February 2006

Stations Get Lion's Ad Share of My TV

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Allison Romano]

AT&T Bucks Top Upton, Dingell Contributions

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton ]

Time for PUC to protect the public

[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Richard Holober, Consumer Federation of California]

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Friday February 24, 2006

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.

Four events of note next week: two Senate=20
Commerce Committee hearings on Universal Service,=20
a discussion of spectrum management, and a=20
hearing on VoIP. For these and other upcoming=20
media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

SPECTRUM POLICY
Dueling Wireless Bills Spark Confusion, Surprise
New Legislation Would Open Unused TV Channels for Wireless Broadband
Tech leaders ask U.S. government to scrap=20
outdated policies on valuable airwaves use

INTERNET
Neutrality and Municipalities
Americans' Home Net Adoption Slowing

TELEVISION
Phone Companies=92 Redlining not Good for Digital Divide
Statewide video franchise bill advances in Missouri Legislature
Cable a la carte
Time Warner Sells Turner South to Fox
Stations Get Lion's Ad Share of My TV

POLICYMAKERS
AT&T Bucks Top Upton, Dingell Contributions
Time for PUC to protect the public

QUICKLY -- China's media censorship rattling=20
world image; Journalists Praise Coverage, Pan=20
Administration; California bill would bar toxins=20
in cell phones, iPods; UK telecoms watchdog turns=20
gaze to VoIP services; Canadian college curbs Wi-Fi due to health risks

SPECTRUM POLICY

DUELING WIRELESS BILLS SPARK CONFUSION, SURPRISE
[SOURCE: Technology Daily, AUTHOR: David Hatch]
So why did both Senate Commerce Chairman Ted=20
Stevens (R-Alaska) and Sen. George Allen (R-VA)=20
introduce bills on wireless broadband last week?=20
The bills are intended to spur the deployment of=20
wireless broadband by utilizing unassigned or=20
unused broadcast television spectrum called=20
"white space." The measures would let unlicensed=20
service providers operate on the frequencies=20
before and after the nation's transition to=20
digital television. A Commerce Committee staffer=20
notes that multiple bills with varying approaches=20
on a subject are not uncommon. The bills differ=20
on how they would tackle potential interference=20
with TV signals, a key concern of broadcasters.=20
Sens Barbara Boxer (D-CA), John Kerry (D-MA) and=20
John Sununu (R-NH) co-sponsored Sen Allen's bill.=20
Sen Stevens' measure was filed without co-sponsors.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-MPIZ1140707295830.html
* Press release for Stevens bill:=20
http://commerce.senate.gov/newsroom/printable.cfm?id=3D251754
* Press release for Allen bill:=20
http://allen.senate.gov/?c=3Drecord&t=3D&record_id=3D5531

NEW LEGISLATION WOULD OPEN UNUSED TV CHANNELS FOR WIRELESS BROADBAND
[SOURCE: New America Foundation]
Last Friday, Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted=20
Stevens (R-AK) introduced legislation directing=20
the FCC to open unused TV channels in each local=20
market=97also known as =93white spaces=94 -- for=20
unlicensed wireless broadband access. A=20
bipartisan foursome of Commerce Committee=20
members=97Senators George Allen (R-VA), John Sununu=20
(R-NH), John Kerry (D-MA) and Barbara Boxer=20
(D-CA)=97introduced similar legislation. These=20
tremendously valuable=97and presently dormant=97TV=20
band frequencies represent the much-needed rocket=20
fuel that rural and other under-served areas need=20
for affordable broadband deployment. Vacant TV=20
channels are perfectly suited for WiFi and other=20
unlicensed wireless Internet=20
technologies. Low-frequency TV band spectrum=20
propagates farther and penetrates physical=20
obstacles better than the crowded =93junk band=94=20
currently used for WiFi networking. Access to TV=20
spectrum will allow commercial ISPs,=20
municipalities and non-profit community efforts=20
to deploy wide-area wireless broadband networks=20
quickly and at a low cost. In 2004, the FCC=20
initiated a rulemaking (Docket 04-186) to open up=20
these white spaces to wireless broadband devices,=20
subject to strict rules to avoid interference=20
with TV reception. The proceeding has stalled=20
since the departure of Chairman Michael=20
Powell. The newly introduced legislation would=20
break this regulatory impasse. Here are New=20
America=92s most recent policy papers regarding the=20
importance of opening up low-frequency spectrum=20
in the TV band for unlicensed use: 1) Reclaiming=20
the Vast Wasteland: The Economic Case =AD This=20
Issue Brief, by New America's J.H. Snider,=20
describes the tremendous economic benefits of=20
unlicensed spectrum and how economic and=20
technological forces are leading the world in a=20
natural shift from high-power, licensed wireless=20
networks to wide-area networks of low-frequency,=20
low-power unlicensed devices. 2) Myth vs. Fact:=20
Rhetoric and Reality of Progress in Allocating=20
More Spectrum for Unlicensed Use =AD This Fact=20
Sheet demonstrates just how little high-quality=20
low-frequency spectrum is dedicated for=20
unlicensed use, compared to the amount devoted to=20
exclusive use by licensed wireless service=20
providers. 3) Wireless Public Safety Data=20
Networks Operating on Unlicensed Airwaves =AD This=20
updated Policy Backgrounder describes how local=20
governments=97in Texas, Kansas, California and=20
other states=97are using unlicensed wireless=20
broadband networks to improve public safety across the country.
For additional recent publications on this issue=20
-- and related issues -- see www.spectrumpolicy.org.
Also see --
* Miracle of Miracles
http://quixote.blogs.com/telecompolicy/2006/02/miracle_of_mira.html
* New America Pushes Unlicensed Bills
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6310176?display=3DBreaking+Ne...
referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

TECH LEADERS AS US GOVERNMENT TO SCRAP OUTDATED=20
POLICIES ON VALUABLE AIRWAVES USE
[SOURCE: RedHerring]
some of the most influential companies in high=20
tech on Thursday called on the U.S. Congress and=20
President Bush=92s administration to adopt a=20
revamped wireless spectrum policy that=20
accommodates the growing importance of the=20
nation=92s valuable airwaves. The Technology CEO=20
Council announced a 10-point plan it believes=20
will help the U.S. government de-politicize=20
policy-making regarding spectrum distribution.=20
The group is asking the government to factor in=20
recent technological and commercial demands on=20
the nation=92s airwaves and to try to balance those=20
needs with the needs of emergency first=20
responders. The council, a 17-year-old coalition=20
of chief executives, includes Motorola=92s Edward=20
Zander, IBM=92s Samuel Palmisano, Paul Otellini of=20
Intel, and Hewlett-Packard=92s Mark Hurd, among=20
others. It was formerly known as the Computer Systems Policy Project.
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=3D15838&hed=3DCEOs%3a+New+Wirel...
+Policy+
See press release:=20
http://www.techceocouncil.org/index.php?option=3Dcom_content&task=3Dview...
=3D249&Itemid=3D159

INTERNET

NEUTRALITY AND MUNICIPALITIES
[SOURCE: Telephony, AUTHOR: Ed Gubbins]
Inflamed by countless bloggers and sizzling=20
beneath the spotlight of congressional hearings,=20
debate over network neutrality reached a boiling=20
point this month as no less an authority than=20
Vinton Cerf -- one of the Internet's founding=20
fathers and a current employee of net neutrality=20
advocate Google -- warned the Senate's Commerce=20
Committee that incumbent carrier control of=20
broadband networks could =93fundamentally=20
undermine=94 the Internet as we know it. With this=20
dramatic stride upstage, the net neutrality=20
debate -- and its attendant fears about=20
censorship, prices and consumer choice -- could=20
fuel interest in municipally owned broadband=20
networks as an alternative to privately owned=20
pipes. However, net neutrality proponents may=20
find public networks to be fraught with plenty of=20
their own problems as well. =93[The] network=20
neutrality [debate] is not a fuel for the=20
municipal broadband movement in the U.S.,=94 said=20
Pam Baker, and analyst for visiongain. =93It's a =85=20
stumbling block. Cities and communities need=20
technology companies' expertise, experience and=20
money to build, operate and maintain [municipal=20
broadband networks], but they cannot afford to=20
give those companies total, or even majority,=20
control. To do so would be perceived as=20
governmental favoritism, which is seen as equally=20
destructive as government competition with=20
private companies. Yet cities repeatedly fail=20
when they attempt to provide [muni broadband=20
networks] themselves.=94 In addition, even=20
wholesale municipal network models don't=20
necessitate net neutrality. It's conceivable, at=20
least in theory, that municipalities could seek=20
to defray part of the cost of their broadband=20
networks by following AT&T's lead, charging=20
content providers for premium use of networks.=20
It's unknown how Congress will ultimately handle=20
the net neutrality issue as it embarks on a=20
rewrite of the 1996 Telecom Act. Whatever actions=20
legislators take are unlikely to completely=20
resolve the issue. In the meantime, muni=20
broadband may be motivated to act now before the rules change again.
http://telephonyonline.com/regulatory/news/telecom_neutrality_municipali...
s/
More commentary --
* Network neutrality? Hush!
http://www.cedmagazine.com/article/CA6303855.html
* Network Neutrality
http://news.tmcnet.com/news/2006/02/20/1389045.htm

AMERICANS' HOME NET ADOPTION SLOWING
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Daniel Terdiman]
New research from Parks Associates finds that=20
about 64 percent of Americans had some form of=20
Internet access at home in 2005 -- up from 62=20
percent in 2004. But the firm predicts that=20
Internet adoption will grow only 3 percentage=20
points by 2009. The Parks Associates report said=20
that 42 percent of Americans now have some form=20
of broadband access at home, while 22 percent=20
more have dial-up. An additional 13 percent get=20
Internet access only outside of the home -- at=20
work or a library, for example -- and 23 percent=20
don't use the Internet at all. John Barrett,=20
director of research at Parks Associates, says=20
that there are large pockets of Americans for=20
whom modern technology means fancy televisions=20
and home entertainment systems and not computers.=20
And thus, he suggested, the only way to convince=20
such people to get online would be to bundle=20
computers and Internet service with televisions.
http://news.com.com/Study+Americans+home+Net+adoption+slowing/2100-1034_...
042670.html?tag=3Dnefd.top
See the Park Associates press release at=20
http://www.parksassociates.com/press/press_releases/2006/nat-scan_pr1.html

TELEVISION

PHONE COMPANIES REDLINING NOT GOOD FOR DIGITAL DIVIDE
[SOURCE: Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, AUTHOR:=20
James Bertram, Mayor of Lockhart, Texas]
[Commentary] First-of-its-kind video franchise=20
legislation written on behalf of the big phone=20
companies made dubious history when the Texas=20
legislature enacted it this year. But before=20
Congress, Indiana and other states consider=20
mimicking this legislation, they should look=20
under the hood. For if they do, they will realize=20
that what was sold as a plan for competition is=20
really just a road map for the Bells to=20
systematically redline minority and low-income=20
communities by bypassing them in the deployment=20
of their high-speed fiber networks. The big phone=20
companies=92 attempt to balkanize their rollout of=20
high-speed facilities, and to systematically=20
exclude low-income and minority communities, runs=20
contrary to federal law, local franchise=20
agreements and sound public policy. For decades,=20
the Supreme Court has recognized that =93separate=20
is inherently unequal.=94 By pushing a policy that=20
will deepen an already cavernous digital divide,=20
the big phone companies seem bent on keeping us=20
separate -- and therefore unequal -- a bit longer.
http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/news/editorial/13931726.htm

STATEWIDE VIDEO FRANCHISE BILL ADVANCES IN MISSOURI LEGISLATURE
[SOURCE: St Louis Post Dispatch, AUTHOR: Jerri=20
Stroud jerristroud( at )post-dispatch.com]
The Missouri Senate Commerce Committee voted 7-2=20
Tuesday to send a statewide video franchising=20
bill to a working group chaired by its sponsor,=20
Sen. John Griesheimer, R-Washington. The group=20
will discuss language governing the construction=20
of video systems before the bill moves to the=20
Senate floor. Gary Markenson, executive director=20
of the Missouri Municipal League, said he'd like=20
to see requirements that cable companies carry=20
public access and emergency interrupt channels.=20
The current bill would allow franchisees to carry=20
them only if it was technologically feasible.
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/story/F0A54D1A3F84...
B8625711D001545B5?OpenDocument

CABLE A LA CARTE
[SOURCE: The Kansas City Star, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] With choices multiplying, cable=20
companies will be pressured to do more to keep=20
subscribers happy, and are likely to respond by=20
offering more options, including a la carte=20
pricing. Currently, Congress requires cable=20
companies to offer basic service packages that=20
include local TV stations. There's no need for=20
legislation that goes much beyond that. With the=20
media landscape changing so rapidly, lawmakers=20
should resist the temptation to pass laws that could soon be outdated.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/3678757.html

TIME WARNER SELLS TURNER SOUTH TO FOX
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Anne Becker]
After months of deep discussions, Time Warner has=20
sold Atlanta-based regional cable channel Turner=20
South to Fox. Seven-year-old Turner South, a=20
division of Turner Broadcasting System, reaches=20
about 8 million subscribers across six states=20
with mainly sports programming including Atlanta=20
Braves, Hawks and Thrashers games. In acquiring=20
the network, Fox also inherits the long-term=20
broadcast deals Turner South had with Atlanta=92s=20
baseball, basketball and hockey teams. The=20
financial terms of the deal were not disclosed,=20
but industry analysts have estimated Turner South=20
to be worth about $200 million. With the addition=20
of Turner South, Fox Cable Networks (FCN) now=20
owns 15 regional cable networks and partners with=20
44 MLB, NBA and NHL franchises. FCN already owns=20
Atlanta-based FSN South, the country=92s largest=20
regional sports network with more than 11 million subscribers.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6310352?display=3DBreaking+Ne...
referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
See also --
* Fox Cable Nets Purchases Turner South For $200 Million
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=3D100...
4216
* News Corp. Buys Turner South For $375 Million
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114074230282382000.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace

STATIONS GET LION'S SHARE OF MY TV
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Allison Romano]
Fox=92s planned network My Network TV will give its=20
affiliates a majority of advertising inventory in=20
its prime time block, one way the network is=20
enticing stations to sign on. When the network=20
launches in September, affiliates will receive=20
65% of ad inventory, or nine minutes an hour,=20
while the network keeps the remaining five=20
minutes. That is more ad time than local stations=20
typically receive in prime time or in barter=20
syndication deals, which are usually an even=20
split with syndicators. The CW, for example, is=20
offering stations three minutes of commercials in=20
prime and four minutes during daytime.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6310365?display=3DBreaking+Ne...
referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

POLICYMAKERS

AT&T BUCKS TOP UPTON, DINGELL CONTRIBUTIONS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton ]
With network neutrality, telco video, and a=20
rewrite of the Communications Act on Washington's=20
agenda, it should probably come as no surprise=20
that AT&T shows up as the top contributor to the=20
2006 campaigns of a couple of top house=20
Telecommunications Subcommittee members, with=20
other communications companies well-represented.=20
According to the Center for Public Integrity,=20
AT&T's PAC contributions combined with those of=20
individual executives or employees and family=20
members, top the list of contributors to House=20
Telecommunications Subcommittee Chairman Fred=20
Upton (R-MI) at $12,000. But telcos are not the=20
only interested parties. Comcast is at #3 with=20
$10,000, tied with the National Cable &=20
Telecommunications Association, followed by the=20
National Association of Broadcasters at $9,250.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6310328?display=3DBreaking+Ne...
referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

TIME FOR PUC TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Richard=20
Holober, Consumer Federation of California]
[Commentary] As cell phones become more popular,=20
consumer complaints have soared. One means of=20
mitigating those grievances: the California=20
Public Utilities Commission, which is supposed to=20
protect the consumer. So far, however, the=20
commission has fiddled while phone users burn=20
with anger and frustration. Next month, the=20
spotlight will be on the PUC as it considers=20
enacting modest rules to curb the worst=20
cell-phone industry practices. The Consumer=20
Federation recommends a proposal from PUC=20
Commissioner Dian Grueneich which grants=20
consumers some real relief from the worst phone=20
company abuses. The alternative restores the=20
right to revoke new phone service for 30 days=20
without penalty or early termination fees. It=20
stops phone companies from changing the terms of=20
a contract without the customer's consent. And it=20
adds an important new protection for non-English=20
speaking customers. It would require phone=20
contracts to be written in the same language the=20
company uses to market the product -- saving=20
vulnerable consumers from bait-and-switch tactics.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/chronicle/archive/2006...
/23/EDG2PHCEC91.DTL

QUICKLY

CHINA'S MEDIA IMAGE RATTLING WORLD IMAGE
[SOURCE: The Christian Science Monitor, AUTHOR: Robert Marquand ]
The war on liberal ideas is starting to alter the=20
image of China overseas. For a decade, the=20
country has been seen as a rambunctious marvel of=20
manufacturing and export, of developing=20
infrastructure, and a major source of cash=20
reserves. It has managed to outflank human rights=20
agendas, and enjoys an image as a safe,=20
traditional society that is emerging into the=20
international mainstream. Beijing won its 2008=20
Olympics bid in the midst of a brutal roundup of=20
Falun Gong practitioners in 2001 -- many of whom=20
remain disappeared. "China's deteriorating=20
international image is impacting its ability to=20
achieve its foreign policy goals, and could well=20
affect its ability to stage a successful Olympics=20
in 2008," argues John Kamm, former head of the=20
American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong, who=20
now runs Dui Hua, a nonprofit human-rights group=20
in San Francisco. Mr. Kamm says the State=20
Department report on human rights in China due=20
next month will be far tougher than in recent years.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0224/p01s04-woap.html
* Breaching China's great firewall
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0224/p08s01-comv.html

JOURNALISTS PRAISE COVERAGE, PAN ADMINISTRATION
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Journalists primarily divided their energy at the=20
National Press Foundation awards dinner Thursday=20
night in Washington between praising their=20
colleagues for their efforts to report on=20
Hurricane Katrina and slamming the Bush Administration.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6310368?display=3DBreaking+Ne...
referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

CALIFORNIA BILL WOULD BAR TOXINS IN CELL PHONES, iPODS
[SOURCE: Reuters]
California would require manufacturers to phase=20
out the use of hazardous materials in making cell=20
phones, iPods and other electronic devices under=20
a bill introduced by a state lawmaker. The bill=20
unveiled on Thursday by Assembly Member Lori=20
Saldana, a Democrat from San Diego, would apply=20
to any electronic or battery-operated device. The=20
bill, which was introduced on Wednesday, would=20
require manufacturers to stop using the=20
substances in devices sold in California by 2008.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DtechnologyNews&sto...
D=3D2006-02-24T003419Z_01_N23179980_RTRUKOC_0_US-TOXICS-CALIFORNIA.xml&arch=
ived=3DFalse

UK TELECOMS WATCHDOG TURNS GAZE TO VOIP SERVICES
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Mark Odell]
On Wednesday, England's Ofcom, the telecoms and=20
media regulator, published a consultation=20
document in which it outlined basic consumer=20
protection measures and moves to investigate=20
complaints and potentially take punitive action=20
concerning Internet telephone services (VoIP).=20
Interested parties have until May to respond to=20
the document with Ofcom expected to publish its=20
decision in August. Ofcom, which published=20
initial guidelines for VoIP service providers in=20
September 2004, said it had decided some=20
regulation was necessary because of recent=20
technological changes and increasing consumer=20
appetite. Despite the promise of low-cost and=20
sometimes free calls, VoIP is dogged with=20
problems of reliability and quality. Ofcom is=20
proposing that service providers make clear to=20
consumers what their services offer. Most service=20
providers do not give users access to the=20
emergency services on 999, nor will they allow=20
their customers to use their existing phone numbers.
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/f2949024-a46b-11da-897c-0000779e2340.html
(requires subscription)

CANADIAN COLLEGE CURBS WI-FI DUE TO HEALTH RISKS
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: David Rider]
Lakehead University, in Thunder Bay, Ontario, has=20
ruled out campus-wide wireless Internet access=20
because its president fears the system's=20
electromagnetic forces could pose a risk to=20
students' health. But the president's stance has=20
prompted a backlash from students and from=20
Canadian health authorities, who say his fears are overdone.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DtechnologyNews&sto...
D=3D2006-02-23T191816Z_01_N23531951_RTRUKOC_0_US-LIFE-CANADA-INTERNET.xml&a=
rchived=3DFalse
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we're outta here. Have a great weekend.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.pulvermedia.com/f2c/

The future of telecommunications starts now; there's a new U.S. Telecom Bill in the works, there's unbundling in Europe, fast fiber in Asia, wireless across Africa and networks a-building in cities and villages around the world. Join the discussion. Shape the debate. Assert your F2C:Freedom to Connect.



Today's Quote

My Network TV -- A Stinker is Born

Many, including us, saw the merger of UPN and the WB as an opportunity for the "orphaned" stations that would not get the new CW to put on local and independent programming, and thus compete against the same ol', same ol', from the same ol' TV networks. Boy, was that ever wrong. Spectacularly wrong!

FCC Plans Fines in Broadcast Indecency Cases

[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Steven Levingston and Arshad Mohammed]

Selling Junk Food to Toddlers

[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]

News Corp. Unveils My Network TV

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John M. Higgins & John Eggerton]

War in the Information Age

[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld]