January 2010

Discrimination on Trial, but Not on TV

[Commentary] The trial that started on Monday in San Francisco over the constitutionality of California's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage could have been a moment for the entire nation to witness a calm, deliberative debate on a vitally important issue in the era of instant communications. Instead, the United States Supreme Court made it a sad example of the quashing of public discourse by blocking the televising of the nonjury trial. There have been claims that televising the courtroom proceeding would somehow be unfair to defenders of Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative that banned same-sex marriage. They are hazy and unsubstantiated and vastly outweighed by the strong public interest in the airing of a major civil-rights issue. But the Supreme Court's majority bought the false argument.

Life For The FCC After Elimination of Title I Authority

[Commentary] Consensus is pretty strong that last week's oral argument on the Comcast/BitTorrent argument in front of the DC Circuit was an unmitigated disaster for the Federal Communications Commission. So much so that it appears that the D.C. Circuit may actually strip the FCC of any authority to "regulate the Internet."

While one would think Comcast would be cheering at the prospect of eliminating any watchdog over broadband whatsoever, they have been rather frantically backing away and insisting the FCC still has authority to impose network neutrality rules. Why the odd switch? Comcast, and most other major carriers, never wanted to eliminate FCC jurisdiction. Because while everyone wants the freedom of no rules, they also want some reassurance that if something goes wrong, someone has the authority to step in and fix it before it gets too out of hand.

While nobody likes getting a speeding ticket, most folks appreciate having a cop on the beat and rules of the road that tell you what side to drive on to avoid getting in a head on collision. The thought of no one having authority to step in if some major crisis hits, for example AT&T deciding it's tired of losing landline customers to Cox and refusing to complete its Voice Over IP calls, is rather scary to anyone who actually makes a living from having a stable, operating, interconnected global network. While an utterly unregulated Libertarian free-for-all appeals to think tank folks, it generally does not go down well with business folks.

Saving the Internet for Consumers

[Commentary] The Internet is and was always intended to be an open and neutral network.

Right now, the FCC is crafting rules that will determine whether or not it will stay that way. Thursday is the last day for the public to submit comments on the proposed rules. Because of Net Neutrality, consumers have had unfettered access to new content and ideas online; our preferences and choices have determined which new ideas succeed and which don't. Net Neutrality simply means "no discrimination," and this user-powered architecture is the reason the Internet has become such a powerful engine for consumer choice and democratic empowerment. These protections have worked brilliantly. For two decades, the Internet thrived on openness. It became a competitive market in the truest sense. Under Net Neutrality, doctoral students working out of their dorm room created Google; college students started Facebook; a Pez hobbyist invented eBay; an Israeli teenager wrote the code for instant messaging. These innovators started small and used the Internet's level playing field to become major forces in the new media marketplace. Their ideas have disrupted the status quo of information gatekeepers to usher in an era where content and consumers are king. Their success stories have shown that innovation flourishes in an open marketplace where ideas rise and fall on their own merits. Remove Net Neutrality, and this marketplace tilts in favor of the phone and cable companies that control the connection to your home. Without a non-discrimination rule they will seek to control the content that flows through that connection as well.

$7.5 Million BTOP Grant to Increase Broadband Access in Los Angeles

Commerce Secretary Gary Locke , joined by Sen Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa at the South Los Angeles WorkSource Center, announced a $7.5 million Recovery Act grant that will upgrade and expand 188 computer centers that provide the public with free broadband access to the Internet. The investment will help bridge the technological divide and improve access to job and computer training, and educational opportunities.

The grant was awarded to the Los Angeles' Computer Access Network (L.A.-CAN). The L.A.-CAN project proposes to double the number of workstations available throughout the city at public computer centers in libraries, workforce centers and youth and family centers in low-income and non-English speaking communities. The majority of the 188 proposed centers would be located in or within three miles of federal- and state-designated "Enterprise Zones."

The project proposes to:

  • Expand and upgrade free public computer centers at 73 public library locations, 43 WorkSource and OneSource job centers, and 72 recreation centers, senior centers and child care centers—connecting 35 youth and senior centers to broadband Internet service for the first time.
  • Expand broadband Internet access to vulnerable populations: 128 of the proposed centers are located in or near areas where 50 percent of the households are non-English speaking.
  • Expand broadband Internet access to low-income communities: 158 of the proposed centers are located in areas where 50 percent of the households are at low- or moderate-income levels.
  • Provide city residents with access to job and computer training and online search engines, including the library's recently-developed Job Hunting Guide.

FCC, Fox Square Off On Profanity...Again

The Federal Communications Commission and Fox went at it again Wednesday (Jan. 13) over the issue of swearing in a live broadcast, and a pair of courtroom observers said the FCC had a rough time of it.

"This was a slaughter," said Andrew Schwartzman of Media Access Project, which represents the Coalition for Creative Voices in Media and the Future of Music Coalition. Schwartzman essentially dispensed with the usual caveat that it is hard to predict judges in oral argument. "In this case there was no doubt," he said. "There was some discussion toward the end of the argument about how far to go, but all three judges were clearly ready to find that the FCC's policies are unconstitutional. Judges Rosemary Pooler, Pierre Level and Peter Hall heard the case, the same three that presided the first time around. Schwartzman said Judge Pooler was ready to say that the FCC's authority didn't extend beyond the seven dirty words of the Pacifica decision, while Judge Leval wasn't going as far as that, but signaled he thought that the FCC's policy advice was unconstitutionally vague without getting into Pacifica, while Hall was "adamant that this was unconstitutionally vague," said Schwartzman.

World's First Fair Use Day Attracts Interest ­ And Signs that Congress Doesn't Understand It

The consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge on Tuesday hosted the first-ever World Fair Use Day.

"Fair use" refers to the defense, under the copyright statute, that permits individuals and businesses to make use of others' copyrighted material under certain circumstances. The keynote speaker was Rep. Mike Doyle (D-PA), who told the attendees how Congress as a whole sees the issue of mixing and mashups ­ they don't understand it. Additionally, Doyle defended the rights of artists and reaffirmed his support of the doctrine. He also warned about actions being taken by the U.S. trade representative in the Anti-Conterfeiting Trade Agreement negotiations. And he acknowledged that many congressional officials want the process to be more transparent.

Neustar gets deal to work on movie download anti-piracy system

Neustar, formerly a division of Lockheed Martin, has been tapped by a consortium of Hollywood studios and technology companies to manage a database that would limit piracy while giving consumers the ability to watch downloaded video content on a variety of gadgets and devices.

The Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem announced this month that Neustar will operate an upcoming "digital rights locker" system, designed to let users who legally purchase movies online view that content on smartphones, laptops or the living room TV. The DECE technology, which is in the design stage, aims to give consumers more flexibility with the content they purchase while still employing digital rights management tools designed to discourage piracy. "Buy Once, Play Anywhere" is the marketing pitch; a launch date has not been announced. The technology is meant to address a market in which consumers are increasingly expecting their electronic devices to connect with multimedia services. Nintendo, for example, announced on Wednesday that it will soon be possible for Wii owners with a Netflix subscription to view movies streamed via the Web to the game console.

Neustar was created as a result of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, when consumers gained the right to take their telephone number with them if they switched carriers. The firm manages the central directory of area codes and phone numbers that make calls made across competing service providers possible.

White House seeks tech advice from corporate chiefs

The Obama administration has invited dozens of the nation's top executives to the White House on Thursday seeking tips on how the federal bureaucracy can become leaner and meaner. That means thinking of ways to cut costs and getting federal agencies to place a higher priority on better serving the public, in areas including immigration, education and the census.

White House officials are hoping to use new technologies, such as the Web and text messaging, to make that all happen. But the private sector's entrepreneurial zeal may not translate so easily to federal agencies. For example, the Census Bureau spent $600 million on a project to make its 2010 count electronic, but the effort failed and the census will be conducted by paper this year. Attendees are expected to include Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer, Craigslist founder Craig Newmark, Sprint Nextel chief executive Dan Hesse, PepsiCo chief executive Indra K. Nooyi, and Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes. The executives will break out into three working groups and then present their ideas to all attendees, including Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to Obama, and Peter Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget. (See http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-ballmer/improving-government-serv_b_...)

The government has started to implement some of the administration's ideas. It's cut nearly a dozen information technology contracts that appeared wasteful. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is using text messages to inform applicants for citizenship when their paperwork moves through the seven steps of the application process.

Tough Confirmation for E.U.'s Ex-Antitrust Chief

With her aggressive antitrust prosecutions, Neelie Kroes, the European Union's former competition commissioner, should be one of the last officeholders on the Continent who needed to prove her pro-consumer credentials. But that is exactly what Ms. Kroes, a 68-year-old Dutch economist, is expected to do Thursday when she answers questions from a committee of the European Parliament considering her nomination as commissioner for the bloc's digital agenda, which includes telecommunications and the Internet. And despite bringing the technology giants Intel and Microsoft to heel, as well as reining in Europe's largest energy and asphalt companies, support for Ms. Kroes is not a given. Despite her successful five-year tenure, which cemented Europe's position as the world's technology regulator, Ms. Kroes remains relatively unknown among many in Parliament, who play no direct role in competition cases and until now have had few dealings with her.

Roger Ailes' job safe, Fox News says

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. moved quickly Wednesday to damp speculation that Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes' future with the media giant was in doubt. "News Corp. is 100% behind Roger Ailes," News Corp. President Chase Carey said, adding, "We hope and expect he will continue to lead Fox News well into the future." The media giant looked to pour water on an Internet brush fire of stories claiming that Ailes' days at Fox News were numbered. Kicking off those reports were critical comments about Ailes made by Matthew Freud, the husband of Murdoch's daughter Elisabeth. Freud, a public relations executive whose clients have included Fox News rival CNN, suggested that others in the family shared his views.