April 2008

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Tuesday April 22, 2008

The Senate Commerce Committee discusses the=20
Future of the Internet today, and FCC Chairman=20
Kevin Martin is a last minute invitee=20
(http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=3DPressReleases.Det=
ail&PressRelease_id=3D59628780-7507-4260-b6c6-24c2b028613e&Month=3D4&Year=
=3D2008)=20
See more on the hearing below. For this and other=20
upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar/2008/4

INTERNET/BROADBAND
Senate Commerce Committee tackles Net Neutrality today
TIA Supports FCC Proposals for Upgrades to Universal Service Fund

ELECTIONS & MEDIA
April 14-20: Obama and Clinton Debate the Debate
As PA primary heats up, more in the media invest in race
With Keystone State Now a Key State, Spend Soars
Voters: Tuned In, Turned Off
CBS's Dem Debate Officially Canceled

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
News Corp. Nears Deal to Buy Newsday
XM, Sirius Still Have Much to Prove

BROADCASTING
'Free' DTV converter boxes can't be returned?

WIRELESS/SPECTRUM
D Block: Looking back and moving forward
CTIA Comments on the FCC=92s Proposed USF Reforms

QUICKLY -- E-rate contract draws fire; Bush=20
seeks game show help on federal budget

INTERNET/BROADBAND

SENATE COMMITTEE TACKLES NET NEUTRALITY TODAY
[SOURCE: InfoWorld, AUTHOR: Mary A.C. Fallon]
Network neutrality will be at the heart of a full=20
Senate Commerce Committee hearing this morning.=20
With the expansive title "The Future of the=20
Internet," lawmakers will debate "developing=20
applications, consumer expectations, and network=20
operation" in light of new evidence by a Silicon=20
Valley startup company that Internet service=20
providers are widely throttling legal=20
peer-to-peer (p-to-p) file sharing. The=20
unexpected Senate committee hearing may signal=20
that lawmakers are ready to debate Internet bills=20
long languishing in Congress. The Senate hearing=20
comes on the heels of last Thursday's Internet=20
neutrality hearing before the Federal=20
Communications Commission at Stanford University.=20
While there was scant "hard evidence" of Internet=20
service providers mismanaging networks introduced=20
at last week's FCC hearing, Vuze, a peer-to-peer=20
video distributor based in Palo Alto, Calif., on=20
Monday released the first findings of its own=20
analysis of how major ISPs are throttling=20
Internet traffic of 8,000 users participating in=20
Vuze's study during one million hours of Internet=20
time. ISPs use the nonstandard and potentially=20
harmful practice of sending false reset packets=20
to artificially interrupt and abort network=20
connections when people are sending legal digital=20
files. Vuze created a software plug-in that could=20
be installed in the Vuze Platform application to=20
monitor all potential network interruptions that=20
a user experiences due to reset messages, not=20
interruptions specifically related to use of the=20
Vuze platform. The data released Monday covers Jan. 1 through April 13.
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/redirect?source=3Drss&url=3Dhttp://www....
oworld.com/article/08/04/22/Senate-committee-tackles-Net-neutrality_1.html
* Casting a Wide Net (Washington Post)
Sure, you might expect Stanford law professor=20
Lawrence lessig to appear at a Congressional=20
hearing on the future of the Internet, but=20
Justine Bateman? Mallory? The actress, who also=20
is a writer and producer, is slated to be among=20
the witnesses, and to share her concerns about=20
the way creative content is developed and how it=20
will be distributed in years to come. Bateman is=20
a Screen Actors Guild board member and has=20
recurring roles on "Men in Trees" and "Desperate=20
Housewives." Joining her on the panel will be=20
Patric Verrone, president of the Writers Guild of=20
America West, who -- before, during and after the=20
recent Hollywood writers' strike -- has given=20
deep thought to how creative material is=20
distributed online. (A goal of the successful=20
strike was to make sure writers received=20
residuals for programming that appeared on the=20
Internet.) The hearing will focus on developing=20
applications, consumer expectations, network=20
management and discrimination, and how open the Internet should be.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/21/AR200804...
2816.html
(requires registration)
* Writers stump for net neutrality (Associated Press)
http://www.siliconvalley.com/news/ci_9011164

TIA SUPPORTS FCC PROPOSALS FOR UPGRADES TO UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND
[SOURCE: TMCNet, AUTHOR: Susan J. Campbell]
The Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA)=20
vigorously supports pending Federal=20
Communications Commission proposals that call for=20
upgrades to the Universal Service Fund (USF).=20
These upgrades include the establishment of a=20
separate funding mechanism for broadband=20
services. The TIA believes that these changes=20
will facilitate widespread build-out of broadband=20
networks throughout the United States as well as=20
ensure that consumers in underserved and unserved=20
areas can also benefit from next-generation=20
products and services. In its comments, the TIA=20
urges the Commission to create a separate=20
technology and a competitively-neutral broadband=20
fund that will grow as funds are transitioned=20
from support for narrowband services.
http://businessvoip.tmcnet.com/topics/benefits/articles/25637-tia-suppor...
fcc-proposals-upgrades-universal-service-fund.htm

ELECTIONS & MEDIA

APRIL 14-20: OBAMA AND CLINTON DEBATE THE DEBATE
[SOURCE: Project for Excellence in Journalism, AUTHOR: Mark Jurkowitz]
Two major story lines drove press coverage in the=20
last full week before the long-awaited Democratic=20
Pennsylvania primary. The first was continued=20
fallout over Obama=92s remarks that some=20
economically struggling citizens get =93bitter=94 and=20
=93cling=94 to guns or religion. That subject=20
accounted for 25% of all the campaign coverage=20
last week. The second major story line, which=20
accounted for another 22% of the coverage, was=20
the ABC debate, which sparked its own debate over=20
whether Obama bore the brunt of too many gaffe=20
and =93gotcha=94 questions. Washington Post TV critic=20
Tom Shales, among the critical reviewers,=20
criticized the moderators=92 performances as=20
=93shoddy=94 and =93despicable.=94 New York Times=20
columnist David Brooks spoke for the opposing=20
view when he lauded the questions, declaring that=20
the =93journalist=92s job is to make politicians=20
uncomfortable.=94 In either event, the controversy=20
marked the clearest example of the media being=20
injected into the middle of the campaign since=20
the much-criticized Feb. 21 New York Times story=20
suggesting an improper relationship between John McCain and a female lobbyi=
st.
http://www.journalism.org/node/10720

AS PA PRIMARY HEATS UP, MORE IN THE MEDIA INVEST IN RACE
[SOURCE: Baltimore Sun, AUTHOR: David Zurawik]
Despite concerns that downsizing has left the=20
news media diminished in their ability to report=20
big stories, news outlets have rarely been more=20
ambitious than they are today covering one of the=20
biggest in decades -- the race for the White=20
House. Much has been written this year about 24/7=20
cable news channels and their wall-to-wall=20
coverage of the candidates. But CNN, MSNBC and=20
Fox are not the only news operations that are=20
committing more resources than ever to politics=20
-- and offering voters more information than=20
during any other election in American history. As=20
Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama head into=20
the home stretch of their Democratic primary=20
showdown in Pennsylvania on April 22, a wide=20
range of outlets -- from national to regional and=20
local, in new and old media -- are going further=20
than ever to bring viewers, listeners and readers the story.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bal-al.election20apr20,0,24457...
story

WITH KEYSTONE STATE NOW A KEY STATE, SPEND SOARS
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Ira Teinowitz]
The Democratic primary was supposed to be over by=20
now, with Pennsylvania voters casting ballots in=20
a decided race and media outlets lucky to get=20
even the scraps of primary season. Instead, the=20
Keystone State could see as much as $25 million=20
in spending as Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack=20
Obama engage in the first drawn-out negative-ad=20
battles of election '08. With Ms. Clinton trying=20
to save her political life and Mr. Obama trying=20
to seal the deal once and for all, both=20
candidates have been aggressively upping the ante=20
in ad buys. As of early last week, nearly $21=20
million had been spent in the state -- nearly $18=20
million on advertising, most of it on broadcast=20
ads, according to TNS Media Intelligence's=20
Campaign Media Analysis Group. Comcast Spotlight,=20
the main vehicle for spot cable, got about $3=20
million. By Tuesday the total could approach $25=20
million. (Iowa saw $42 million in broadcast=20
spending but with far more candidates in the race.)
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=3D126534

VOTERS TUNED IN, TURNED OFF
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Clare Ansberry, Suzanne Vranica]
At what point do campaign advertisements become=20
counterproductive? As Pennsylvanians finally=20
vote, Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama=20
might have provided an answer. In one week alone,=20
each candidate unveiled five different television=20
ads. With spending estimated at $20 million=20
state-wide, this battle of primary ads is=20
expected to be one of the biggest ever. On an=20
average day in the state's capital, Harrisburg,=20
228 television ads ran, according to Campaign=20
Media Analysis Group, a research company owned by=20
TNS Media Intelligence. The candidates ran ads on=20
"Oprah" in the mornings, "Days of Our Lives" in=20
the afternoon and "American Idol" in the evening.=20
Each left a mark on "Without a Trace." There was=20
little escape; 94% of registered Democrats had=20
seen a TV ad for Sen. Obama, and 88% had seen an ad for Sen. Clinton.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120882873447033475.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
e_one
(requires subscription)

CBS'S DEM DEBATE OFFICIALLY CANCELED
[SOURCE: MediaBistro]
CBS News can't catch a break. The network's hopes=20
for hosting a primary debate have been officially=20
dashed. The North Carolina Democratic party=20
announced they are canceling plans for Sunday's=20
debate because they could not get a commitment=20
from Sen. Barack Obama. The face-off was to be=20
moderated by Katie Couric and Bob Schieffer with a plum spot after 60 Minut=
es.
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/politics/cbss_dem_debate_officially_...
celed_82906.asp
* CBS Democratic Debate Canceled
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6553564.html

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

NEWS CORP NEARS DEAL TO BUY NEWSDAY
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Merissa Marr]
Apparently, the Tribune Company is closing in on=20
an agreement to sell its Long Island newspaper=20
Newsday to News Corp. for about $580 million.=20
Final details are being hammered out and a deal=20
could yet fall apart, but Tribune and News Corp.=20
have informally agreed on key aspects, including=20
the price, structure and governance. Under the=20
terms being discussed, Newsday would be part of a=20
joint venture with News Corp.'s New York Post and=20
various non-newspaper assets owned by News Corp=20
which would own the bulk of the combination, with=20
Tribune retaining a stake of less than 5%. If a=20
deal is struck, it would be Tribune's first major=20
newspaper sale since Chicago real-estate magnate=20
Sam Zell took effective control of the company in=20
December. Zell has been exploring ways to pare=20
the company's heavy debt load, which piled up=20
after it was taken private in an $8.2 billion=20
buyout. It would be the second newspaper=20
acquisition by News Corp. in several months,=20
following the company's $5.16 billion acquisition=20
of The Wall Street Journal's parent, Dow Jones,=20
in December. The Newsday joint venture is=20
expected to wipe out as much as $50 million in=20
annual losses News Corp. now incurs on the Post,=20
with the combined Newsday-Post operation earning roughly $50 million
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120883219590433735.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)
* Tribune agrees to sell Newsday to Murdoch company, source says (Reuters)
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-newsday22apr22,1...
61665.story

XM, SIRIUS STILL HAVE MUCH TO PROVE
[SOURCE: TheStreet.com, AUTHOR: Robert Holmes]
XM and Sirius Satellite Radio face concerns over=20
subscriber adds, rising churn rates and lower=20
revenue per subscriber. While many expect the=20
Federal Communications Commission to follow in=20
the Justice Department's footsteps in granting=20
regulatory approval, there are fundamental=20
problems that many Wall Street analysts cannot=20
look past as the satellite operators focus more=20
on the merger than on their respective business.
http://www.thestreet.com/_more/s/xm-sirius-still-have-much-to-prove/news...
lysis/hardware/10412753.html?

BROADCASTING

'FREE' DTV CONVERTER BOXES CAN'T BE RETURNED?
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: ]
Have you read the fine print on your National=20
Telecommunications and Information=20
Administration-issued digital-to-analog converter=20
box program coupon? "You will not be able to=20
receive cash or credit for the coupon amount, but=20
you can receive cash or credit for any amount you=20
paid out of pocket, if the store policy permits."=20
But if you get a defective DTV converter box--or=20
even if you don't like the one you bought--you=20
can take it back for another one, depending on=20
the store's return policy. Of course, the best=20
option to make sure you get a good box the first time.
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9924380-7.html?part=3Drss&subj=3Dnews&tag=
=3D2547-1_3-0-5

WIRELESS/SPECTRUM

D BLOCK: LOOKING BACK AND MOVING FORWARD
[SOURCE: RCRWireless News, AUTHOR: Jeffrey Silva]
What's next for the D Block spectrum? That=92s the=20
predicament facing the Federal Communications=20
Commission in the aftermath of the failure to=20
attract a bidder willing to cough up $1.3 billion=20
for the national commercial/public- safety=20
license in the recently completed 700 MHz=20
auction. A House telecom subcommittee hearing=20
generated a handful of ideas on how to craft=20
rules for the D-Block re-auction. Interspersed in=20
the brainstorming session were assessments of=20
what went right and what went wrong with the=20
auction. In the end, nothing close to a consensus=20
emerged. Whether other wireless issues will muddy=20
the waters in fashioning new D-Block guidelines=20
remains to be seen. Time is not on the FCC=92s=20
side. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told House=20
telecom committee members he wants to re-auction=20
the D Block later this year, a timeframe that=20
roughly coincides with the presidential election.=20
Though bidding rang up a record $19 billion, some=20
lawmakers and one witness suggested the FCC could=20
have generated far more revenue if conditions had=20
not been attached to key 700 MHz licenses.
http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=3D/20080419/SUB/6076049...
1005/whitepapers

CTIA COMMENTS ON THE FCC'S PROPOSED USF REFORMS
[SOURCE: WirelessWeek, AUTHOR: Teresa von Fuchs]
The lobbying organization for the wireless=20
industry, CTIA, has filed comments in the Federal=20
Communications Commission current universal=20
service proceeding. CTIA said that the need for=20
reform within the Universal Service Fund (USF) is=20
=93urgent,=94 yet calls for the FCC to look at the=20
success of subsidies in aiding carriers to deploy=20
networks to rural areas. The FCC has been=20
discussing possible solutions to ease the growing=20
demands on the dwindling USF, while still aiding=20
telecoms that provide needed communication=20
services to underserved areas. On Jan. 29, the=20
commission issued three proposed rulemaking=20
reforms for the fund: the Joint Board=92s high-cost=20
reform recommendation, identical support rule and=20
reverse auctions proposal. While CTIA says it=20
recognizes that =93excessive subsidy levels can be=20
as detrimental=85as too little support,=94 CTIA=20
recommends instead of subsidy caps that the=20
Commission should =93adopt specific goals for the=20
program and performance metrics to measure its=20
achievement of those goals.=94 Specifically CTIA=20
recommends reforms that reward efficiency. CTIA=20
said that it supports the Joint Board=92s proposal=20
to set aside dedicated funding for the creation=20
and deployment of mobility and broadband, but=20
urged the Commission to create a functional=20
definition of =93broadband=94 rather than rigid speed=20
requirements, as it plans to better support the=20
deployment of broadband networks in underserved areas.
http://www.wirelessweek.com/article.aspx?id=3D159370

QUICKLY

E-RATE CONTRACT DRAWS FIRE
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Dennis Pierce]
A five-year, $28 million contract awarded to=20
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)=20
to manage the information systems used to=20
administer the federal E-rate has some E-rate=20
service providers crying foul. Because SAIC also=20
is a service provider under the program, critics=20
say the deal represents a huge conflict of=20
interest and could give SAIC a competitive=20
advantage in bidding for other E-rate-related=20
business. The Universal Service Administrative=20
Company (USAC), the independent, not-for-profit=20
corporation that administers the $2.25=20
billion-a-year E-rate, says it has put safeguards=20
into place to prevent such abuse. But some E-rate=20
service providers say these safeguards are not=20
enough, and they accuse USAC of applying a double=20
standard: one for the way it conducts its own=20
business, and another, much more stringent standard for E-rate applicants.
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/?i=3D53581;_hbguid=3D2d2d42d4-e...
-4a88-9f99-25477152a42a

BUSH SEEKS GAME SHOW HELP ON FEDERAL BUDGET
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Dean Goodman]
Take the message to the people. That's what=20
President George W. Bush has always been about.=20
That's why he made the highly unusual appearance=20
on US television game show "Deal or No Deal,"=20
seeking show host Howie Mandel's help to deal=20
with the federal budget in upcoming talks with Congress.
http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2148147520080422
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

The Alliance for Public Technology
&
The Children's Partnership

invite you to bring a bag lunch and join us for another discussion in the

Broadband Changed My Life! Series

Thursday, May 15, 2008
12:00 noon - 1:30 p.m.

APT Conference Room
919 Eighteenth Street, NW * 10th Floor * Washington, DC

Speakers

Joy Howell
APT’s Broadband Changed My Life!TM Campaign Director

Laurie Lipper
Founder, Co-President, The Children's Partnership

Ken Kelly
Director, Washington, DC Office, The Children's Partnership

Copies of the new TCP issue brief : An Issue Brief for Leaders for Children and State Fact Sheets on technology and youth will be available to everyone who attends.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RSVP to apt@apt.org or (202) 263-2970
Sign language interpreters available upon request.



Behind Military Analysts, the Pentagon’s Hidden Hand

To the public, a group of retired military officers are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as “military analysts” whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world. Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance. The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air. Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administration’s war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?ref=todaysp...
(requires registration)

Pentagon's Media Manipulation on War Extended to Newspapers
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...

A Guide to 'NYT' Scoop on Pentagon's Media Propaganda
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...

Cabinet Officials Cite Concerns About Senate Version of Reporter's Shield Law

Bush Cabinet members with national security responsibilities are sending letters to Senate leaders about the Free Flow of Information Act. The bill would protect a reporter's source unless a federal judge, "by a preponderance of the evidence," ruled that the identity sought is "essential to the resolution of the matter." In a criminal case, the judge must determine that "there are reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has occurred." In their letter, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey and Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell point out that the new bill would require proving that a document is "properly classified," raising the prospect that "every leak investigation" would become "a mini-trial over the propriety of the government's classification system." It would also require proving that the leaker "had authorized access" to the classified information, when the purpose of the subpoena to the reporter is to find out who that person is, they said. They also say proving that the information the leaker disclosed caused "harm to national security" would "lead to time-consuming litigation," which itself could require exposing other classified secrets. Finally, they note that the terrorism exception is prospective only and would not help authorities identify sources in terrorist acts that had occurred. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates argues that the broad class of people given legal protection as journalists in the bill "would have the unintended consequence of encouraging unauthorized disclosures" of classified information by leakers who believe they are protected. Gates also wrote that it would increase the nation's "vulnerability to adversaries' counterintelligence efforts to recruit" journalists. Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman, whose agency runs the U.S. nuclear weapons complex, joined Gates in saying the bill could encourage "dissemination of classified information by giving leakers a formidable shield behind which they can hide." Michael Chertoff, secretary of Homeland Security, stressed in his letter the need to carry out quickly probes of terrorist activities and other threats. But he said the "evidentiary burdens to obtaining critical information from anyone who can claim to be a journalist . . . ensure that criminals have opportunities to avoid detection, continue their potentially dangerous operations, and further obfuscate their illegal activities." Whether these concerns are all valid, they deserve to be weighed publicly. At the minimum, they have led Mukasey and McConnell to tell the Senate leadership that if the present Senate measure were sent to the president, "his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the bill."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/20/AR200804...
(requires registration)

Protecting a Basic Freedom
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] Contrary to the administration’s claims, enacting a federal shield law would not harm national security. What it would do is allow the robust reporting that is essential for both the country’s safety and its freedom.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/opinion/21mon3.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)

List of McCain Fund-Raisers Includes Prominent Telecom Lobbyists

Senator John McCain has staked his campaign for the presidency in large part on his reputation as a reformer intent on curbing the influence of money in politics. But an examination by The New York Times of a list of 106 elite fund-raisers who have brought in more than $100,000 each for Sen McCain found that about a sixth of them were lobbyists. The list of "bundlers" was released on Friday by the McCain campaign. The sizable number of lobbyists, who are outnumbered on the list only by those working in the financial services industry, offers another example of the balancing act that Sen McCain, the Republican nominee, is having to strike as he campaigns for the presidency and seeks to maintain his reputation as a reformer. Several of McCain's top fund-raisers, for example, lobby for the telecommunications industry, which regularly does business before the Senate Commerce Committee, where Sen McCain is a senior member and once served as chairman. Kirk Blalock, of the lobbying firm Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock, leads McCain's young professional group and has raised over $250,000 for him; his clients include Sprint Nextel and Viacom. Kyle McSlarrow, chief of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, the lobbying arm for the cable industry, has raised over $100,000 for McCain. He and others in the cable industry recently butted heads with Sen McCain over a proposal that would allow customers to pick and choose which channels they received. In an interview Sunday, Wayne Berman, who is deputy finance chairman of the McCain campaign and a veteran lobbyist whose clients include Verizon and Verizon Wireless, dismissed the notion that some lobbyists might be raising money for Sen McCain to curry influence. "When it comes to McCain," Mr. Berman said, "there's just absolutely no concern whatsoever that he is going to be influenced by lobbyists. He takes on issues as he sees them. It doesn't matter whether his best friends are on the other side or not."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/us/politics/21bundlers.html?ref=todays...
(requires registration)

Rep Doyle Sees Broadband Allies in Clinton, Obama

As an uncommitted superdelegate in Pennsylvania, home of next week's potentially make-or-break primary, Rep. Mike Doyle has been a popular fellow with the Democratic presidential candidates of late. "I have had the opportunity to sit down with both Sen. [Hillary] Clinton [D-NY] and Sen. [Barack] Obama [D-IL]," he said. "I think both of them understand the importance of encouraging innovation and that the best way to do that is to have competition. I feel very confident that both of these candidates are going to encourage the type of policies that will help us grow the Internet and broadband." For Rep Doyle, those are policies that encourage open access. "We want to see broadband deployment across every part of this country,” he said. “We want it to be accessible, we want it to be affordable, and we want it to grow.” Rep Doyle added, "I'm satisfied that we have allies in the White House on that regard" if either Sen Obama or Sen Clinton are elected. Rep Dolye said that the House Telecommunications & Internet Subcommittee has concerns about how the Federal Communications Commission does its job but said he is reserving judgment on whether information at the FCC is being "filtered" so that "not all of the commissioners get all the information" and gave FCC chairman Kevin Martin a pretty good grade overall. Asked to grade Martin, Rep Doyle gave him a "B to B-minus." He called him "very smart" and "very politically savvy" and said he has "a genuine interest in the issues of the committee." He also said that while Martin can come across as heavy-handed, he also found him to be willing to discuss the issues they disagreed on.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6552735.html?rssid=193

Telecom Subcommittee Vice Chairman Gives Martin Good Grade
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6552654.html?rssid=193

China vaults past USA in number of Internet users

China, already the world leader in cellphone use, has surpassed the USA as the No. 1 nation in Internet users. The number of Chinese on the Internet hit more than 220 million as of February, according to estimates from official Chinese statistics by the Beijing-based research group BDA China. The government is likely to confirm the leap at its half-yearly report in July. The longtime Internet leader, the USA, which founded and developed the network of computers, had 216 million users at the end of 2007, according to Nielsen/NetRatings. The percentage of American users — 71% — still exceeds China's 17%. China has 1.3 billion people, compared with nearly 304 million in the USA. China, however, has a higher growth rate, says BDA's chairman, Duncan Clark. By the end of March, for example, Chinese users climbed to 233 million. At the end of 2007, China's Internet users reached 210 million, a jump of 53% from the previous year, says Zhang Shanshan, media director for the China Internet Network Information Center, which gathers statistics for the Ministry of Information Industry. Clark says the rapid growth is powered in part by China's economic boom.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080421/1a_bottomstrip21.art.htm

In Politics, the Gaffe Goes Viral

Sen Hillary Clinton's strategy seems to be to hold up Sen Barack Obama just short of the finish line and Sen Obama, a rookie to national politics, would make a mistake and a bored, crabby national press corps would pounce. Based on the debate that ran on ABC last week, it just might work. And while it’s tempting to blame ABC, Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos for the focus on lapel pins, “bitter” remarks and faint ties to the Weather Underground — and we will blame them soon — the news media’s values haven’t really changed. The nature of campaigns has. Gaffes now enter a supercharged ecosystem of cable, bloggers and digitally enabled mainstream media outlets. A slip of the tongue — or a clear view into a candidate’s soul, depending on your politics — can be game-changing because there are so many other people covering the game in so many ways. And nothing is more viral than a screw-up. Witness the uproar after Sen Obama’s remarks about “bitter” voters finding succor in God, guns and great big fences. Sen Obama was speaking at a small fund-raiser in San Francisco to a group of supporters in an event everyone assumed was off the record. Well, not everybody. As it turned out, the media member who threw Sen Obama under the bus was never really on it. Mayhill Fowler, a blogger for Off the Bus, the joint effort between the Huffington Post and Jay Rosen, a journalism professor (and Obama supporter), reported out his remarks from the fund-raiser. After she reluctantly posted a remark that she knew would feed her candidate into a digital wood-chipper, rapid-fire linking was followed by umbrage-filled analytics. Thus, another cable news controversy was born.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/business/media/21carr.html?ref=todaysp...
(requires registration)

A Volatile Election Campaign All in One Place
A look at Time magazine's "the Page" and senior political analyst Mark Halperin.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/business/media/21halperin.html?ref=tod...
(requires registration)

Broadcasters to Office of Government Information Services: Start Slowly

Broadcasters and others are weighing in on how to break the government logjam of unanswered Freedom of Information Act requests, which they argued means not trying to do too much, too soon. The Sunshine in Government Initiative -- which includes the National Association of Broadcasters and the Radio-Television News Directors Association -- Friday released recommendations to the National Archives and Records Administration for setting up the Office of Government Information Services. The OGIS is part of an effort to make the government more responsive to such requests from journalists and ordinary citizens. It will mediate disputes over requests to help ease the process and avoid expensive trips to court by media companies seeking to get the process going. It was created by Congress last year but does not yet have any money appropriated to run it.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6552765.html?rssid=193

Political TV Ads Uneven, Backloaded

All ships are not rising with the tide of political TV advertising. The reason: Election-cycle spending is uneven so far. The entire TV medium is still in line to be awash with $3 billion in 2008 political advertising, which is up from $2.4 billion in 2006 and $1.7 billion in 2004, according to political ad spend researcher TNS-CMAG (the latter acronym is for Campaign Media Analysis Group). But behind that happy 2008 total are two unsettling wrinkles for TV stations: Geographic distribution is uneven and the big spending may arrive weeks later than the traditional mid-summer. This election season's quirks stem from the lengthy race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party presidential nomination. In past presidential races, the two main party nominees had emerged weeks earlier. The uncertainty holds back ad spending in the presidential race because even the Republicans, which have a presumptive nominee, aren't sure which Democrat to target. More significantly, there's other political spending for Congress, state, local and advocacy groups, which take their cues from the two party standard-bearers. Any late arrival of political ads—meaning a backloading phenomenon—looks to hurt TV stations because the real economic boon is tightening up commercial inventory, which indirectly drives up TV ad prices for other classes of advertisers. Federal Election Commission rules guarantee candidates the lowest unit price for airtime, so candidate ads alone aren't gushers. If the political ads are late in arriving, the general tightening of TV commercial inventory will be limited.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6553031.html