Wednesday, July 7, 2021
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
LA Times Editorial: Close the digital divide, but don’t trap people in the slow lane
Do hotspots improve student performance?
NC Governor Cooper Establishes Nation's First Office of Digital Equity and Literacy
Broadband Infrastructure
News From the States
Government Services
Wireless
Education
Health
Platforms/Social Media
Security
Kids and Media
Agenda
Policymakers
Stories From Abroad
Broadband Infrastructure
The United States Department of Agriculture is investing $21 million to provide broadband service in rural areas in New York without sufficient access to broadband. This investment is part of the $550 million Congress allocated to the second round of the ReConnect Program. Empire Long Distance Corporation will use an $11.3 million ReConnect grant to deploy a fiber-to-the-premises network. This network will connect 11,341 people, 96 farms, 42 businesses and a school to high-speed broadband in Livingston County, New York. Madison County will use a $10.1 million ReConnect grant to deploy a fiber-to-the-premises network. This network will connect 2,170 people, 50 farms and 30 businesses to high-speed broadband in Madison County, New York.
Although Republicans recoiled when President Biden unveiled his sweeping infrastructure plan in March, a bipartisan group of senators has thrown its support behind one of the less conventional ideas in the package: making a massive investment in broadband networks. But as crucial as these networks are to the 21st century economy, it’s not just the amount Congress spends that matters. It’s making sure the money is spent the right way. And there’s a split among lawmakers over whether to just help telecom companies extend broadband to the 21 million or more Americans with no access to it — largely but not exclusively in rural and remote areas — or to also upgrade areas with substandard service. It comes down to a question of priorities. Here’s one all taxpayers should embrace: Make sure that the new networks built with these dollars won’t grow quickly obsolete.
By taking steps to invite competitors into markets, state and local governments could help hold down broadband prices while increasing investment. That’s what happened when Google rolled out its fiber-based service. More competition will also help with the third top priority, affordability. But that’s just part of the answer. Another piece is to make sure that new networks built with federal help offer discounted service to the low-income consumers in their communities. And for communities with existing networks, there needs to be a permanent subsidy program for low-income households.
Nearly one-fourth of American households lack broadband access. A water main breaks every two minutes. With child-care costs soaring, more than 1 million workers—largely women—have been driven out of the economy, even as the economy reopens. Are Democrats ready to act? That is the critical question as Congress returns from its holiday break. While President Biden is selling the bipartisan infrastructure deal as a “generational investment,” the real effort will come from using the budget reconciliation process to pass vitally needed public investments with Democratic votes only. The Republicans' imprint on the bipartisan infrastructure deal makes it clear just how counterproductive they would be; Republican negotiators demanded that, even though the needs of the country are far greater than what the president called for, any package to address those problems had to be far smaller. The $579 billion in spending reduces to $116 billion a year, or roughly $2.3 billion per state per year. That won’t come close to addressing what the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates is a $2.5 trillion investment gap in basic infrastructure alone—roads, bridges, water systems, electric grid, etc.—which does not even include other priorities such as upgrading our rail and broadband networks.
News from the States
Governor Cooper Establishes Nation's First Office of Digital Equity and Literacy
Governor Roy Cooper today announced the creation of a new Office of Digital Equity and Literacy, a first for North Carolina and the first in the nation. The office is part of the newly created Division of Broadband and Digital Equity within the North Carolina Department of Information Technology (NCDIT), elevating Gov Cooper's priority to close the digital divide in North Carolina. NCDIT Secretary Jim Weaver has named Nate Denny as the new Deputy Secretary of Broadband and Digital Equity. Jeremy Collins, who served as director of the NC@High Speed initiative in Gov. Cooper's Hometown Strong office, will lead the Office of Digital Equity and Literacy. NCDIT's expanded Broadband and Digital Equity division will be charged with executing Gov Cooper's plan to expand digital literacy offerings and partnerships across North Carolina, including spending $165 million on efforts to achieve digital equity and literacy for all North Carolinians. It will also lead the Digital Equity and Inclusion Collaborative and promote the NC Digital Inclusion Playbook for local municipalities.
Internet connectivity in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom is downright medieval by modern telecommunication standards. With the exception of a handful of homes in more densely populated communities, the only choice for most folks living in the rural environs of the Northeast Kingdom is between DSL and satellite. That’s all changing now thanks to one of the state’s nascent Communication Union Districts (CUD), enabled by a 2015 Vermont law that allows two or more towns to join together as a municipal entity to build communication infrastructure. These local governmental bodies were formed to help the state reach its goal of having universal access to broadband by 2024, and many are well on their way to securing fiber-to-the-home networks which will drastically change Northern Vermont's connectivity landscape.
The southwest corner of New Hampshire will be blanketed with fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) networks over the next two years, as 16 communities are drawing up plans to enter into public-private partnerships to boost high-speed Internet access in the state. According to New Hampshire’s Southwest Region Planning Commission (SWRPC), six more cities have also issued warrant articles indicating their interest in partnering with a private Internet service provider (ISP) to improve insufficient connectivity. Most of the cities are considering partnerships with Consolidated Communications. Towns voting to issue municipal bonds will execute a 20-year contract under which they own the network and Consolidated maintains, operates and monitors the network. When the 20-year contract ends, each town will be able to renew the contract with Consolidated or request bids for a new network operator. Though the public-private partnership model seems to be serving many well, New Hampshire’s municipalities are able to explore a variety of regional models for broadband improvement thanks to H.B. 1111, legislation passed last year allowing for the creation of Communications Union Districts.
While the digital divide is now a globally understood phenomenon, service designers are still designing and building public technology systems that depend on the internet, preferencing the well-connected and embedding the digital divide. The tendency to design services for the internet—in both technology adoption and in the services that depend on them—are the digital services design divide. Service by service, the people underserved by technology are categorically and cumulatively marginalized by public services. The more public services focus on digitization as the next step in their evolution without proactively addressing the digital service design divide, the more digitization disconnects the least connected. Ultimately, the digital services design divide is both immediately addressable and the kind of small, cumulative harm that can feel impossible to bridge.
[Sean McDonald is the co-founder of Digital Public and a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation.]
A coalition including Charter Communications, WISPA and public interest groups wrote a letter to the Federal Communications Commission urging the agency to reject proposals to increase power limits in the shared Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band, saying it would favor macro cell deployments only and jeopardize existing deployments. Other signatories voicing strong opposition to changes in the band include the Open Technology Institute, Public Knowledge, the Consortium for School Networking, and the Schools, Health & Libraries (SHLB) Coalition. The 3.5 GHz CBRS band has a unique sharing paradigm that includes incumbent federal operations, priority access licenses (PALs), and general authorized access (GAA). The band was designed with lower power limits, as well as smaller county-sized licensing scheme for PALs. The coalition asserts that allowing higher powered operations would “fundamentally alter the nature of CBRS” and the objective to create a flexible band for a variety of use cases. It pointed to existing deployments using CBRS to provide rural broadband, IoT deployments in factories, and private networks delivering connectivity to schools and libraries. Fixed wireless networks in rural areas could be impacted, the groups said, as providers wouldn’t be able to take advantage of higher power levels in part because existing user equipment doesn’t support it.
Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, communities and schools recognized that students without Internet access at home are at a disadvantage. However, an overlooked aspect of this disparity is that many students also lack a desktop or laptop computer at home. Disconnected students likely benefit if they are given free Internet; however, their school performance may still suffer if they are limited to completing assignments on a smartphone. This project randomly assigned 18 disconnected students into three groups—Internet, Internet + laptop, and control—and followed their educational outcomes pre-and post-intervention. We find evidence that providing both Internet access and a computer results in improved academic attainment, but providing only Internet access does not. This is an important finding since most policies to date have focused explicitly on the Internet provision component.
[Brian Whitacre is a Professor and Jean & Patsy Neustadt Chair in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University. Amanda Higgins is a graduate student in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University.]
The Federal Communications Commission is seeking nominations for membership on the Communications Equity and Diversity Council (CEDC). Following consultation with the General Services Administration, the FCC has renewed the charter of the Advisory Committee on Diversity and Digital Empowerment under a new name, the Communications Equity and Diversity Council, for a period of two years from the charter renewal date of June 29, 2021. The mission of the CEDC is to make recommendations to the FCC on advancing digital equity for all people of the US, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability. In carrying out this mission, the CEDC will make recommendations to the FCC on how to accelerate the deployment of high-speed Internet access, or “broadband,” in all communities by reducing and/or removing regulatory barriers to infrastructure and investment, and by making recommendations on how to strengthen existing broadband networks and develop new ones. The FCC is particularly interested in receiving nominations and expressions of interest from individuals and organizations listed here All nominations should be received by the Commission as soon as possible, but no later than 11:59 PM EDT, August 10, 2021.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021