October 2015

Lawmakers want to fine carmakers $5,000 a day for not having a privacy policy

Cars of the future are likely to be highly advanced machines with knowledge of the driver's every decision: Do you speed? Brake too hard? Wear a seatbelt? All this information could potentially be used against you by insurers, data brokers or hackers -- potentially without your knowledge. So House lawmakers are proposing a measure, as part of a draft bill to be debated during the week of Oct 19, that would open carmakers up to fines of $5,000 a day if they don't submit a detailed privacy policy to the government.

The policies should explain what information a manufacturer collects on drivers, according to the draft text, and lay out the choices consumers have about the use of the data. The automaker would also have to pledge not to keep the driving data for any longer than is necessary for "legitimate business purposes." There are a whole slew of other requirements, such as a proposed ban on hacking into car software. (Security researchers have objected to this section over concerns it could prevent them from detecting and warning of gaps in the companies' code.) Under the draft legislation, car manufacturers could be held liable if they violate any part of their own privacy policies or if they fail to file a privacy policy to begin with. But the maximum penalty automakers face would be limited to $1 million, and they would be shielded from Federal Trade Commission scrutiny for "unfair" or "deceptive" acts related to privacy as long as their privacy policies meet all the legislation's requirements.

YouTube Will Make You Pay to See Some of Its New Videos

YouTube, the world’s biggest video site, is readying a slate of programming that will only be available to people who join its upcoming subscription services. YouTube will announce some of that programming, which it is helping to fund, on Oct 21. Industry sources say the programming is the product of an initiative the site announced in 2014, when YouTube said it would “fund new content from some of our top creators." At the time, YouTube didn’t say that stuff it was funding would be placed behind a paywall. But industry sources say the site now intends to use at least some of the content it is bankrolling as a bonus for its premium subscription service, which will also include features like ad-free videos.

YouTube will continue to operate a free, ad-supported version of the site, and has said that all of the videos that appear on the free site will be available on its paid version -- which is why YouTube is insisting that all video makers who make money from YouTube ads need to participate in the subscription service as well.

China still trying to hack US firms despite Chinese President Xi’s vow to refrain, analysts say

Chinese government hackers have attempted in the past few weeks to penetrate the networks of US companies to steal their secrets despite a pledge by Chinese President Xi Jinping that they would not do so. Chinese hackers have targeted at least seven US companies since President Xi vowed in September that his country would not conduct economic cyberespionage -- the theft of trade secrets and intellectual property for the benefit of the nation’s industries.

In the three weeks since President Xi left Washington -- including the day after he left, on Sept. 26 -- hackers linked to the Chinese government have attempted to gain access to tech and pharmaceutical companies’ networks, said Dmitri Alperovitch, CrowdStrike co-founder and chief technology officer, who released a report on the issue. The efforts continue to the present, sometimes several times a day, and appear to be distinct from traditional intelligence gathering, which is not covered by President Xi’s pledge, Alperovitch noted. The US intelligence community is also seeing continued signs of economic cyberespionage by Chinese hackers, apparently.

Cablevision drops TV bundle lawsuit against Viacom

Cablevision has dropped a two-year-old lawsuit against Viacom that accused the channel operator behind MTV, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central of charging it exorbitant fees if it did not also carry less popular channels like Logo and Palladia. The companies said in a joint statement they had resolved the legal fight and were "entering into mutually beneficial business arrangements."

Cablevision, which has agreed to be bought by European telecommunications giant Altice for $17.7 billion, argued in its March 2013 suit that Viacom abused its market power and coerced it into taking channels it didn't want. While neither company would comment on the settlement, the new deal comes amid a broad ratings decline for traditional TV channels that has caused New York-based Viacom shares to fall 34 percent in 2015.

AT&T and Verizon Plot Different Strategies to Develop Video Business

Investors will get fresh insight into old telecommunication’s new media strategies when Verizon and AT&T report quarterly results. The two companies have long resembled each other but they are on different paths to find growth in the video business. AT&T made a bet on television with its $49 billion purchase of DirecTV in July that vaulted it to become the largest pay-TV company in the U.S. Verizon is building out a mobile video service, costing at least a few hundred million dollars, called go90 to target millennials. While AT&T pursues a satellite-based business, Verizon is sticking to its knitting by focusing on wireless.

Chief Executive Lowell McAdam has ruled out an AT&T-like strategy saying the company isn’t interested in buying the television business of DirecTV’s rival Dish Network. Instead, Verizon recently launched its own stand-alone wireless video service -- which was preceded by a number of deals including the $4.4 billion acquisition of AOL. Wall Street is eager to hear any adoption and usage details, along with plans to get more content on the app when Verizon reports its third-quarter results on Oct 20. “For the first time we are seeing a divergence in strategy,” says Barclays analyst Amir Rozwadowski. Wall Street, he says, is still learning about their tactics and the companies’ relevant milestones along the way. “We are trying to distill what is success,” he says. Both strategies have been hit with questions on whether the hulking telecom companies possess the nimbleness needed to navigate rapidly shifting video-consumption habits.

Publishers Straddle the Apple-Google, App-Web Divide

Apple wants mobile devices to be filled with apps. Google supports a world where people browse the web for most things. Now websites are increasingly caught in the middle of those competing visions. The Internet was supposed to be a place where billions of potential users could be reached in one place, simply and inexpensively. But as Apple focuses on apps and Google pushes the mobile web, businesses are grappling with a fragmenting online world.

The competing strategies have made it particularly tough for publishers, which straddle apps and the web more than most mobile categories. That is because publishers tend to use apps to cater to the most loyal users and use the web to be found by new readers. As a result, many have invested lots of time and money on a website and an app, which is a huge burden for small publishers that cannot afford a large technology staff.

Week ahead: FCC to vote on prison phone call reforms

The Federal Communications Commission will vote to cap the price that phone companies can charge inmates to make a call. The order, which is expected to be approved, will likely lead to a decrease in phone charges for prison and jail inmates, whose calling costs tend to far exceed the rates paid by the general public. Commissioner Mignon Clyburn of the Federal Communications Commission has worn the mantle of lowering prison call rates in recent years. She received a boost from more than a dozen Democratic Senators who endorsed the order, which includes a plan to discourage what Senators characterized as "kickbacks," money phone companies usually pay prisons to win exclusive phone service contracts. "Unfortunately, in many cases state prisons can receive a commission or 'kick-back' from contracts with phone service providers, thus incentivizing a regime in which prisons profit from charging inmates higher rates," the Senators wrote in a letter to the FCC.

Under the order, the majority of prison inmates would not be charged more than 11 cents per minute for any call, a more than 50 percent cut from the current cap on interstate calls. Other service charges would be capped as well. The FCC is also setting its sights on the commissions that prison phone companies generally fork over to prisons upfront. The order would not ban that practice but "strongly discourages" it, according to a fact sheet.