January 2010

Google eyes electricity with new venture

Google has asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for permission to begin buying and selling electricity in federally regulated wholesale markets. Through a newly formed subsidiary -- Google Energy LLC -- the company asked to "sell electricity, energy, and related services and products ... at market-based rates." The company has no plans to become an energy seller, said Google spokeswoman Niki Fenwick, but rather is laying the groundwork to address challenges meeting its goals for renewable energy and carbon emissions through the existing electricity infrastructure

NTIA, RUS release "BroadbandMatch" to Help Prospective Broadband Applicants

The Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the USDA's Rural Utilities Service (RUS) today announced the launch of BroadbandMatch, a new online tool to facilitate partnerships among prospective applicants to the agencies' broadband grant and loan programs. The programs, funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, are intended to expand broadband access and adoption in America, helping to bridge the digital divide, create jobs, and stimulate long-term economic growth. BroadbandMatch allows potential applicants to find partners for broadband projects, helping them to combine expertise and create stronger proposals. For example, a broadband infrastructure provider might partner with community institutions, like universities, hospitals, or libraries, on a proposal to bring high-speed Internet service to their facilities. Any company, nonprofit, state or local government or expert individual interested in applying for funding under NTIA's Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) or RUS's Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) can post a profile, including key information about the contribution they can make to a broadband project, as well as search for other stakeholders whose skills and resources match their needs.

The Star Trek Guide to the National Broadband Plan

[Commentary] In the last few days, we have a promise from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski that the National Broadband Plan will be "bold." The National Broadband Plan requires a bold stroke. It requires more than a narrow view of "the art of the possible." It is not possible to grow corn, for example, simply by looking at a plot of land. Put some seeds in and some water, and the "art of the possible" changes.

Now that the FCC has requested some more time from Congress to submit its plan, it can work on redefining what it considers to be "possible," choosing from a couple of scenarios. Nothing illustrates the choice between a safe, incremental plan that will do some modest good and a bold stroke that could genuinely take this country back to digital leadership than two studies prepared for the FCC.

The plans being discussed so far deal with the already-accepted idea of converting universal service to support broadband, and rights-of-way issues, concentrating on affordability and utilization, along with fixing up set top boxes, and finding more spectrum to meet increasing demand. These are good things, and safe things, but not bold things.

Government skeptical wireless can open up broadband market

Earlier this week the Department of Justice urged the Federal Communications Commission to reallocate as much spectrum as possible for the wireless industry. Wireless, the DOJ says, is the best chance we've got at creating a more competitive broadband landscape. "Given the potential of wireless services to reach underserved areas and to provide an alternative to wireline broadband providers in other areas, the Commission's primary tool for promoting broadband competition should be freeing up spectrum," the DOJ told the FCC on Monday.

But now comes a policy letter from the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA) suggesting that the wireless fix may not be so clear cut. "Although early projections from [the] industry are encouraging, it is premature to predict when, or even whether, these wireless broadband services will provide the competitive alternatives that can benefit consumers of all services, including wireline," NTIA chief Larry Strickling wrote to the FCC. It's not like Strickling disagrees with DOJ's assessment of the problem. The fact that some wireline customers seem willing to switch to wireless service suggests that the two offerings could become part of a broader marketplace," NTIA speculates. But the letter advises the FCC keep several factors in mind. First, a big chunk of the wireless industry is owned by AT&T and Verizon. Are they really going to market their wireless products as an alternative to their wireline offerings?

Top 10 Prescriptions for Getting Broadband Done

[Commentary] 1) Develop (and act on) the best plan you can write for getting broadband without one dollar of stimulus.

2) Partner with other communities.

3) Bring medical facilities, schools, colleges and other institutions onto your team of stakeholders.

4) Inoculate against incumbents behaving badly.

5) Incumbents are going to increase the use of local legislators to enable their attacks on community broadband so actively cultivate your own legislative support to enable you to deflect these attacks.

6) Put the heat on the state agencies responsible for broadband mapping projects -- especially on states relying on Connected Nation -- to include 2nd- and 3rd-sourced, independently validated broadband usage data.

7) If you want broadband available and affordable to all, competition is how you get it, and open access is a linchpin to increased competition.

8) Let's not get Alzheimer's regarding the urban underserved.

9) Communities and public-private partnerships need to seek out traditional investors.

10) Some small towns and counties may have to suck it up and secure a broadband future on their own.

FCC Chairman To Silicon Valley: We Need Your Best Ideas

In America's complicated business landscape, Silicon Valley is not an island. The innovations that come from the famous tech hotspot have the potential to boost economies nationwide. This was the message Wednesday from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski, who addressed a group of entrepreneurs and investors at the offices of tech-blog network Giga Omni Media in San Francisco.

The Obama administration's ambitious goal of rolling out coast-to-coast broadband is not merely a plan to help Silicon Valley by better connecting the country's tech geeks. Better connectivity will be the very lifeblood of American business for decades to come, Chairman Genachowski said. "A robust, open broadband platform, available and used by all Americans, will be our engine for innovation, economic growth and job creation in the 21st century," he said.

To the tech community, Genachowski is anything but a faceless government bureaucrat. He earned his stripes in the private sector, holding a top post at IAC/InterActiveCorp. and co-founding start-up incubator LaunchBox Digital and investment firm Rock Creek Ventures. Ubiquitous broadband in America will be a crucial step in meeting some of the president's top policy goals, the chairman said, including improving healthcare, education and public safety. It will also lead to a more transparent, efficient and responsive government, he said. But the broadband rollout is already up against a significant hurdle: the availability of wireless spectrum to power the quickly evolving computers and handheld phones hitting the market.

The New FCC and a Small Reality Check

[Commentary] It is OK to be optimistic about the new Federal Communications Commission under the leadership of Chairman Julius Genachowski. The New FCC Is Curious. The New FCC Sees Value in Unlicensed Spectrum. The New FCC Views Broadband As the Platform for Basic Services. The New FCC Is Paying Attention.

Online Media Execs Have Eyes on Washington

Online entertainment and video executives and developers at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas are talking about how their future rests largely with the Federal Communications Commission.

Tim Street is the CEO of Ape Digital, a Pasadena, Calif.-based company that produces online videos. He's been watching the FCC's moves to develop a net neutrality policy that he said is important to keep the Web open like it is today so that applications like his can thrive. "I've been following because I know where my bread is getting buttered," Street said. "I can see a scenario where the 200-plus lobbyists that are fighting against net neutrality can make it so that independent online video content creators won't be able to afford an entrance fee onto the Web." Street said he is concerned about trends in the cable and satellite industry to extend their current models onto the Web. He said he is concerned about TV Everywhere, a strategy by Comcast and other cable and satellite providers to bring online content to only their subscribers of Internet and cable service. "This is a closed system and it's unclear how new video can get on to this system," Street said.

Steve Harnesberger, vice president of business development for Jaman, said potential interest by carriers such as AT&T, Verizon and Comcast to charge by how much bandwidth a user consumes is bad for consumers and could slow demand for video, which consumes the most bandwidth. Harnesberger said the business motivation is for cable and telecom carriers to get extra revenue from bandwidth usage that they would be losing from consumers who cut the cord of cable television services for only broadband Internet.

Municipal fiber needs more FDR localism, fewer state bans

[Commentary] The truth is that publicly owned networks do quite well. Communities typically borrow from outside investors to build the network and pay off the loans over a 15-20 year period with revenues from phone, television, and broadband services (for wired networks). These networks have eased telecom budgets (e.g. by increasing speed to schools while dramatically cutting costs) and encouraged economic development. Nationally, they average high take rates—a measure of how many people take service on the network. State barriers to publicly owned broadband networks may benefit monopolistic cable and telephone companies but can cripple communities within those states. Of course, such policies also give a competitive edge to cities in other states who have moved ahead.

Questions To Ask Your Policymakers About Broadband

[Commentary] What kinds of questions should we be asking candidates to raise the profile of broadband?

1. Do you agree that broadband is one of the most important infrastructures of the 21st century?

2. How do you see broadband playing a role in furthering your policy goals?

3. Are you a supporter of open government, where the Internet can be used to increase transparency, engage citizens, and drive efficiencies? If so, what are your specific plans to implement open government?

4. Do you believe that it's important for your constituents to have access to world-class connectivity in order to support continued economic development?