Originally published: October 18, 2011
Last updated: October 18, 2011 - 4:07pm
A decade ago, the American Academy of Pediatrics suggested that parents limit TV consumption by children under two years of age. The recommendations were based as much on common sense as science, because studies of media consumption and infant development were themselves in their infancy. The research has finally grown up. And though it’s still ongoing, it’s mature enough for the AAP to release a new, science-heavy policy statement on babies watching television, videos or any other passive media form. Their verdict: It’s not good, and probably bad. Media, whether playing in the background or designed explicitly as an infant educational tool, has "potentially negative effects and no known positive effects for children younger than 2 years,” concluded the AAP’s report, released Oct. 18 at the Academy’s annual meeting in Boston and scheduled for November publication in the journal Pediatrics. “Although infant/toddler programming might be entertaining, it should not be marketed as or presumed by parents to be educational.”
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Kid apps explode on smartphones and tablets. But are they good for your children?
- Despite warnings, most U.S. babies watch TV
- Fast-Paced Cartoons Like SpongeBob May Harm Children’s Brains
- Texting, Surfing, Studying?
- TV Programming for Babies to Premiere Amid Criticism
- Neuroscientist: Internet, video games rewiring kids' brains
- Children and Media: Pediatricians' Monolith Myth
- Social Media and Kids
- 'Baby Einstein': a bright idea?
- Cellphones don't increase cancer risk in kids, study says
- Songs Stick in Teens' Heads
- Experts Rip 'Sesame' TV Aimed at Tiniest Tots
- TV Ads May Encourage Underage Drinking
- Cell Phone Radio Waves Excite Brain Cells
- Media Education Helps Kids "Just Say No"
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

