasing startups.
- Not all wired broadband technologies are equal. Whereas fiber networks are clearly viewed by more people as having a greater impact than wireless on a range of economic outcomes, cable is viewed as only slightly more effective than wireless despite the industry’s PR and marketing efforts.
- Perseverance is still key. Although 19% applied and didn’t win a stimulus grant, another 11% whose communities also didn’t win kept fighting for money and got their projects funded through state or other federal grants.
- As we move well along our way into the second decade of the new millennium, 7% of respondents only have dialup as their broadband option, and 13% of rural respondents say they don’t expect to ever have broadband sufficient enough to impact economic development.
- BTOP Grant for North Central New Mexico Economic Development District
- Local Authorities Urge Full Broadband Stimulus Funding
- Feds Nearing Halfway Mark With $7.2 Billion Stimulus Funding
- $4.7 Million BTOP Grant for Nevada
- American Library Association highlights library and community impacts from Broadband Technology Opportunities Program in new report
- BTOP Evaluation Assistance Initiative
- Stimulus winner Clearwave has ambitious middle mile network plans
- UCAN taps Infinera for stimulus-funded network
- Where we're at with broadband stimulus and rural Internet access
- Adrian's telepharmacy: just one example of stimulus' positive results in rural Minnesota
- Broadband Initiatives Program: 7 Million People Connected; 25,800 Jobs
- Broadband job creation: Advice from someone who's seen it all
- Minnesota BTOP project poised for action in 2011
- The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Working for Rural Communities
- Vermont Aims For Universal Broadband, Cellular Coverage