August 2005

Subscriptions

The Benton Foundation can deliver a host of information to your desktop. Below you'll find more details about our services, followed by instructions for joining them.

Communications-Related Headlines

Communications-Related Headlines is a free, daily news summary service on the latest communications news. The list keeps you informed of developments in the world of media and telecommunications. You can view today's headlines on the Web to see a sample of the newsletter. Headlines is available both via e-mail and RSS.

Subscribe to Headlines with your Benton.org account.

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS Aggregator, paste http://www.benton.org/headlines/feed into your reader.

Telecommunications Legislation Tracker
As Congress debates an overhaul of US telecommunications law, the Telecommunications Legislation Tracker -- a non-partisan, fact-filled Benton resource -- is intended to give you the tools you need to stay abreast of the debate, linking you to a wide range of perspectives and voices. It includes up-to-date:

* Summaries of key bills
* A guide to what public interest and industry groups are saying
* Links to the reports that Congress will rely upon and
* The stories that cover it all

A RSS feed of the Telecommunications Legislation Tracker is also available. To view it in your RSS Aggregator, paste http://www.benton.org/headlines/feed into your reader.

Issue: Broadband

Broadband

is high-speed, high-capacity Internet service. The applications

made possible by broadband, such as telemedicine or

distance learning, open up new ways for citizens to

live, work and learn.

The

Federal Communications

Commission is required by the Telecommunications

Act to measure the extent of broadband deployment in

the country and determine if it is happening in a "reasonable

and timely" manner. The FCC also sets the regulatory

framework that affects competition in the industry as

well as the speed and scope of deployment.

The

Benton Foundation seeks to demonstrate the special public

value of broadband by showcasing applications. The Benton

Foundation also has a long-standing commitment to the

principles of universal service, or special federal

assistance in the deployment of telecommunication

Legacy projects

The Benton Foundation has often served as a laboratory for exploring the potential of new communications technologies and techniques to help solve social problems. The intent has been to incubate these projects and build them to independence, as in the case of Connect for Kids, or bring them full-circle to completion, as in the case of Benton projects Open Studio and Debate America. Many valuable lessons have been learned from these cutting-edge initiatives, lessons we share with our nonprofit colleagues. Our Strategic Communications for Nonprofits capacity building toolkit documents some of these lessons.

Media Ownership

Public Interest Obligations

Public Service Media

Digital Divide Network
The Benton Foundation's signature initiative over the last two years has been the 21st century skills initiative that highlights and promotes strategic interventions to raise the skills of underserved youth and young adults, enhancing their employability and strengthening civic engagement through new media. In February 2004, Benton launched the Center for Media & Community. It is established at the Education Development Center, with the goal of continuing to expand our work around the digital divide and promoting 21st Century literacy. Two Benton projects became part of the new center: Digital Divide Network and Digital Opportunity Channel.

As a nonprofit leader in addressing the digital divide, the Benton Foundation serves as producer and coordinator of the Digital Divide Network (DDN). Strong industry partnerships have helped foster an environment in which strategic integration of digital divide initiatives is possible with nonprofits and governments.

At the DDN, the digital divide is examined from many perspectives. The website offers a range of information, tools and resources that help practictioners stay on top of digital divide developments. It also serves as forum where practictioners can share their experiences with colleagues around the world. DDN looks at the causes and effects of the divide from four distinct angles: technology access, literacy and learning, content, and economic development. In each of these areas, particular attention is paid to the role of local individuals and organizations when it comes to bridging the divide. The articles and resources catalogued in DDN are the result of research and writing by the Benton Foundation and submissions by individuals and organizations actively involved in bridging the divide. DDN's content is dynamic and is subject to ongoing review for timeliness, relevance, and other factors.

The Digital Divide Network sponsors the Digital Opportunity Channel in conjunction with One World International. The mission of Digital Opportunity Channel is to educate a global audience on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) as a tool for promoting digital opportunity for all, leading to sustainable development and better quality of life. The channel sees itself serving as a tool for organizations and individuals working in ICT and digital divide efforts.

Visit the project at www.digitaldividenetwork.org

Connect for Kids

For years, the Benton Foundation has played a leading role as producer and strategist in national children's campaigns. We are proud that Connect for Kids, the online project for affecting public policy and practice for children and families launched by the foundation in 1996, was successfully incubated, becoming an independent nonprofit in January 2003. Connect for Kids, an award-winning multimedia project, is still helping adults make their communities better places for families and children. The site offers a place on the Internet for adults—parents, grandparents, educators, policymakers and others—who want to become more active citizens, from volunteering to voting with kids in mind.

Visit Connect for Kids at www.connectforkids.org.

OneWorld United States

OneWorld United States publishes U.S. and international perspectives on global issues gathered from OneWorld partners worldwide. We select from OneWorld's vast network of nongovernmental organizations, development-oriented news services, foundations, and research institutions the news and views considered to be of the greatest interest to a U.S. audience. The OneWorld U.S. edition seeks to provide balanced and accurate coverage, identify sources, and provide access to original documents, through links to partner websites. Through links to OneWorld.net, U.S. readers can easily access in-depth information organized into guides on topics and countries. OneWorld United States also provides outreach and support to U.S.-based nonprofit organizations that share our global values and want to participate in our network.

OneWorld US at us.oneworld.net.

Sound Partners for Community Health
Sound Partners for Community Health was a program of the Benton Foundation and funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Sound Partners increased public awareness of specific health issues and facilitate citizens' involvement in making decisions affecting health care by fostering partnerships between public broadcasters, community organizations and additional media entities. By utilizing a variety of programming and community engagement techniques, the alliances supported by Sound Partners helped equip individuals to participate in community problem-solving around local health issues. Visit the archived project at www.soundpartners.org. Read Local Voices for Healthy Communities for the story of ten years of Sound Partners and for highlights of its replicable qualities as seen through vignettes about three grantees.

Consumer Advisory Committee

Federal Communications Commission

The mission of the is to make recommendations to the Federal Communications Commission regarding consumer issues within the jurisdiction of the Commission and to facilitate the participation of consumers (including people with disabilities and underserved populations, such as Native Americans and persons living in rural areas) in proceedings before the Commission.

The CAC's official website is href="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/cac/" target="_blank">http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/cac/ -- this site is a service of the Benton Foundation, a member of the CAC.

Recent Committee Activity

Previous CAC Activity

Set-Up

  • Members of the Committee (DA-05-549A1.doc and DA-05-1323A1.doc)
  • Public Notice/Creation ( href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3892A1.doc" target="_blank">DA-04-3892A1.doc)
  • CAC By laws

Working Groups

  • The CAC does much of its work through small groups targeted on specific issues pending before the FCC. At its June 10, 2005, CAC decided to organize itself into the following Working Groups:
    • Disability Access (chaired by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Consumer Advocacy Network/Claude Stout)
    • Telecommunications Relay Services (chaired by Hamilton Relay/Dixie Ziegler)
    • Consumer Affairs & Outreach (chaired by Consumers First/Jim Conran)
    • Rural and Underserved Populations (chaired by Telecommunity Resource Center/Gene Crick)
    • Advanced Technologies (chaired by Media Access Group, WGBH/Larry Goldberg)
    • Homeland Security (chaired by EAD & associates/Elizabeth Davis)
    • Competition Policy (chaired by AARP/Debra Berlyn)
    • Media (chaired by Democracy Now!/Denis Moynihan)
  • CAC Working Groups are not restricted to only CAC members. To participate in forming CAC recommendations, joining a WG that concerns you. Contact Scott Marshall, the CAC�s Designated Federal Officer at Scott.Marshall@fcc.gov

How to Participate

  • Attend full committee meetings at FCC headquarters in Washington, DC
  • Listen/watch (Real Audio) full captioned committee meetings live on the internet
  • E-mail the Committee at cac@fcc.gov
  • Join a CAC Working Group and participate in forming its recommendations. Contact Scott Marshall, the CAC�s Designated Federal Officer at Scott.Marshall@fcc.gov
  • Or join one of the Benton Foundation's communications policy mailing lists for updates and summaries of the CAC meetings. Just send a subscribe message to headlines@benton.org

One World U.S.

OneWorld United States, based in Washington, D.C., is a joint venture of the Benton Foundation and OneWorld International and operates as one of 12 regional and country centers - autonomous, non-profit organizations who share the values and vision of OneWorld and want to make use of its name, technology and worldwide audience to build on the potential of the net in their own area and languages. OneWorld is a unique network for people and groups across the globe engaged in human rights and sustainable development.

The OneWorld U.S. site publishes U.S. and international perspectives on global issues gathered from OneWorld partners worldwide. OneWorld's selects the news and views considered to be of the greatest interest to a U.S. audience from its vast network of nongovernmental organizations, development-oriented news services, foundations and research institutions.

Visit the project at us.oneworld.net.

Public Service Media

History
The foundation's history in the arena of public service media has been twofold: 1) educating funders and nonprofits about the potential of new technologies and media to address and influence issues of civic and cultural importance and 2) stimulating innovative uses of the technologies by example. Publishing - both print and electronic - and convening have been our trademark strategies in enabling communities and nonprofits to produce diverse and locally responsive media content.

In the early 80s, we produced a primer in print and video on new technologies helping nonprofits effectively embrace the "information revolution." Ten year later, the information revolution morphed in a strategic communications imperative for nonprofits, and we commissioned a series of media guides for nonprofit leaders. In the mid-90s, we incubated several web portals -- Connect for Kids, Debate America, Destination Democracy, Open Studio: the Arts Online, Digital Divide Network, and OneWorld US -- as demonstration projects to deliver content more effectively to new audiences and engage them in solutions. The last two continue to thrive and operate independently.

A project we launched in 1996 with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has recently drawn to a close after providing the field with profound lessons in local alliances between community health groups and public broadcasters. Sound Partners for Community Health amplified local discussion and decision making around health care issues and helped shape a new relationship between community and media built on trust, respect, and risk-taking. As a result, we have undertaken a variety of activities to explore, strengthen, and expand "community media."

In 2000, we had a vision of "connecting communities" through local communications alliances and a digital, broadband, interactive, multi-media community platform.

Current Community Media Initiatives

Community Media Scan
Our vision for community media is coming to pass. Communities across the country are taking control of media, adapting new technologies to the social, economic, educational, cultural, and information needs of their residents. Benton has produced a "scan" of effective and emerging community media practices across media platforms that increase citizen participation in media production, governance, and policy. Conducted in collaboration with the Community Media and Technology Program of the University of Massachusetts, Boston, the scan includes information gleaned from a series of roundtable discussions with community media practitioners in Boston, Chicago, Minneapolis/St. Paul, and Portland, Oregon.

New Routes to Community Health
The success of Sound Partners inspired the foundation to take a deeper look at collaboration opportunities and the potential for media whose mission is to serve and transform the communities within which they operate. In 2007, Benton launched a new project, with support again from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, called New Routes to Community Health. New Routes is anchored in local partnerships and poised to increase the health of new immigrants and refugees by involving a range of local media and civic institutions in tackling this community's complex problems and giving voice to its vulnerable new residents.

Community Media Summit

To bring together the lessons learned through these projects and practitioners in the Midwest, the Benton Foundation, the Chicago Community Trust, and the Chicago Media Workshop co-sponsored the first Community Media Summit June 14 and 15, 2007. At the summit, we gathered to understand and examine the voices and content that make up community media and to imagine and explore the potentials of community media for serving basic human and community needs.

Public Interest Obligations

A key principle of federal communications law is that in exchange for free use of the public airwaves broadcasters agree to take actions to benefit the public. These principles are enshrined in the Radio Act of 1927 and the Communications Act of 1934 in the mandate that "broadcasting serve the public interest, convenience and necessity."

As America's television and radio stations convert to a digital format (DTV), it is appropriate to reexamine this longstanding and important social compact between broadcasters and the American people. There is a roadmap for ensuring the public benefits in the DTV transition.

Recent Updates

  • In December 2007, the FCC adopts new broadcast ownership rules allowing newspapers to own local broadcast outlets. In its Order, the FCC moves the debate over public interest obligations into a new proceeding on broadcast localism

  • On August 15, 2007, 28 Groups Tell FCC That Digital TV Rules Lack Public Benefit
    • FCC Commissioner Copps responds: "I welcome the comments of the 28 groups who came together to ask the Commission to get serious about defining how this transition will benefit not just broadcasters, but all the American people."

  • On June 12, 2007, the Midwest Democracy Network urged the FCC to impose stronger public interest obligations on local television broadcasters.

  • FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, in a New York Times op-ed, wrote that he fears the Commission has not done enough to stand up for the public interest.

  • Radio host Michael Savage attacked Rep Maurice Hinchey and other sponsors of the Media Ownership Reform Act (MORA) for seeking "the final solution for conservatives on talk radio" -- that is reinstating the Fairness Doctrine.

  • House Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell told the three main advertising groups -- the American Advertising Federation, the Association of National Advertisers and the American Association of Advertising Agencies -- that he's planning an effort to revive the Federal Communication Commission's Fairness Doctrine, which required broadcasters to offer competing viewpoints in a balanced manner when presenting controversial issues.

  • Can the Marketplace Deliver the Media We Need? by Charles Benton

  • Imus and "I'm Us" by Mark Lloyd, Center for American Progress

  • On April 16, Broadcasting&Cable reported that FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has circulated a notice of proposed rulemaking that would require online filing of TV stations' public files.

  • On March 27, 2007, the Campaign Legal Center, the Benton Foundation and the Center for American Progress wrote to House Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell and Subcommittee Ed Markey asking Congress to push the FCC to finish its inquiry into DTV public interest obligations. The FCC had been considering new DTV public interest rules since 1995 without any resolution of the issue.

  • On March 22, 2007, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said: "The Commission made a... determination to carry over obligations from analog to digital in the television context... We increased the obligations for children's programming in the digital world. The Commission is currently considering a proposal that would modify broadcasters' disclosure obligations to improve the availability and quality of information available to the public. I support this "enhanced disclosure" -- the requiring of broadcasters to tell us and the public exactly how much time they devote to, for example, local programming, news and current affairs, political campaigns, or even local sports. I am not comfortable, however, telling broadcasters exactly how much time they must spend on each of these areas. In addition, I believe mandatory minimums too often become ceilings on what broadcasters provide, not floors."

  • On March 14, 2007, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told the House Telecommunications Subcommittee that the Commission has already addressed a number of questions raised in a 1999 notice of inquiry on possible new DTV public-interest obligations noting an extension of analog public interest obligations to digital TV and by coming up with new DTV kids TV rules.

  • TVNewsDay reports that Gannett and Media General, multimedia companies with substantial newspaper and TV station interests, are quietly floating a proposal under which the FCC would grant waivers of the newspaper-broadcast crossownership rule if the stations involved in the crossownership situations accept increased public interest obligations. Other broadcasters say they, too, are willing to deal, not for regulatory relief, but for regulatory help: they want carriage of all their digital TV channels on local cable systems.

  • On March 13, 2007, Broadcasting&Cable reports, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin distributed to the other commissioners a proposal to give DTV multicast channels leased to minorities and small businesses by TV broadcasters the same must-carry rights as those stations get. Apparently the rule would allow a broadcaster to lease a multicast stream to a designated entry, with the "punch line" being that right to mandatory carriage. The proposal would essentially create a new class of station by proxy, with the same privileges, most notably carriage, and the same public interest responsibilities.

  • More Than 4,200 Days of FCC Inaction US television broadcasting will be all digital in less than 700 days, but the Federal Communications Commission still has not determined the public interest obligations of digital television broadcasters -- a matter it first asked for public comment on in 1995!

  • In September 2006, the FCC approved hundrerds of TV programs, produced by non-profit organizations, to be shown without closed captions. The National Association of the Deaf is asking for support to challenge the FCC orders.

Benton Resources & Publications


Citizen's Guide to the of Digital Television Broadcasters

Charting the Digital Broadcasting Future, the final report of the Presidential Advisory Committee on the of Digital Television Broadcasters, part of the Benton "PIAC" legacy project

Market
Conditions and Public Affairs Programming: Implications
for Digital Television Policy

Looking Back at PIAC: The Unfinished Business of Ensuring the Public Benefits from DTV

Keeping Up to Date

Benton's Communications-Related
Headlines
provides daily updates on developments
in the transition to digital television and other pressing
communications issues. Benton also provides an RSS feed on recent press reports concerning public interest obligations.

Related Resources

A number of organizations provide online
information, research, citizen action possibilities,
and other related links. A select list follows:

FCC
DTV website

Center
for Digital Democracy

Children
Now

Media
Access Project

Campaign Legal Center

Common
Cause

Media Ownership

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 fundamentally changed US broadcast ownership law. The 1996 Act directs the Federal Communications Commission to reexamine its broadcast ownership rules every few years and repeal or modify any regulation it determines to be no longer in the public interest. Currently, the FCC is reviewing broadcast ownership rules including: the national television multiple ownership rule, the local television multiple ownership rule, the radio-television cross-ownership rule, the dual network rule the local radio ownership rule and the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. The FCC is collecting public comment in 2006 and is expected to make rule changes in 2007.

Below find the latest major developments, a summary of the 2006 proceeding, input from the FCC's Consumer Advisory Committee, links to the latest research, additional background as well as ways to keep up to date on the debate and links to organizations involved in the discussion.

Latest Updates:

2006 Proceeding

On June 21, 2006, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) that seeks comment on how to address the issues raised by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Prometheus v. FCC, which two years ago stayed and remanded several media ownership rules that the Commission had adopted in 2003. The Further Notice also opens a comprehensive quadrennial review of all of the media ownership rules. The 1996 Telecommunications Act mandates that the FCC periodically review its broadcast ownership rules to determine "whether any of such rules are necessary in the public interest as a result of competition."

The Further Notice details the issues raised in the Prometheus case regarding the Commission’s earlier decisions and rationale. It discusses, and invites comment on, the rules that the court remanded:

  • Should the Commission revise the limits adopted in the 2003 decision on the number of broadcast stations that can be commonly owned in one market, or is there additional evidence or analysis available now upon which the Commission can rely to further justify the limits adopted then?
  • Should the Commission revise these numerical limits or is additional evidence available to further justify them?
  • How should the Commission address radio/television and newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership issues?

The Notice seeks comment on the court’s remand of certain proposals relating to minority ownership.

A summary of the FCC FNPFM is available here. Comments in the proceeding are due October 23, 2006. Reply comments are due on January 16, 2007. The FCC provides information about how to file a comment.


Consumer Advisory Committee Input

On July 21, 2006, the FCC's Consumer Advisory Committee recommended that it would be in the best interest of consumers for the Commission to adopt a process in the 2006 media ownership review that will provide a full record on the potential impact of media ownership concentration and actively engage consumers in the proceeding. CAC believes it is necessary to have a transparent process that ensures consumers understand the full implications of Commission decisions. Such an open forum is especially critical for public input on issues of this magnitude, especially where the main purveyors of information have historically provided little coverage of this issue. To these ends, the CAC recommends that the Commission:

  • begin a comprehensive proceeding to adopt rules that will promote the core values of localism, competition, and diversity, and that will expand the multiplicity of voices and choices that support our marketplace of ideas and that sustain American democracy and creativity,
  • schedule and attend a series of hearings across the country to engage the American people on the future of their media and to gain a better understanding of the impact of media concentration on our communities,
  • compile a far more complete record, including independent research studies on media concentration in a variety of markets, so that the Commission can make a decision on a more solid foundation that the 2003 effort,
  • in releasing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, provide full notice and a significant comment period on the specific proposals, as warranted, so that the public knows what new rules the Commission is considering.

On November 3, 2006, the CAC adopted a second recommendation on the 2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review of the Commission's Rules. The recommendation asks the FCC to adopt media ownership rules that promote:

  • Local ownership of broadcast outlets;
  • Competition as manifested through increased responsiveness to community needs and increased diversity of programming; and
  • Ownership opportunities for minorities, women and people with disabilities.

In addition, the recommendation reiterates the CAC's previous call to compile a complete record and issue specific rules changes for public comment -- and asks the Commission to aggressively enforce its media ownership rules. (See full text of the recommendation.)

For additional information about the CAC recommendation, click here.

Latest Research & Resources

Background

The Federal
Communications Commission
(FCC) voted in early June
2003 to relax the nation's media ownership rules, resulting
in strong reactions to the decision that is spurring
court action and new legislation.

The
FCC is an independent, federal regulatory body that
sets the limits on who can own what media properties.
Congress has mandated that the nation's media ownership
rules promote "localism, competition, and diversity
in the media." Among other things the overturned
rules limited a single corporation from dominating local
TV markets or from merging a community's TV stations,
radio stations, and newspaper. They also prevented the
merging of two of the major Television networks (FOX,
NBC, ABC, or CBS).

Proponents
of the deregulatory course the FCC has set in motion
say the existing rules cannot withstand court challenges
and are obsolete with the growth of the Internet, cable,
and satellite TV. Vocal opponents of

deregulation fear that a greater concentration of media
ownership will lead to fewer voices, excessive control
over content, and less local news -- threatening democracy
in the digital age. Members of Congress are advancing
legislation to reverse the FCC's decision.

Keeping
Up to Date

Benton's Communications-Related
Headlines
provides daily updates on developments
in the realm of media ownership and other pressing communications
issues. For just stories related to media ownership, follow this link.

Resources

A
number of websites provide online background information
and other related links. A select list follows: