Whitacre Sees No Video Price War
WHITACRE SEES NO VIDEO PRICE WAR
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
WHITACRE SEES NO VIDEO PRICE WAR
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
HIGH-TECH FIRMS WANT TO MAINTAIN NETWORK NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle 6/2, AUTHOR: Tom Abate]
BROADBAND REGULATION: WILL CONGRESS NEUTER THE NET?
[SOURCE: Heritage Foundation, AUTHOR: James L. Gattuso]
HOUSE TO VOTE ON BROWNBACK BILL
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
INTERNET ON US PLANES MOVES CLOSER TO TAKEOFF
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Jeremy Pelofsky]
FCC CLARIFIES "DESIGNATED ENTITY" ELIGIBILITY RULES
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
AT&T/BELLSOUTH OPPONENTS WEIGH IN
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Public comment is due today at the Federal Communications Commission on the proposed merger of AT&T and BellSouth. Opponents include American Antitrust Institute, COMPTEL, Consumer Federation of America; Free Press, Media Access Project, National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates. The groups also promise on June 6 to announce "new activities and strategies" to block the deal.
This year, for the first time, consumers will buy more high-definition, digital television (HDTV) sets than traditional ones. Morgan Stanley estimates that nearly 26% of households will enjoy HD's gee-whiz video and theater sound by year's end and that 67.6% will in 2010, thanks to prices falling from today's $1,000 and up. That's good news for the TV industry, right? Maybe not for cable operators. Their wires are so packed with TV channels and new services -- including video on demand (VOD), broadband Internet and phone -- that many are scrambling to find bandwidth for the coming wave of HD channels. “Cable operators need massive capacity for HDTV, and have to move quickly,†says Sanford C. Bernstein's Craig Moffett. “HDTV is hot.†Executives say they're on the case. But their favorite plans to fix their bandwidth problem will, at least in the short-term, create hassles for millions of subscribers -- especially those who hate the idea of hooking their TVs to a set-top box. For example, one solution could strip dozens of channels from customers with cable-ready TVs -- forcing them to pay an extra $10 or more a month for a digital box and service just to keep the channels they get now without them. The other leading remedy would hobble new HDTV sets designed with a slot to work with a slick, credit card-size CableCard instead of a box. In addition to being an inconvenience and expense, either change would represent yet another setback for the decade-old federal effort to force the industry to free consumers from cable boxes. But operators seem willing to take the heat. They fear that if they fail to heed warnings such as Moffett's, they'll lose many of their 65 million subscribers who are hot for HD to satellite and phone company rivals that already are able to offer lots of HDTV channels and plan many more.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20060605/hdcable.art.htm
INTERNET SURVEILLANCE PROVIDERS
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
WAVE OF MEDIA CONSOLIDATION IN RESPONSE TO INTERNET
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
© 1994-2024 Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. All Rights Reserved.