April 2007

Local TV stations face Net threat

LOCAL TV STATIONS FACE NET THREAT
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Greg Sandoval]

House Pitched On Public-Private Spectrum Plan

HOUSE PITCHED ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE SPECTRUM PLAN
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The House Commerce Committee was pitched Thursday on a new private industry-government partnership to use some of the auctioned analog TV spectrum for a public safety communications systems. The systems would be available for private use during non-emergencies. Backers of the Frontline Wireless proposal, which include former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt, made their case at a House Telecommunications Subcommittee hearing on the future of wireless telecommunications.

Hollywood on the Campaign Trail

HOLLYWOOD ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL
[SOURCE: The Hollywood Reporter, AUTHOR: Brooks Boliek]

Richardson Leads Race To TV Ads

RICHARDSON LEADS RACE TO TV ADS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Chris Cillizza]

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Friday April 20, 2007

BROADCASTING
Talk Radio Tries for Humor and a Political Advantage
Can the Marketplace Deliver the Media We Need?
Imus and =93I'm Us=94
NCTA Opposed to Dual Carriage
Local TV stations face Net threat

NEWS FROM CONGRESS
House Pitched On Public-Private Spectrum Plan
House panel approves anti-spyware bill

MEDIA & ELECTIONS
Hollywood on the Campaign Trail
Richardson Leads Race To TV Ads

TELECOM
Berlusconi Telecom Italia Move Will Further Politicize Battle

BROADCASTING

TALK RADIO TRIES HUMOR AND A POLITICAL ADVANTAGE
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Jacques Steinberg]
Only a week after Don Imus was fired by MSNBC and=20
CBS Radio for making a racially and sexually=20
charged aside about the women=92s basketball team=20
at Rutgers University, his former colleagues=20
across the spectrum of talk radio have wrestled=20
with how far they can go in sounding off (and=20
even mining for a few laughs) on the violence at=20
Virginia Tech. Some of the most prominent hosts =97=20
including Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and Neal=20
Boortz =97 have shown little restraint. This, after=20
all, is an incident in which many of the themes=20
that often serve as grist for those hosts and=20
their callers =97 including immigration (Mr. Cho=20
was Korean), gun control (he appears to have used=20
handguns that were legally bought ) and the=20
aggressive coverage of the national media (NBC=20
initially broadcast the suspect=92s multimedia=20
manifesto) =97 have coalesced. And then, in an=20
effort to link the events of the last two weeks,=20
Rush Limbaugh said, =93The only thing that Virginia=20
Tech and the Imus situation have in common is NBC.=94
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/us/20radio.html
(requires registration)
-- See also --
* Networks Limit Use Of Gunman's Video
Faced with an outpouring of anger over the airing=20
of the Virginia Tech gunman's hate-filled video,=20
network executives said yesterday that they are=20
sharply restricting their use of the chilling images.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/19/AR200704...
2394.html
* NBC bashed for airing Virginia Tech killer's rants
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-et-tapes20apr20,1,4187...
story?coll=3Dla-headlines-frontpage
* TV leaves us to face the terror
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-notebook20apr20,...
686764.story?coll=3Dla-news-a_section
(requires registration)

CAN THE MARKETPLACE DELIVER THE MEDIA WE WANT?
[SOURCE: Benton Foundation, AUTHOR: Charles Benton]
[Commentary] Some are hailing the outcome of the=20
Don Imus fiasco as a triumph of media companies'=20
self-regulation. But within days of CBS firing=20
Imus, we saw the limits of relying on the=20
marketplace to ensure the public interest. Today,=20
marketers are truly the reigning power in the=20
media world, but that how it should be. There=92s=20
been a slow erosion of broadcaster public=20
interest obligations that has left Americans to=20
ask whether broadcasters are really serving their=20
local communities, whether they are meeting the=20
diverse needs of all Americans who own the=20
airwaves, and whether they are contributing to a=20
vibrant and well informed democracy. If the FCC=20
had real public interest standards that=20
broadcasters must meet to win renewal of their=20
licenses to use our airwaves, broadcasters would=20
have focused on the national tragedy in Virginia=20
instead of offering its typical escapist fare. If=20
the stations airing the Imus show were owned by a=20
minority, had a more diverse set of workers,=20
still followed the ascertainment rules that=20
required them to meet with the community it=20
served, Don Imus would have been a better person,=20
his show would have been more responsive, and the=20
whole episode might have been avoided.=20
Broadcasters can offer more than escape =AD and,=20
according to the law, they should. Consumers=20
deserve to know how broadcasters will serve their=20
day-to-day television needs =AD healthy programming=20
for children, healthy programming for our=20
democracy, healthy programming for our=20
communities, and as much information about the TV=20
programs that come into our living rooms as=20
what=92s in the food that comes into our kitchens.
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dnode/5538
* For more on Public Interest Obligations see:
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dissues/obligations
-- See also --
* As with Imus, marketplace a fair arbiter of bad speech
[Commentary] Media and entertainment figures who=20
think they have to shock to be successful would=20
do well to consider self-policing in light of the=20
Imus, Mel Gibson, Ann Coulter and Michael=20
Richards slurs, and other recent incidents. It=20
could be that the marketplace is beginning to=20
define just what it is willing to accept. This is not a constitutional matt=
er.
http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=3D/20070419/OPINION0...
04190375/1007

IMUS AND "I'M US"
[SOURCE: Center for American Progress, AUTHOR: Mark Lloyd]
[Commentary] Does his name say it all? Does Imus=20
really reflect the views of us...or just middle=20
age white men? Does the locker room banter of=20
=93I'm us=94 in the Morning reflect the way women and=20
minorities, and especially minority women, are=20
viewed by awakening white men? Is this, as some=20
of us fear, what is said and thought when the=20
rest of us are out of reach, where important=20
decisions are sometimes made in the U.S.? It is=20
important to point out that =93I'm us=94 in the=20
Morning was not on just any old soapbox. When CBS=20
and NBC fired him, =93I'm us=94 was carried by 61=20
radio stations and a cable service seen in every=20
major market in the U.S. With roughly 1.6 million=20
radio listeners per week and an average of=20
361,000 viewers, his was no small voice squeaking=20
away someplace on the Internet. =93I'm us=94 will=20
likely find another soapbox, not because he is=20
burning to do another interview, but because he=20
made his patrons some $50 million dollars a year.=20
Because there are so many people who include=20
themselves in the =93us=94 bit of =93I'm us.=94 Because=20
banter from the locker room sells. Because making=20
money is what counts most in our regulation of=20
media in America. Because profit has become the=20
substitute for the public interest.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/04/imus.html

NCTA OPPOSED TO DUAL CARRIAGE
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The cable industry took issue yet again with FCC=20
Chairman Kevin Martin's proposal to require cable=20
systems to deliver both analog and digital=20
versions of TV station signals after the=20
transition to digital. The National Cable &=20
Telecommunications Association says that it has=20
always planned to deliver broadcast signals "to=20
all customers" after the transition. But its=20
point was that there was no call for a government=20
mandate. Cable operators are under no explicit=20
obligation to carry both analog and digital=20
signals after the conversion to digital, but=20
Martin apparently sees at least an implicit one=20
in a law requiring cable operators to deliver a=20
"viewable" signal to subscribers.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6435130.html
* Comcast Urges No Must-Carry Expansion
Comcast is urging the FCC to resist the adoption=20
of rules that would expand the boundaries of a=20
law that allows TV stations to demand systemwide=20
distribution from local cable systems.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6435145.html

LOCAL TV STATIONS FACE NET THREAT
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Greg Sandoval]
Some attendees of the National Association of=20
Broadcasters conference this week are worried=20
that local television affiliates will be the next=20
business species to be endangered by the=20
Internet. The warning signs are ominous for local=20
TV outlets. Last month, NBC Universal and News=20
Corp., parent company of Fox Broadcasting, helped=20
establish a new online video network that will=20
distribute full-length movies and TV shows across=20
some of the top Internet portals. CBS announced=20
its own video network last week. Is there a place=20
in this direct-to-consumers business model for=20
local TV stations? Certainly, the outlook for=20
regional broadcasters appeared troubled long=20
before the Web. Over-the-air broadcasters have=20
been challenged by cable and satellite=20
distributors for decades and for the past five=20
years by DVD sales. The Internet is just the=20
latest technological threat to come along and=20
carve another slice from the $75 billion market for TV advertising.
http://news.com.com/Local+TV+stations+face+Net+threat/2100-1025_3-617656...
tml

NEWS FROM CONGRESS

HOUSE PITCHED ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE SPECTRUM PLAN
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The House Commerce Committee was pitched Thursday=20
on a new private industry-government partnership=20
to use some of the auctioned analog TV spectrum=20
for a public safety communications systems. The=20
systems would be available for private use=20
during non-emergencies. Backers of the Frontline=20
Wireless proposal, which include former FCC=20
Chairman Reed Hundt, made their case at a House=20
Telecommunications Subcommittee hearing on the=20
future of wireless telecommunications.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6435106.html
* Chairman Dingell's statement
http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_110/110st36.shtml

HOUSE PANEL APPROVES ANTI-SPYWARE BILL
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Legislation that would help protect consumers=20
from harmful spyware that can harvest personal=20
data from a user's computer was approved on=20
Thursday by the House Subcommittee on Commerce,=20
Trade and Consumer Protection. The bill would=20
require software distributors and advertisers to=20
clearly notify and obtain consent from consumers=20
before their programs can be loaded onto a=20
computer. Violators could be fined up to $3=20
million for each unfair or deceptive act.=20
"Protecting Internet users from dangerous=20
programs that steal consumers' identities, invade=20
their software or just plain harass them is a top=20
priority," said House Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-MI).
http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN1933708420070419
* Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer=20
Protection Completes Markup on =93Spy Act=94, H.R. 964
http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_110/110nr27.shtml

MEDIA & ELECTIONS

HOLLYWOOD ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL
[SOURCE: The Hollywood Reporter, AUTHOR: Brooks Boliek]
If campaign donations are any indication, Viacom=20
is fond of Barack Obama, Comcast likes Hillary=20
Clinton and Time Warner is sweet on both.=20
Hollywood continues to be a major financier of=20
the nation's presidential campaigns, handing out=20
$2.4 million to White House hopefuls during this=20
election cycle (Jan. 1-March 30), according to an=20
analysis of campaign contributions by the Center=20
for Responsive Politics. While Sen. Obama (D-IL)=20
has made headlines with high-profile fundraisers=20
in California, he trails Sen. Clinton (D-NY) by a=20
substantial margin in the Hollywood money race.=20
Sen Clinton raised $806,558 from the television,=20
movie and music industries, compared with Sen=20
Obama's $661,385, according to CRP's examination=20
of the Federal Election Commission records of the=20
2008 cycle. The CRP calculates the data from=20
political action committee contributions and=20
contributions from individuals giving more than $200.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/business/news/e3i24b...
16578451e574c7f02ce9449906
* Financiers, Along with Lawyers, are=20
Underwriting the Race for the White House, Watchdog Finds
http://www.opensecrets.org/pressreleases/2007/PresidentialMoney.4.18.asp
-- See also --
* Presidential campaigns seek to turn=20
virtual-world interest into real-life votes
Democrat or Republican, the White House campaigns=20
are using new online tools this year in an effort=20
to attract supporters who they hope will give not=20
only their votes, but their time and money to the=20
effort. The technology is new, but not the=20
political chase - candidates want to be where the=20
voters are. And Americans today are spending their time online.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/latestheadlines/ci_5705638

RICHARDSON LEADS RACE TO TV ADS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Chris Cillizza]
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson will take to the=20
airwaves in Iowa and New Hampshire next week,=20
making him the first Democratic candidate to run=20
television ads in the states that will lead off=20
the presidential caucus and primary calendar. The=20
30- and 60-second spots were produced by Murphy=20
Putnam Media and are meant to introduce=20
Richardson to voters in two of the most critical=20
states in the nomination fight. The shorter ad=20
details Richardson's rationale for running and=20
outlines his plans for moving forward in Iraq;=20
the 60-second spot highlights his record as governor.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/19/AR200704...
2813.html
(requires registration)

TELECOM

BERLUSCONI TELECOM ITALIA MOVE WILL FURTHER POLITICIZE BATTLE
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Gabriel Kahn gabriel.kahn( at )wsj.com]
Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi=20
offered to use his vast media empire to help=20
ensure Telecom Italia SpA doesn't fall into=20
foreign hands, but his involvement will only=20
further politicize the heated battle for control=20
of the company. Mr. Berlusconi's offer is the=20
latest theatrical twist in what has become a=20
long-running soap opera that pits Telecom=20
Italia's major shareholder, Marco Tronchetti=20
Provera, against Italy's center-left government.=20
Prime Minister Romano Prodi has been trying to=20
prevent Mr. Tronchetti Provera from selling part=20
of his controlling stake in Telecom Italia to=20
foreign players. Instead, Mr. Prodi's government=20
has rallied a group of Italian banks to try to=20
ensure that the country's former phone monopoly remains under Italian contr=
ol.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117703010706976294.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we're outta here. Have a great weekend.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Berlusconi Telecom Italia Move Will Further Politicize Battle

BERLUSCONI TELECOM ITALIA MOVE WILL FURTHER POLITICIZE BATTLE
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Gabriel Kahn gabriel.kahn@wsj.com]

Can the Marketplace Deliver the Media We Need?

Some are hailing the outcome of the Don Imus fiasco as a triumph of media companies' self-regulation. But within days of CBS firing Imus, we saw the limits of relying on the marketplace to ensure the public interest.

In the hours immediately after the tragedy at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, news of the shootings spread quickly around the country and the world. But as people returned home at the end of the day could they find a place to watch that news on broadcast TV? In the Washington, DC area, surprisingly, the answer was 'no.'

On April 17, the Washington Post reported that on the night after the deadliest shooting spree in American history, the nation's most popular TV networks weren't covering the grim news during their prime-time hours. Instead, it was escapism as usual: ABC had "Dancing With the Stars" and "The Bachelor," Fox carried "24," CBS stuck with "Two and a Half Men," and NBC showed "Deal or No Deal."

The decisions of these networks and the owners of local TV stations raises serious questions for both policymakers and the public because, simply put, the airwaves used by these stations are an invaluable public resource. They make possible an incredibly lucrative commercial enterprise " broadcasting. We must not lose sight of the fact that the federal government, acting on behalf of us all, grants broadcasters access to a portion of our airwaves in exchange for a commitment to serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity. This has been the law since the 1930s.

So how well are broadcasters delivering on their commitments?

The Washington Post asked just how big does a story have to be these days to get the broadcast networks to pay attention during their most watched hours? More than a decade ago, faced with declining audiences and the choices of airing more profitable sitcoms and dramas, the networks began to cut back on coverage of the political conventions, presidential addresses and election-night results. More often than not, entertainment, not news, rules.

Trade magazine Ad Age concludes that if the whole Imus debacle tells us anything, it is that today the marketers are truly the reigning power in the media world. This seems entirely contrary to what US broadcasting law and regulation has stood for for the past 70 years. If there's anything that our daily headlines teaches us, it is that our communications resources, especially the public's airwaves, are too valuable to devote just to selling soap.

There's been a slow erosion of broadcaster public interest obligations that has left Americans to ask whether broadcasters are really serving their local communities, whether they are meeting the diverse needs of all Americans who own the airwaves, and whether they are contributing to a vibrant and well informed democracy. Before the Federal Communications Commission now are proposals for better defining the public interest obligations of digital radio and television broadcasters. Congress has mandated the transition from analog to digital television by February 17, 2009. The FCC recently adopted rules to speed the transition to digital radio, too. Now may well be the last chance we get to define the public interest standards by which the public can judge the performance of broadcasters.

If the FCC had real public interest standards that broadcasters must meet to win renewal of their licenses to use our airwaves, broadcasters would have focused on the national tragedy in Virginia instead of offering its typical escapist fare. If the stations airing the Imus show were owned by a minority, had a more diverse set of workers, still followed the ascertainment rules that required them to meet with the community it served, Don Imus would have been a better person, his show would have been more responsive, and the whole episode might have been avoided.

Broadcasters can offer more than escape and, according to the law, they should. Consumers deserve to know how broadcasters will serve their day-to-day television needs healthy programming for children, healthy programming for our democracy, healthy programming for our communities, and as much information about the TV programs that come into our living rooms as what's in the food that comes into our kitchens.

To achieve these goals, parents, voters, community leaders, activists, and concerned citizens need to pick up the television policy remote control. Change the tune coming from policymakers in Washington. Demand reality-based public interest obligations that can help make a difference in your life.

Charles Benton
Chairman and CEO
Benton Foundation

Mr. Benton has served on both the Presidential Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligations of Digital Television Broadcasters and the FCC's Consumer Advisory Committee..

Telecom Policy Agenda

Today kicks off a heavy telecom agenda over the next week or so: 1) the House Telecom Subcommittee hears about Spectrum Opportunities and the Future of Wireless, 2) on Friday, the FCC hosts a First Responders Summit, 3) on Monday, the Alliance for Public Technology will introduce ConnectKentucky to Congress and 4) on Tuesday, both the House and Senate Commerce Committees are holding hearings on broadband. And we can't forget...

FCC OPEN MEETING 4/25
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]

FCC Tees Up Dual-Carriage Plan

FCC TEES UP DUAL-CARRIAGE PLAN
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]