Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 12:07am
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Rep Loretta Sanchez (D-CA)]
[Commentary] Imagine a world where the government decreed newspapers out of existence and required, instead, that you buy your news stories from individual reporters. Hard to contemplate such an Orwellian norm in modern-day commerce? Well, perhaps not. If the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission and special interests get their way, a similar heavy-handed government rule, known as a la carte regulations, would apply to the cable television industry. Under the guise of giving parents the right to decide on "family-friendly" programming, that rule would require consumers to pay a charge for every cable television channel they watch. But by imposing a new pay-per channel government regulation -- unprecedented in the annals of government regulation of television content -- the feds would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater, killing small programmers and dousing consumers with rate-increases. The FCC should abandon a la carte regulations and instead let the cable industry model continue to give audiences the reasonably priced, diverse programming they seek.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/12/16/EDGK6G8VHQ1.DTL
Related
- NCTA Statement on A La Carte
- The best argument for cable a la carte
- Free the Cable Box
- Minority Groups Oppose A La Carte
- Cable Customers' Choices Being Debated
- Booz Allen Defends Study
- Cable a la carte will give consumers less for more
- This Year's Marxist Economics
- Cable Caves, and We Pay
- FCC's 'media sharecropping' initiative
- Cable's Family Packages Temporarily Placate Lawmakers
- Not All in the Family: Pols Likely to Press Indecency
- The FCC, A New Starr Chamber?
- Industry Fiercely Opposes Unbundled TV
- Charter Chief Sees À La Carte Looming
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

