September 2008



A mini-conference • Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 8:30 a.m.
National Press Club
529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor
Washington, DC

Despite controversies swirling over issues such as Network Neutrality, media ownership and universal service, some policy observers believe that a range of reforms may attract bi-partisan consensus. These opportunities may be more likely to be realized if identified prior to the November 2008 election.

This conference of the Information Economy Project at George Mason University brings together two former chairmen of the Federal Communications Commission - William Kennard, who served under President Clinton, and Michael Powell, who served under President George W. Bush - with top former officials familiar with the agency's agenda, structure, and day-by-day operations to discuss just such possibilities for reform.

8:30 a.m. Welcome by Thomas W. Hazlett, Professor of Law and Economics, GMU

Panel I: Improving Procedures at the Federal Communications Commission
8:40 a.m.
Peter Pitsch, chief of staff to Dennis Patrick, FCC Chairman, 1987-1989
Robert Pepper, former chief, Office of Plans and Policy, FCC, 1989-2005
Ken Robinson, senior legal advisor to Al Sikes, FCC Chairman, 1989-1993
Blair Levin, chief of staff to Reed Hundt, FCC Chairman, 1993-1997
Kathy Brown, chief of staff to William Kennard, FCC Chairman, 1998-2001

Moderator: Drew Clark, Assistant Director, Information Economy Project

Panel II: A Cross-Partisan Agenda for Telecommunications Policy Reforms
9:45 a.m.
William Kennard, Chairman, FCC, 1997-2001
Michael Powell, Chairman, FCC, 2001-2005

Moderator: Amy Schatz, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal

When: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 8:30 a.m. - 11 a.m.
Where: National Press Club, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor, Washington, DC

Admission is free, but seating is limited. See IEP Web page: http://iep.gmu.edu.
To reserve your spot, please email Drew Clark: iep.gmu@gmail.com.

About the Information Economy Project:
The Information Economy Project at George Mason University sits at the intersection of academic research and public policy, producing peer-reviewed scholarly research, as well as hosting conferences and lectures with prominent thinkers in the Information Economy. The project brings the discipline of law and economics to telecommunications policy. More information about the project is available at http://iep.gmu.edu.

http://www.iep.gmu.edu/consensusfcc



Oversight of the DTV Transition - Countdown to February 2009
Senate Commerce Committee

Tuesday, September 23, 2008
02:30 PM

SR - 253

With February 17, 2009 less than five months away, the Committee will assess the Federal Communications Commission and the National Telecommunications Information Administration's efforts to promote broadcaster and consumer preparedness, as well as the recent test pilot in Wilmington, North Carolina.

http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&...



Wednesday, September 17, 2008
10:30 AM

SR - 253

The Senate Commerce Committee will hear testimony from five nominees to the Corporation's Board of Directors:
The Honorable Cheryl Feldman Halpern, Member, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board of Directors (Reappointment) (PN 1694)

The Honorable David H. Pryor, Member, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board of Directors (Reappointment) (PN 1695)

Mr. Bruce M. Ramer, Member - Designate, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board of Directors (PN 1696)

Ms. Elizabeth Sembler, Member - Designate, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board of Directors (PN 1697)

Ms. Loretta Cheryl Sutliff, Member - Designate, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board of Directors (PN 1698)

http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&...



FEC, FCC to Consider Complaints Over GOP Ads

Television stations in four states are asking the Federal Election Commission and the Federal Communications Commission for advice regarding allegations that Republicans in several Senate races are shortchanging viewers with the brevity of their stand-by-your-ad statements. The argument is over a matter of seconds, but depending on how the complaints are evaluated, the decision could cost four Republican Senate candidates hundreds of thousands of dollars. Those being challenged are Republican Sens. Norm Coleman (MN) and Gordon Smith (OR), Virginia challenger James S. Gilmore III, and Colorado candidate Bob Schaffer. TV stations received letters from Democratic challengers arguing that the statements of approval at the end of campaign ads violate election laws. Attorneys for Al Franken, the challenger in Minnesota, said Coleman's image does not appear for four seconds at the end of his spot. Attorneys for Oregon challenger Jeff Merkley said Smith's ad shows a written statement but not his image. Similar allegations were brought against Gilmore and Schaffer. As a result, the Republican candidates have "forfeited their entitlement" to discounted television advertising rates reserved for political office-seekers "for the duration of the campaign," wrote lawyer Marc Elias, who signed all four letters. That means, Elias contended, that the Republicans should have to pay the commercial rate, instead of the discounted rate.

Obama ad slams McCain for being computer illiterate

It probably was only a matter of time before Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama (IL), whose campaign has displayed its tech savvy through tactics such as aggressive online fundraising, use of social networking and texting the news of his running mate selection, hit Republican rival John McCain (AZ) for his admitted technological difficulties. The Obama campaign wielded McCain's past comments -- that he doesn't send e-mail and is computer "illiterate" -- like a blunt instrument. A biting new TV ad uses those examples to brand the 72-year-old Arizona senator as out of touch with today's world. Hitting an opponent on economic issues is standard political strategy. But going after a candidate for his skill with computers and e-mail is a new, 21st century line of attack. "John McCain travels with a laptop," said McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds. "This is a senseless tactic from Obama's campaign because they're struggling with the realization that the American people understand he is not equipped to deliver change because his record has no bipartisanship or significant legislative accomplishment in it."

Comparing the Candidates' Technology and Innovation Policies

Innovation drives long-term national economic growth and has in fact been responsible for 80 percent of the growth in the U.S. economy since World War II. This places technology and innovation squarely at the center of the issue - the economy - that voters have identified as the most important in the 2008 Presidential election. ITIF's latest report, Comparing the Candidates' Innovation and Technology Policies, finds that both Senators John McCain and Barack Obama have recognized the central role that science, technology, and innovation play in economic growth and have developed specific policy positions on these issues. The report presents one of the most comprehensive reviews of the two Presidential candidates' views on issues relating to technology and innovation, including: tax, R&D funding, education, trade, broadband, e-government, energy, and related policies.

Obama's science-tech policies top McCain's

[Commentary] John McCain has seen the future - and it looks a lot like the last decade. Over the last several years a consensus has developed among experts in technology, science, and innovation that the United States has begun to lose its historic dominance in high-tech innovation and scientific discovery. Recognizing this critical challenge, last year Sen. Barack Obama launched a thoughtful, comprehensive plan to reshape the American economy to compete in the Digital Age. His plan draws from the lessons of recent decades to change how our schools and universities educate the next generation, to invest in science and research and to modernize our telecommunications networks. Just over two months before the election, Sen. John McCain has responded with his own technology agenda. It reveals a lack of vision and more of the same failed policies of the current administration. To respond to the global competitiveness challenge, McCain's agenda rests largely on a variety of tax breaks for corporations, many of which I would support. However, McCain fundamentally misunderstands how innovation and technology emerge and how the United States became a high-tech superpower over the last half-century.

(Ms Eshoo represents the 14th Congressional District and is a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet.)

Palin's Home State Last Frontier For Tech, Too

[Commentary] Gov Sarah Palin (R-Alaska) does not have a technology track record. The Milken Institute's 2008 State Technology and Science Index used 77 indicators to judge how all 50 states rank in terms of technology. The indicators fall into five main categories: human capital investment, research and development funding, risk capital and entrepreneurial infrastructure, technology and science work force, and technology concentration and dynamism. Alaska ranking near rock bottom of the list at number 44. Gov Palin vetoed funding for wireless Internet access for Badger Road Elementary School ($20,000), Taku Elementary School ($27,000), Ticasuk Brown Elementary School ($20,000), North Pole Middle School ($10,000) and North Pole High School ($32,000). The reason in every case given for wireless cuts in the state's supplemental '08 budget: other funding options available. In this season of hyperbole, convenient omission and sincere untruths, such vetoes might easily incite venomous political attacks and indignant outrage. On the other hand, there are federal universal service E-rate and high-cost funds and the private-sector dollars that could possibly bridge the wireless divide for schools left behind because of Gov Palin's line-item vetoes.

Study: Palin gives McCain a media boost

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has helped open a pipeline of coverage for Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign, giving the GOP candidate almost 60 percent more media attention last week than Sen. Barack Obama, according to findings of a study released Thursday -- a dramatic reversal from earlier in the campaign. In fact, Palin received 10 percent more ink and airtime than Obama from Sept. 1 to Sept. 7, the study says. Since early July, the information database company LexisNexis has been tracking media coverage of McCain and Obama, evaluating thousands of print, broadcast and online stories each week. Last week marked the first time McCain has received more coverage than Obama. Before that, Obama had been averaging about one-third more stories a week than McCain. Much of last week's swing in media coverage, of course, was attributable to the GOP convention in Minnesota. But the "Palin bump" undoubtedly boosted the attention paid to the McCain campaign. Perhaps the most surprising finding from last week—at least to those who claim the media have been attacking Palin -- was that the coverage of Palin was deemed balanced.

The Attack on Oprah: A Case Study Of The Strategies of the Conservative Noise Machine

[Commentary] PalinPetition dot com may start to dominate the cable and broadcast news rounds via FOX and other conservative commentators soon. Timing will no doubt depend on focus group polling on whether Sen Obama is gaining traction or if passion about Gov Palin begins to wane. But from the current ferment in the vectors, Feld is pegging it to be next week's distraction. The fact is that the developing attack on Oprah is an excellent case study of how the Republicans manipulate both their base and the mainstream media. It also highlights what Obama and the Ds need to do to defend. It is not simply about going after smears or going negative sooner stronger or any of these things. It is to understand that the Republican strategists at this level do not wait for targets of opportunity, nor do they hitch their train to a single issue or person. It is a matter of understanding overall methods of operation and developing proactive counter-strategies rather than reactive counter strategies. Along the way, it also helps highlight the current problem with our mainstream media and illustrates how the Rs are taking advantage of the Internet in non-obvious ways.