Last updated: March 4, 2008 - 12:22pm
RHETORIC: HIGH; ANXIETY: LOW
[SOURCE: New York Times 3/1, AUTHOR: Eric Lichtblau]
The warnings from President Bush and his senior aides have grown more urgent over the last few weeks, now that Congress has let a temporary wiretapping law expire. But there is little sign of anxiety among many intelligence and phone industry officials. Indeed, for all the heated rhetoric in Washington about the government’s wiretapping powers, the debate over what a new surveillance law should look like has little to do with the present or the future and almost everything to do with the past. At its crux, the debate is about whether Mr. Bush can give retroactive legal protection to telephone carriers that cooperated in the program of wiretapping without warrants he authorized weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a program that critics charge was illegal.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/us/01fisa.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)
Links to Sources
Related
- In Wiretap Law’s Stead, Uncertainty
- Bush Would Let Secret Court Sift Wiretap Process
- Senate Deal on Immunity for Phone Companies
- Democrats Set to Press Bush on Privacy and Terrorism
- House Steers Its Own Path on Wiretaps
- Role of Telecom Firms in Wiretaps Is Confirmed
- Patriot Act Excesses
- In Senate, a White House Victory on Eavesdropping
- G.O.P. Reaches Tentative Deal on Domestic Spying Legislation
- House approves short-term spending bill
- Bush, Dems take fight over FISA to the airwaves
- Gonzales Suggests Legal Basis for Domestic Eavesdropping
- With Power Set to Be Split, Wiretaps Re-emerge as Issue
- White House says phone wiretaps back on "for now"
- House Votes to Reject Immunity for Phone Companies Involved in Wiretaps
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

