*** We're off tomorrow to celebrate Veteran's Day. Hope you are doing the=20
same. See you Friday. ***
TODAY'S QUESTION: If Jonathan Adelstein were a baseball card, would he be a=
=20
Mickey Mantle rookie card? (see story below)
VONAGE/VOIP NOT SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATION, FCC RULES
Vonage Not Subject to State Regulations Governing Telephone Companies
FCC Further Deregulates Net Calls
Telecom Turnaround
MORE FROM FCC
Adelstein=92s Renomination Could Move With Judges
NAB to Fight 'Local' Sat Radio
CE Seeking Changes in DTV Tuner Phase-in on 25"-36" Sets
Monitoring Nationwide Broadband Rollout
Public Safety Access to the Latest Broadband Technology
E-RATE
eRate Flows Again -- '04 Apps Still Pending
2005 Application Window to Open Dec. 14
MEDIA
Pubcasters Hope to Retain =91Strong=92 Bipartisan Support in Senate
From Florida to Fallujah: What the News Coverage Covers Up
QUICKLY
2004 ITU World Telecommunications Standardization Assembly
New Study Release: Untold Stories
Patrick Ross to Progress & Freedom
Iranian Internet Journalists Face Trial Next Week
Net Access Could Knock Down Barriers to Freedom in Iraq
MORE VONAGE COVERAGE/REACTION
VONAGE/VOIP NOT SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATION, FCC RULES
VONAGE NOT SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATIONS GOVERNING TELEPHONE COMPANIES
The FCC declared that a type of Internet telephony service offered by=20
Vonage called DigitalVoice is not subject to traditional state public=20
utility regulation. DigitalVoice customers can use their phones from a=20
broadband connection anywhere in the world, making it difficult to=20
determine whether a call is local, interstate or international in nature=20
and, the FCC ruled, precluding dual state and federal regulatory regimes.=20
The Commission also stated that other types of IP-enabled services, such as=
=20
those offered by cable companies, that have basic characteristics similar=20
to DigitalVoice would also not be subject to traditional state public=20
utility regulation. The decision makes clear that the FCC, not the state=20
commissions, has the responsibility and obligation to decide whether=20
certain regulations apply to IP-enabled services. The Commission has the=20
power to preempt state regulations that thwart or impede federal authority=
=20
over interstate communications. The Commission also found that regulations=
=20
that would have been imposed by the Minnesota Commission were inconsistent=
=20
with the FCC's deregulatory policies, and that preemption was consistent=20
with federal law and policies intended to promote the continued development=
=20
of the Internet, broadband and interactive services.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254112A1.doc
FCC FURTHER DEREGULATES NET CALLS
The FCC ruled that states are now barred from imposing telecommunications=20
regulations on Internet phone service providers, which treat calls no=20
differently than any other application on the Internet. A representative=20
for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners said the=20
states are focusing now on a court hearing in mid-November in which=20
Minnesota utility regulators will argue they have a right to oversee Vonage=
=20
and other Net phone service providers. The state is seeking to overturn a=20
ruling that states cannot subject VoIP providers to their rules. FCC=20
Chairman Powell and two of the four FCC commissioners suggested Tuesday=20
that states still have a role to play -- to protect consumer interests. But=
=20
that may not mollify state utility regulators, who have joined the "growing=
=20
chorus of people" criticizing the FCC for taking a piecemeal approach to=20
VoIP regulation.
CommDaily reports that FCC Wireline Bureau Chief Jeffrey Carlisle told=20
reporters the Commission acted now on the jurisdiction issue, rather than=20
waiting for action on
the broader IP-Enabled Services proceeding, because the upcoming court=
hearing.
By acting now, the FCC adds its expertise to the court=92s deliberation,=20
Chief Carlisle said.
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR:Ben Charny]
http://news.com.com/FCC+further+deregulates+Net+calls/2100-7352_3-544488...
ml?tag=3Dnefd.top
FCC Finds Vonage Not Subject to State PUC Regulation
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Edie Herman]
(Not available online)
TELECOM TURNAROUND
[Commentary] Yesterday's ruling is the first time the FCC has exempted an=20
Internet voice service from state regulation. If there ever was a candidate=
=20
for national regulation under the Constitution's Commerce clause, this is=20
it. Our telecom network spans the country and is operated by national=20
companies, yet it is still regulated by 50 mini-dictators known as state=20
utility commissions. Charged with protecting the "public interest," these=20
busybodies have a license to micromanage every firm that's ever conjured up=
=20
a dial tone. The resulting web of regulation has retarded innovation and=20
growth. The ruling allows the FCC to sit back and watch the technology=20
grow. More good news, the editorial ends, is that Democratic Commissioner=20
Jonathan Adelstein -- a former Tom Daschle aide -- will soon be making=20
farewells, assuming the White House doesn't renominate him. Mr. Adelstein=20
has been a persistent obstacle to competition in telecom, and to the kind=20
of lower-cost, better-service telephone future that yesterday's FCC vote=20
heralds.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: WSJ Editorial Staff]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110005280187269776,00.html?mod=3Dtoda...
s_opinion
(requires subscription)
*** This decision has generated a bit of controversy and a good deal of=20
reaction. For more coverage of the story and reaction from many, many=20
organizations, see sections at the end of this email. ***
MORE FROM FCC
ADELSTEIN'S RENOMINATION COULD MOVE WITH JUDGES
Don't pack those bags so quickly, FCC Commissioner Adelstein. Because=20
judicial nominations can take so long to move through Congress, President=20
Bush may be interested in nominating you for another term, if Senate=20
Democrats will confirm a number (80-100) judges that have been held up by=20
the body. As one House Republican staffer said, =93I'll take Jonathan=20
Adelstein for 80 judges any day of the week.=94 Many Senators -- from both=
=20
sides of the aisle -- have expressed their support for Commissioner=20
Adelstein. Congress will resume Nov. 16 for a session designed to finish=20
nearly 10 appropriations bills, an intelligence reform bill, and several=20
other lingering issues.
In a separate story, it was reported widely yesterday that Chairman Michael=
=20
Powell intends to stay on at the FCC for now. There has been speculation=20
that he would leave shortly after the election.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Terry Lane]
(Not available online)
NAB TO FIGHT 'LOCAL' SAT RADIO
The National Association of Broadcasters Tuesday vowed to continue fighting=
=20
locally targeted traffic and weather reports by satellite radio despite=20
withdrawing its petition asking the FCC to prohibit them. The FCC several=20
weeks ago was moving toward rejecting NAB's request but the NAB's pending=20
withdrawal of the petition apparently prompted the commission to hold off=20
on a ruling. For now, the satellite radio industry is gloating and contends=
=20
NAB withdrew its petition to "save face" rather than suffer a public=20
defeat. "This a complete vindication of our position that XM has complied=20
and continues to comply with FCC rules," the company said in a statement.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA479302.html?display=3DBreakin...
ws&referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
See the NAB's request to dismiss the petition at
http://www.nab.org/newsroom/pressrel/filings/SDARSMotiontoDismiss11804.pdf
CE SEEKING CHANGES IN DTV TUNER PHASE-IN ON 25"-36" SETS
The Consumer Electronics industry petitioned the FCC to move up the=20
deadline by which all TV sets with 25"-36" screen sizes must have ATSC=20
tuners. The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) and the Consumer=20
Electronics Retailers Coalition (CERC), in a joint petition, asked that the=
=20
July 2006 date by which all such receivers must have DTV tuners be moved up=
=20
to March 2006 and that the July 2005 date by which 1/2 the sets must be=20
ATSC-capable be eliminated. They cited unforeseen and =93unduly disruptive=
=94=20
consequences of the Commission=92s phase-in schedule.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Paul Gluckman]
(Not available online)
See Press Release at
http://www.ce.org/press_room/press_release_detail.asp?id=3D10599
MONITORING NATIONWIDE BROADBAND ROLLOUT
The FCC voted to collect additional information about the nationwide=20
availability of broadband and local telephone competition in order to=20
better monitor the status of these critical services. Broadband providers=20
will be required to provide more detailed information on the speed and=20
nature of their service. Broadband-over-power line will be a
separate category in order to track deployment more closely. To better=20
assess broadband availability, incumbent telephone and cable companies will=
=20
be asked to report the extent to which their DSL and cable modem service is=
=20
available where they provide phone or cable television service. The=20
Commission will require local telephone companies, known as local exchange=
=20
carriers or LECs, to report how many of their local service customers also=
=20
subscribe to the LEC=92s long distance service. The data will help the=20
Commission understand how bundling affects local telephone service=20
competition. To better track the dynamics of rural and underserved markets,=
=20
the Commission will require all facilities-based carriers to report,=20
regardless of their size.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254115A1.doc
PUBLIC SAFETY ACCESS TO THE LATEST BROADBAND TECHNOLOGY
The Commission revised technical specifications in the 4.9 GHz band to=20
allow manufacturers to adapt, for that band, technologies that are being=20
used in adjacent spectrum bands, such as the 5.4 GHz Unlicensed National=20
Information Infrastructure (U-NII) unlicensed band and the Intelligent=20
Transportation System (ITS) band. The Commission envisioned that, by=20
leveraging technology already developed for adjacent bands, public safety=20
licensees could use a single, low-cost device to access the 4.9 GHz band,=20
the U-NII band, and the ITS band, allowing them to enjoy savings that are=20
typically limited to the high-volume commercial market. The Commission's=20
action is intended to provide emergency responders with easier access to=20
the latest broadband technology in support of public safety and homeland=20
security missions, such as wireless local area networks for incident scene=
=20
management, emergency dispatch operations, and emergency vehicular=
operations.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254117A1.doc
E-RATE
ERATE FLOWS AGAIN -- '04 APPS STILL PENDING
The Universal Service Administrative Co. (USAC) has announced that it will=
=20
begin mailing funding commitments again and expects at least one wave of=20
funding commitments per month moving forward. This slow trickle of eRate=20
funds has prompted a broad coalition of education groups, known as the=20
Education and Libraries Networks Coalition (EdLiNC), to lobby members of=20
Congress to draft a bill that would exempt the eRate and Rural Health Care=
=20
programs from the Anti-Deficiency Act. With this simple waiver, the eRate=20
could go back to issuing funding commitment letters the way it always had,=
=20
regardless of how much money is in the bank. Apparently, FCC Chairman=20
Michael Powell supports such an exemption. The Wall Street Journal reported=
=20
that the FCC has not applied the law to the High Cost, Low Income program=20
because doing so could have a devastating effect on the entire Universal=20
Service program. It would mean phone companies would have to contribute 25=
=20
percent of their long-distance revenue in addition to their current=20
payments, the Journal reported. "That's the nightmare scenario," Frank=20
Gumper, chairman of USAC's board of directors, told the Journal. "By then,=
=20
these programs would be on the verge of collapsing."
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Cara Branigan]
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=3D5376
2005 APPLICATION WINDOW TO OPEN DEC 14
Though the status of eRate applications from 2003 should be resolved=20
shortly, most 2004 applicants will still be wondering how much eRate=20
funding they are to receive before it's time for them to apply again for=20
2005 funding. The Schools and Libraries Division of USAC announced on Nov.=
=20
5 that applicants will have 66 days in which to file applications the 2005=
=20
funding year. The application window, which is scheduled to open more than=
=20
a month later than previous years and is shorter than the typical 75 days,=
=20
will open Dec.14 and close Feb. 17.
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Cara Branigan]
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStory.cfm?ArticleID=3D5377
See the USAC announcement at
http://www.sl.universalservice.org/whatsnew/2004/112004.asp#110504
MEDIA
PUBCASTERS HOPE TO RETAIN 'STRONG' BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN SENATE
Public broadcasters believe they will still have strong, bi-partisan=20
support in the Senate, but are worried they could be hit because of an=20
upcoming budget crisis. Association of Public TV Stations (APTS) President=
=20
John Lawson said, "the problem is they are not going to have a whole lot of=
=20
money to spend.=94 The broadcasters are preparing grassroots efforts to=20
protect funding for public broadcasting. Next year, public broadcasting=20
will still have to fight against an administration bent against forward=20
funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, but APTS is hopeful of=
=20
passage of a CPB reauthorization bill that gained unanimous support in the=
=20
Senate Commerce Committee this year. APTS is still working with Congress on=
=20
an idea to create a trust fund for public broadcasting in return for a=20
voluntary quick end to analog broadcasting by public TV stations.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Dinesh Kumar]
(Not available online)
FROM FLORIDA TO FALLUJAH: WHAT THE NEWS COVERAGE COVERS UP
[Commentary] Media coverage lurches from event to event, and from spectacle=
=20
to spectacle as a substance deficit disorder hyperactively drives the news=
=20
agenda. No sooner are we focused on one major story, than another intrudes=
=20
to change the subject and insure that there is no time for follow-up, much=
=20
less thoughtful processing. In some cases, this is the natural disorder of=
=20
news, but in many others, there are hidden hands shifting the agenda in a=20
conscious effort not simply to influence what we think, but control what we=
=20
think about. Schecter uses the example of the current campaign in Fallujah=
=20
to highlight attempts to shape news narrative.
[SOURCE: Mediachannel.org, AUTHOR: Danny Schechter]
http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/affalert288.shtml
QUICKLY
2004 ITU WORLD TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDIZATION ASSEMBLY
International Bureau reported to the Commission on the 2004 International=20
Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Telecommunication Standardization=20
Assembly (WTSA) and the next steps for the Commission resulting from the=20
conference. The conference, among other things, adopted the work plan for=20
the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector over the next four years=20
which focuses on communications, network security, and maintaining=20
interoperability between current and next-generation networks. In=20
addition, the WTSA addressed communications issues challenging countries=20
around the world, including the transition from traditional communications=
=20
networks to new technologies.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254099A1.doc
UNTOLD STORIES: CREATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THE RIGHTS CLEARANCE CULTURE FOR=20
DOC FILMMAKERS
This study explores the implications of the rights clearance process on=20
documentary filmmaking, and makes recommendations to lower costs, reduce=20
frustration, and promote creativity. It focuses on the creative experience=
=20
of independent, professional documentary filmmakers.
[SOURCE: Center for Social Media, AUTHOR: Pat Aufderheide and Peter Jaszi]
http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/rock/finalreport.htm
PATRICK ROSS TO PROGRESS & FREEDOM
Patrick Ross has been named vice president for communications and external=
=20
affairs at The Progress & Freedom Foundation. Ross most recently managed=20
Washington Internet Daily and reported for its sister publication,=20
Communications Daily. He was also the first Washington Bureau Chief for=20
CNet|News.com.
The Progress & Freedom Foundation is a market-oriented think tank that=20
studies the digital revolution and its implications for public policy.
http://www.pff.org/news/news/2004/110904rossrelease.html
IRANIAN INTERNET JOURNALISTS FACE TRIAL NEXT WEEK
In Iran, the Internet has become a refuge for reformist journalists who=20
lost their jobs when the country's judiciary closed more than 100=20
pro-reform publications in the past four years. But at least nine=20
journalists writing on online journals known as weblogs and news-based=20
Internet sites have been detained by the judiciary since September and they=
=20
will face trial beginning next week accused of spreading propaganda against=
=20
the Islamic state. International human rights groups criticized the lack of=
=20
freedom of expression in Iran which they say has more journalists in jail=20
than any other country in the Middle East.
[SOURCE: Reuters]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=3DinternetNews&storyID=3D6...
37
NET ACCESS COULD KNOCK DOWN BARRIERS TO FREEDOM IN IRAQ
There could be no more effective way to promote democracy and free markets=
=20
in Iraq than to significantly boost the number of Iraqis using the=20
Internet. Can we send Steve Case there?
[SOURCE: USAToday, AUTHOR:]
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20041110/maney10.art.htm
ADDITIONAL COVERAGE OF VONAGE DECISION
FCC Includes Cable in Vonage Ruling
Republican FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin adopted cable=92s cause and won the=
=20
internal battle to broaden the staff=92s recommendation and include cable=20
telephony services.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA479292.html?display=3DBreaking+News
(requires subscription)
FCC Hands Cable the Phone
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA479288?display=3DBreaking+New...
ferral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
F.C.C. Takes on Oversight of Internet Phone Services
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/10/technology/10fcc.html
(requires registration)
FCC Gives Vonage Interstate Status In Win for Internet-Phone Firms
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110001796704968961,00.html?mod=3Dtoda...
s_page_one
(requires subscription)
FCC Asserts Role as Internet Phone Regulator
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Yuki Noguchi]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37972-2004Nov9.html
(requires registration)
FCC declares authority over states on VoIP
[SOURCE: San Jose Mercury News, AUTHOR:John Woolfolk]
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/10143621.htm
FCC Exempts VOIP From State Rules
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR:Jube Shiver Jr.]
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-fcc10nov10,1,6220451....
y?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)
REACTION TO VONAGE DECISION
* FCC Chairman Powell: Since 1870 home telephone service has been=20
essentially the same-two phones connected by a wire. This landmark order=20
recognizes that a revolution has occurred. Internet voice services have=20
cracked the 19th Century mold, to the great benefit of consumers. VoIP=20
services certainly enable voice communications between two or more people,=
=20
just as the traditional telephone network does, but that is where the=20
similarity ends. Internet voice is an Internet application that takes its=
=20
place alongside email and instant messaging as an incredibly versatile tool=
=20
for communicating with people all over the world. As such it has truly=20
unique characteristics. VoIP is customizable, global, inexpensive.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254112A2.doc
* FCC Commissioner Copps: While I agree that traditional jurisdictional=20
boundaries are eroding in our new Internet-centric world, we need a clear=20
and comprehensive framework for addressing this new reality. Instead the=20
Commission moves bit-by-bit through individual company petitions, in effect=
=20
checking off business plans as they walk through the door. This is not the=
=20
way we should be proceeding. We need a framework for all carriers and all=
=20
services, not a stream of incremental decisions based on the needs of=20
individual companies. We need a framework to explain the consequences for=
=20
homeland security, public safety and 911. We need a framework for consumer=
=20
protection. We need a framework to address intercarrier compensation,=20
state and federal universal service, and the impact on rural America. But=
=20
all I see coming out of this particular decision is . . . more questions.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254112A4.doc
* FCC Commissioner Adelstein: Where this Order falls short is its failure=20
to account in a meaningful way for essential policy issues, including=20
universal service, public safety, law enforcement, consumer privacy,=20
disabilities access, and intercarrier compensation, and the effect of our=20
preemption here.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254112A5.doc
* Michael D. Gallagher, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications=
=20
and Information: Today's FCC decision is a big step forward for advanced=20
communications in the United States. Voice communications over the Net have=
=20
been cleared for takeoff. The FCC has acted to keep the Internet--an=20
inherently global network--unburdened by costly state regulation. As a=20
result, a rich variety of IP services benefiting U.S. consumers and=20
businesses will be accelerated. Today's vote is going to keep the U.S. on=20
the cutting edge of innovation."
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2004/fccvonage_11092004.html
* Consumer Advocates: =93The FCC took all of the authority and none of the=
=20
responsibility,=94 said Mark Cooper, director of research for Consumer=20
Federation of America. =93This ruling gave VoIP providers everything they=20
asked for, but did not consider what consumers need. New technologies such=
=20
as VoIP could be a great benefit to consumers, but this piecemeal approach=
=20
to tackling the tough public policy questions puts consumers at risk.=94
Added Janee Briesemeister, senior policy analyst for Consumers Union: =93By=
=20
approving the Vonage petition, the FCC tied the hands of state regulators=20
who have asserted that VoIP is no different than traditional phone service=
=20
in terms of public safety, universal service and consumer protection.
=93If the FCC thinks the states don't have the authority to ensure public=20
safety, consumer protection and universal service for consumers, then it=20
should have provided a framework for doing so =97 but it did not,=94=20
Briesemeister added. "Companies are now free to market VoIP as an=20
alternative to traditional phone service, while consumers are left in limbo=
=20
over vital issues, such as whether E911 will work on their Internet phone.=
=94
http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_telecom_and_utilities/001607.html...
e
* Association for Local Telecommunications Services is "pleased with the=20
Commission=92s decision to maintain a light regulatory touch over Vonage=92s=
=20
service. At the same time, the Commission must acknowledge that such retail=
=20
VoIP services are not themselves alternatives to underlying bottleneck=20
facilities that these services ride over,=94 said ALTS General Counsel Jason=
=20
Oxman. "VoIP providers like Vonage do not own their own transmission=20
facilities and, under the 1996 Telecommunications Act, cannot directly=20
access the Bell companies=92 network facilities necessary to serve their=20
customers. VoIP providers therefore work extensively with competitive LECs=
=20
to access the necessary underlying networks,=94 said Mr. Oxman. =93The FCC=
must=20
continue to recognize that VoIP services will only be available to=20
consumers and small businesses if
the Commission maintains its requirement that incumbent LECs make access to=
=20
loops and transport available at cost-based rates.=94
http://206.161.82.210/NewsPress/110904VonagePetition.pdf
* CompTel/ASCENT CEO H. Russell Frisby Jr.: =93By declaring VoIP traffic as=
=20
interstate in nature, the FCC is taking an important step to encourage=20
competitive telecom service alternatives for consumers and to foster=20
entrepreneurship by those willing to explore new businesses and deploy=20
cutting-edge technology.
As one of the key tenets of CompTel/ASCENT=92s March 2004 VoIP Policy=20
Principles, federal oversight will allow VoIP and other IP-based network=20
applications the opportunity to gain acceptance without being hampered by=20
different =AD and at many times conflicting =AD rules on a state-by-state=
basis.
To foster further development of VoIP, CompTel/ASCENT believes that any=20
decision to regulate =AD or not to regulate =AD should be consistently=
applied=20
to the various network configurations designed to carry VoIP traffic. Most=
=20
importantly, access to underlying physical networks should not be allowed=20
to create a bottleneck that will foreclose on the ability of all providers=
=20
to deliver the services their customers choose.=94
http://www.comptelascent.org/news/recent-news/110904.html
* Consumer Electronics Association President and CEO Gary Shapiro: "It is=20
clear that advancement of VoIP services is a key element in driving=20
consumer demand and adoption of broadband. There is a unique synergy=20
between VoIP and broadband that allows each to be used as a purchase=20
incentive for the other. Today's action by the Commission is a strong step=
=20
toward regulatory clarity, which is needed to advance VoIP services that=20
will provide enormous benefits to consumers and the economy. We commend the=
=20
FCC's leadership in taking action to avoid a patchwork of state regulations=
=20
that would stifle the advancement of this new form of communication."
http://www.ce.org/press_Room/press_release_detail.asp?id=3D10598
* CTIA-The Wireless Association=99 President and CEO Steve Largent: =93We=20
applaud the FCC for recognizing the fundamental interstate and=20
international characteristics of IP-enabled services. Much like wireless,=
=20
one of the primary benefits of IP-enabled service is its ability to deliver=
=20
data to a consumer at anytime, in any place, from any location with=20
broadband access. CTIA strongly agrees that such services should be free=20
to develop under a single, unified regulatory framework, unencumbered by=20
conflicting state public utility regulations. Furthermore, the=20
competitive and innovative forces driving IP-enabled service to the=20
marketplace will =AD like wireless service - provide consumers with more=20
choices and lower prices.
The FCC=92s action today recognizes the harm that a patchwork of state=20
utility regulations can pose to the development and proliferation of=20
inherently interstate services such as VoIP and wireless. By establishing a=
=20
uniform, nationwide regulatory framework, IP-enabled services will avoid=20
the costly inefficiencies that accompany a patchwork of inconsistent and=20
varying regulatory schemes. This ruling is of great significance to the=20
consumer seeking these new and innovative services in the most=20
cost-effective manner possible.=94
http://www.ctia.org/news_media/press/body.cfm?record_id=3D1466
* Robert Sachs, President & CEO National Cable & Telecommunications=20
Association: =93By establishing a national framework for the regulation of=
=20
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services, the FCC has taken a=20
significant step towards promoting competition in enhanced voice=20
services. As facilities-based VoIP providers, cable companies offer=20
consumers sustainable, high quality voice services. We believe the=20
Commission's decision will further incent companies to invest in this=20
exciting new technology.=94
* Walter B. McCormick, Jr., President and CEO of USTA: "In today=92s rapidly=
=20
evolving communications market, the Commission=92s action is a necessary=
step=20
to ensure that innovative, borderless communications are not hindered by=20
outdated, conflicting regulatory schemes from fifty-one different local=20
jurisdictions. While this move acknowledges the tremendous changes in=20
communications, in future proceedings the Commission must ensure that=20
market-based competition thrives in an environment where all technologies=20
compete under the same rules. The Commission must also set a competitive=20
framework that encourages investment in the infrastructure and shares the=20
responsibility for maintaining the networks.=94
http://www.usta.org/news_releases.php?urh=3Dhome.news.nr2004_1109
* VON Coalition: The FCC today embraced the future of VoIP by ensuring it=20
will be free from a patchwork of multiple - and inevitably conflicting -=20
state jurisdictions. The VON Coalition praises today's decision to declare=
=20
VoIP an interstate service, but cautions that this is only one small step=20
toward unleashing the full promise and
potential of VoIP. The FCC now must act quickly to reform the badly broken=
=20
intercarrier compensation system and make sure new technologies and=20
services will not be hindered by a scheme to subsidize old networks. We=20
look forward to working with Congress, the FCC and the states, as well as=20
rural, urban, and other interests, to forge original yet pragmatic=20
solutions that enable consumers, businesses, and the economy to achieve the=
=20
full promise and potential that VoIP can deliver.=94
http://www.von.org/usr_files/JurisdictionStatementFINAL.pdf
The Voice on the Net or VON Coalition consists of VoIP companies.
* National Telecommunications Cooperative Association (NTCA) Chief=20
Executive Officer Michael E. Brunner: =93While we appreciate the FCC=92s=
desire=20
to foster consumer choice in the telecom marketplace, this announcement=20
does nothing to enhance those choices. This may lead to putting the=20
national telecom infrastructure in jeopardy. By getting a free ride on that=
=20
infrastructure without compensating the carriers that maintain these=20
networks, VoIP providers continue to gain a significant advantage. And, by=
=20
usurping states=92 ability to regulate these providers, the commission has=
=20
created an unfair competitive advantage over those telecom carriers that=20
are regulated at both the state and federal levels. We disagree with the=20
FCC=92s decision to give preference to one technology and tilting the=20
competitive advantage in VoIP=92s favor to the detriment of other=
technologies."
http://www.ntca.org/ka/ka-3.cfm?content_item_id=3D2705&folder_id=3D298
NTCA represents nearly 600 locally owned and controlled telecommunications=
=20
cooperatives and commercial companies throughout rural and small-town=
America.
--------------------------------------------------------------