Monday, July 19, 2021
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
Customers facing issues with ISPs amid Emergency Broadband Benefit rollout
Digital Equity
Broadband Infrstructure
Broadband Data
Platforms/Social Media
Wireless
Security
Privacy
Labor
Lobbying
Policymakers
Stories From Abroad
Digital Equity
Millions of people signed up for the Federal Communications Commission‘s Emergency Broadband Benefit (EBB) program since it launched in mid-May—but records show that Americans faced significant frustrations with their internet service providers amid the rollout. While hundreds of providers agreed to be part of the EBB, customers of nearly every provider say issues have cropped up along the way. Customers told the FCC how providers said the EBB didn’t apply to their current service plans, explained how they had issues with providers accepting their applications, and noted they waited months to have their applications approved by providers. The FCC said it was “aware of problems some consumers are having and have been working with both [Universal Service Administrative Company (the program administer)] and participating providers to make this process smoother for consumers.” While the process may be more streamlined with the recent changes, experts say that it’s likely the 1,000 complaints filed with the FCC were only a portion of the problems people are facing.
Governor JB Pritzker and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) announced the first cohort of grant recipients as part of the Office of Broadband Regional Engagement for Adoption and Digital Equity (READY) program. Through this first of its kind program, $200,000 has been awarded to four regional entities to accelerate progress toward eliminating the digital divide. The inaugural READY cohort is fueling local efforts in four major regions throughout Illinois, including East Central, Northern Stateline, Southeastern, and Southern Illinois. The program is one of an increasing robust Digital Equity Package offered by the Illinois Office of Broadband to increase access, adoption and utilization of high-speed internet access--all through the lens of digital equity and inclusion. To further these efforts across all ten economic development regions of the state, the Office of Broadband is launching the next READY notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) June 16, with another $250,000 available for grants. The initial cohort of READY grantees includes awards of $50,000 for the following entities:
• Eastern Illinois University on behalf of the Southeastern Region
• Region 1 Planning Council on behalf of the Northern Stateline Region
• Southern Illinois University on behalf of the Southern Region
• University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign on behalf of the East Central Region
The Broadband READY program is part of a comprehensive Digital Equity Package announced by Governor Pritzker in Fall 2020 to boost broadband capacity while addressing existing broadband equity gaps. The program and other investments to enhance community planning and equitable implementation will complement the Governor's Connect Illinois program, a $400 million plan to deliver universal access to high-speed internet statewide. A second round of READY grants are now available, with a deadline of October 4, 2021, to apply.
Broadband Infrastructure
Acting FCC Chair Rosenworcel says 5G midband spectrum key to closing digital divide
Jessica Rosenworcel, acting chairperson of the Federal Communications Commission, said that the key to helping close the digital divide is to focus on 5G midband spectrum, not millimeter wave. She said that the FCC made a mistake a few years ago when it focused all of its energy in the early 5G days on millimeter wave.
Wireless Infrastructure Association CEO Jonathan Adelstein is feeling “very encouraged” by recent Capitol Hill machinations over how to structure the $65 billion chunk of the bipartisan infrastructure deal intended to close the digital divide. He cited recent rumblings that lawmakers may ultimately opt for lower minimum internet speed requirements than what Democrats had previously hoped for. Democrats had wanted to require super-fast download and upload speeds of 100 Megabits per second — speeds Adelstein and others warned would only allow for more expensive fiber-optic buildout and would effectively prevent cable, satellite and wireless companies from competing for subsidies. But Adelstein now suggests senators are looking at making the speed requirements 100 Mbps download and just 20 Mbps upload, well within the range wireless companies can offer. “Both [fiber and wireless] are part of the solution,” he said. “It’s a dangerous time to experiment with putting all our eggs in a single fiber basket.”
In New York, like most big cities, the wealthier a neighborhood is, the more options for internet service its residents probably have — and the more incentive for providers in those areas to compete on service and price. On some blocks on the Upper West Side, residents can choose among four carriers. In Brownsville, customers can choose between Altice or Optimum — which is owned by Altice. Verizon’s fiber-optic service, Fios, is supposed to be available on every city block, which in theory would spur more competition, but that has yet to happen. While a fiber connection remains the gold standard, “fixed wireless” options can deliver a signal that is plenty strong for most residential uses and usually much faster and cheaper to deploy. NYC Mesh is one of many fixed-wireless outfits in New York City. NYC Mesh has a subsidized option for installations, and members pay a suggested monthly donation of $20 to $60. Other options range from community-owned models — like the D.I.Y. “internet in a box” efforts led by the digital justice organization Community Tech NY, and the internet cooperative People’s Choice, started by former Spectrum strikers — to smaller for-profits like Starry, a Boston-based start-up rolling out flat-rate internet plans of $50 a month in large urban markets including New York City.
The California legislature unanimously approved a plan to build a statewide, open-access fiber network. The legislation was supported by Democrats and Republicans in votes of 78-0 in the California Assembly and 39-0 in the state Senate. The statewide, open-access fiber lines will function as a "middle-mile" network that carries data from Internet backbone networks to connection points in cities and rural areas. A middle-mile network doesn't extend all the way to residential properties, but "last-mile" ISPs can get access to it and focus on building infrastructure that connects the middle mile to homes. California's decision to make the middle-mile network open-access means it will provide "non-discriminatory access to eligible entities on a technology and competitively neutral basis, regardless of whether the entity is privately or publicly owned," the bill text said. If all goes as planned, the network will make it easier for existing ISPs to expand and for new ISPs to get started, filling in gaps where there's no modern access and boosting competition and speeds in other areas. Last-mile ISPs could use network technology other than fiber to connect to homes because of the provision allowing technology-neutral access. The state is providing $3.25 billion to build the middle-mile network and it doesn't stop at the middle mile. While the package won't build an open-access last-mile network, it provides $2 billion in funding for last-mile ISPs to serve more homes.
Virginia Governor Ralph Northam (D) is announcing a $700 million plan to achieve universal broadband accessibility across Virginia by 2024, a historic investment in broadband for a state long beset by a digital divide. Northam and Sen Mark R. Warner (D-VA) will meet in Abingdon with legislative leaders June 16 to unveil their proposal for spending a portion of the state’s $4.3 billion in federal coronavirus relief funding under the American Rescue Plan. According to Northam, the state has 233,500 homes, businesses and other locations without access to broadband. The $700 million investment would accelerate the Virginia's goal of deploying broadband infrastructure by 2028 to these underserved areas, pushing it to 2024. Most of the connections would be established within the next 18 months. Virginia is on track to be one of the first states in the nation to achieve universal broadband service; in the past three years, the state has connected over 140,000 locations and made $100 million in investments to a public-private partnership with Virginia Telecommunication Initiative, aiming to provide financial assistance to extend broadband service to areas unserved by a provider. Additionally, through a program established in 2019 by Northam and the General Assembly, more than 13,000 homes and businesses were connected to high-speed Internet.
Frontier Communications is advancing its fiber deployments in pockets of the US. The company said that as part of the initial phase of its multi-year expansion efforts it’s deploying fiber broadband connections past an additional 280,000 consumers in Connecticut and an additional 24,000 consumers in San Angelo (TX) in 2021. Frontier is positioning its fiber service as an alternative to cable, saying it provides “uploads up to 25X faster than our cable competitors," and plans to double its fiber network to ultimately cover more than 6 million homes and businesses. In 2021, it plans to extend its fiber to pass 495,000 more locations. With their announcement of more than 300,000 new fiber passings in Texas and Connecticut, it’s made a big stride in its 2021 goal. Frontier’s network, comprised of fiber and copper connections, currently spans 25 states.
It is critical that the truth about open-access municipal broadband networks be told: They work; they are successful; they spur competition; they are closing the digital divide. They also are an irritant to big cable and its allies, whose henchmen have been busy at work in a well-financed lobbying campaign. Municipal fiber is hugely successful in Utah, even in his own district. In fact, Utah, one of the most politically conservative states in the nation, has more municipal broadband networks than elsewhere in the US. And we at UTOPIA Fiber, a municipal network owned by 11 cities, now provide fiber-to-the-home services in 17 cities and business services in 50, connecting communities to residential speeds of up to 10 Gigabits per second (Gbps), and 100 Gbps for business, both the fastest speeds currently offered in the United States. Though UTOPIA Fiber is publicly owned, it creates private-sector competition.
[Roger Timmerman has been executive director/CEO of the Utah Telecom Open Infrastructure Agency (UTOPIA) Fiber since 2016.]
The Federal Communications Commission's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB), the Office of Economics and Analytics (OEA), and the Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) are implementing the requirements of the Broadband DATA Act to improve the FCC's data on broadband availability. To implement the Broadband DATA Act’s requirements and obtain better mobile broadband availability data, these Bureau and Offices are developing: (1) technical requirements for a challenge process that will enable consumers and other third parties to dispute service providers’ coverage data; (2) a process to verify service providers’ coverage data; and (3) a process to accept crowdsourced information from third parties. These measures will enable the FCC, Congress, other federal and state policymakers, Tribal entities, consumers, and other third parties to verify and supplement the data collected by the FCC on the status of broadband availability throughout the United States.
The FCC seeks comment on proposed technical requirements to implement the mobile challenge, verification, and crowdsourcing processes required by the Broadband DATA Act. These requirements include the metrics to be collected for on-the-ground test data and a methodology for determining the threshold for what constitutes a cognizable challenge requiring a provider response. This Public Notice also provides tentative views and seeks comment on the types of data that likely will be probative in different circumstances for validating broadband availability data submitted by mobile service providers.
[WC Docket No. 19-195. Filing deadlines pending Federal Register publication]
On May 3, Rep Bob Good (R-VA) wrote to Acting Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel with a request for a handful of information:
- Current broadband maps are primarily based on information received from providers. What processes are in place to ensure the highest accuracy in reporting this information?
- A more granular broadband map can help identify more accurately where broadband is available, but only if a meaningful and robust challenge process is implemented to validate both fi xed and mobile data prior to any map being used by the FCC or RUS (or any other governmental agency) to make funding or financing decisions. What steps are being taken to ensure a challenge process is in place to help validate mapping data?
- What is being done to help ensure proper mapping collaboration between federal agencies?
- Certain federal broadband maps do not capture deployment in progress, even when it is occurring pursuant to governmental initiatives like the FCC's Universal Service Fund or Rural Utilities Service (RUS) lending/grant programs. When will the mapping be updated to incorporate ongoing deployment of broadband services?
- Congress recently passed the Broadband DATA Act to address the accuracy and the challenge process issues noted above. What is the status of implementing the new map, and will the FCC and USDA consider utilizing the updated map to maximize coordination between your agencies?
On July 8, Chairwoman Rosenworcel replied recapping broadband activities initiated since she rose to FCC chair including the formation of the Broadband Data Task Force to coordinate and expedite the design and construction of new systems for collecting and verifying broadband deployment data, hiring a data architect and design firm to work with the FCC’s own data and IT systems specialists to assess our existing data and mapping systems; and conducting a Request for Information (RFI) process to jump-start FCC contracting for the creation of the Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric, a common dataset of all locations in the United States where fixed broadband internet access service can be installed.
President Biden’s attack on Facebook followed months of mounting private frustration inside his administration over the social-media giant’s handling of vaccine misinformation, according to US officials, bringing into public view tensions that could complicate efforts to stop the spread of Covid-19. The false narratives that Covid-19 vaccines result in widespread death and that the U.S. government is mandating vaccines more than doubled across the major social-media platforms within the past three months, according to Zignal Labs Inc. Others include false claims that vaccines are really microchips and that vaccines change people’s DNA, the media-analytics firm said. Administration officials have suggested they have few concrete policy options for cracking down on the misinformation—aside from publicly pressuring social media firms. The administration’s confrontational approach marked a shift for Mr. Biden and his team, which began meeting with social-media companies during the presidential transition in a bid to strengthen protections against misinformation. But in recent months, the behind-the-scenes discussions with Facebook grew increasingly unproductive, according to the officials, who said they were unsatisfied with the company’s responses to their requests for more information about how it was responding to the influx in misinformation. Convinced that private negotiations had little hope of success, senior Biden administration officials decided to ratchet up public pressure on Facebook amid growing concern in the White House with the slowing pace of vaccinations and the spread of the highly transmissible Delta variant.
House Republicans launched a GOP caucus on Big Tech, seeking to build support for antitrust changes despite a divide among Republicans. The "Freedom from Big Tech Caucus" is co-chaired by House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee top Republican Ken Buck (R-CO) and Rep Lance Gooden (R-TX), and counts Rep Madison Cawthorn (R-NC) as a vice chair. Reps Burgess Owens (R-UT) and Paul Gosar (R-AZ) are also founding members. The caucus will seek to "educate Republican members about the abuses of Big Tech," garner Republican interest in antitrust reform, and discuss "political censorship" by tech platforms according to a memo from Rep Buck. The caucus comes after Republican leader Jim Jordan (R-OH) outlined an "agenda" for Judiciary Republicans that includes proposals such as speeding up consideration of Big Tech antitrust cases in court and consolidating antitrust enforcement within the Justice Department. Buck is a Judiciary Republican, but is charting his own path rather than falling in line with the Jordan approach; growth in his new caucus will reveal whether Republicans will follow him.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021