February 2009

Senate Passes $838 Billion Economic Stimulus Bill

On Tuesday, Senators voted 61 to 37 to approve the economic stimulus bill. Only three Republicans voted in favor of it. In the House, an $819 billion version of the package passed Jan. 28 with no Republican support. The package now heads to a House-Senate conference to resolve differences between the two versions. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said after today's vote that House and Senate conferees would start working immediately to resolve differences. "I think the differences really are fairly minor," he said. "I think we can get most of our work done in the next 24 hours." Sen Reid said he and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) met with Obama early this morning and heard his views on what should be in the final bill. "His differences with the bill we have here are very, very minimal," the Senate Democratic leader said. President Barack Obama, who hopes to sign the resulting bill into law before Presidents' Day on Monday, has publicly encouraged negotiators in recent days to restore some education provisions that were stripped from the Senate version to reduce its overall cost. The Senate version of the bill includes $7 billion to improve deployment of broadband networks in the US; the House bill allocates $6 billion. Both bills include $650 million to unclog the DTV-to-analog converter box program. In a letter sent to House and Senate leadership today, Free Press voiced strong support for broadband stimulus and urged members of the conference committee to ensure that key provisions remain in the final bill. In particular, the letter highlights the importance of funding broadband grant programs over tax credits, targeting support only toward new investments, upholding clear openness conditions, applying forward-looking speed benchmarks, and putting expert agencies in charge of administering the funds.

Confusing Internet Tax Credit Remains In Stimulus Bill

Lawmakers have been unsuccessful at changing confusing language in a sweeping economic stimulus bill that critics and analysts say could benefit Verizon Communications over other Internet service providers. An effort to narrow the bill's tax credit for extending Internet access to rural areas and regions without service has been stymied as the Senate moves toward a final vote on the bill. Now, congressional aides and lobbyists say the only option for changing the provision is influencing the closed-door negotiations between House and Senate lawmakers that will occur after a Senate vote. The House stimulus bill doesn't include any tax incentives for Internet investments. It is possible that the Senate's Internet tax credit proposal simply could get chucked in negotiations with House members. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Rockefeller (D-WV) had proposed a significant increase in the Senate bill's monetary benefits for carriers adding high-speed Internet service in places where there are few options for wiring up. But Rockefeller's amendment didn't make it in to the Senate's compromise package. Industry insiders say the Internet tax credit's vague language referencing "residential subscribers" of the highest-speed Internet services could be a huge benefit to Verizon because its fiber-based Internet offering for homes comes the closest to meeting the download speeds needed to qualify for the credit.

President Obama Again Pushes for Broadband

In Fort Myers (FL) campaign for passage of the stimulus bill, President Barack Obama again mentioned the broadband provisions of the plan. In talking about the fact that 90% of the jobs created will be in the private sector, he included, "Jobs constructing broadband Internet lines that reach Florida's rural schools and small businesses, so they can connect and compete with their counterparts anywhere in the world."

Obama Can't Sell Stimulus Without TV Ads

As President Barack Obama prepares to give his first prime-time news conference tonight to sell his economic stimulus package to the public, he finds himself fighting this political battle without one of his most powerful weapons: TV advertising. During the campaign, Obama's extraordinary fundraising gave him the ability to communicate to the public directly through his TV ads. Since the start of the general election, he spent, on average, $11 million per week communicating with voters through TV. This unfiltered messaging proved to be one of candidate Obama's biggest strengths last fall. Since he took office in January, however, Obama has relied on a series of press conferences and the usual presidential forums to get his message to the American public. This strategy allows members of the opposition, as well as the press, to filter the information. As seen by the PR difficulties faced by the president regarding his stimulus package, it prevents Obama from effectively selling his product on a mass scale like he was able to do as a candidate.

Broadband Internet Access and the Digital Divide

It is expected that the Obama Administration will ultimately develop a national broadband policy or strategy that will seek to reduce or eliminate the "digital divide" with respect to broadband. It is likely that elements of a national broadband policy, in tandem with broadband investment measures in the American Recovery and Reinvestment stimulus package will significantly shape and possibly expand federal policies and programs to promote broadband deployment and adoption. A key issue is how to strike a balance between providing federal assistance for unserved and underserved areas where the private sector may not be providing acceptable levels of broadband service, while at the same time minimizing any deleterious effects that government intervention in the marketplace may have on competition and private sector investment.

Benton: Universal broadband a necessity

As Congress debates an economic stimulus package that includes funding to boost the number of people in the United States with broadband Internet access, at least one organization says access alone isn't enough--and it's urging the Obama administration to adopt strategies to stimulate broadband demand. The Benton Foundation, a private foundation that works to ensure media and telecommunications serve the public interest and enhance democracy, issued its urgent call to action--titled "Action Plan for America: Using Technology and Innovation to Address Our Nation's Critical Challenges"--before Congress drafted its stimulus legislation. The report has taken on new importance, however, as broadband funding has become mired in a tense political debate on Capitol Hill.

Tech for America

Should we spend stimulus money on building a broadband utopia or on transforming health care? Or both? The problem with calling for any government funding of technology is that the future always sounds terrific. Who doesn't want cheap Internet everywhere, an end to medical errors, and an electric system that could change the way we drive? Sketched out like this—a series of plans that promises radical advancements after a relatively small investment of resources—it seems crazy not to sign up for every one of these ideas. After all, the U.S. government has played a huge role in the inception of nearly every modern innovation we enjoy today. Government research grants were present at the creation of microprocessors, databases, the graphical user interface, video games, the Internet, and the World Wide Web, among many other great things. But spending on tech can be very tricky. Advocates for a high-tech stimulus aren't calling for much research money. Instead they're arguing for spending at a more advanced stage of development—they envision the government sponsoring the creation and deployment of ready-to-use technology. And we're all familiar with spectacular government-funded tech failures at that stage—think missile defense, the terminally broken computer systems built for the IRS and the FBI, and the Census Bureau's stalled effort to automate its data collection.

Utilities Watchdog says Illinois residents overspending on phone

Illinois residents are over-paying their phone bills by almost $575 a year, according to a report released Tuesday by the Citizens Utility Board. The utility watchdog analyzed more than 32,000 local, long-distance and cell phone bills of Illinois consumers and found that the majority are paying for minutes and services they don't need. The CUB report determined that the average Illinois customer could save $187.15 a year by switching to cheaper local calling plans like "Consumer Choice" and by dropping services like "line-backer," which covers wire repairs that typically are needed only every 20 to 30 years. Long-distance callers could save about $60 annually by changing to lower-cost providers that charge less than 3 cents a minute for long-distance calls, the CUB study determined. AT&T and other national carriers typically charge 5 cents to 10 cents a minute for the same calls, Mr. Kolata said. Cell phone users waste an average of $308.28 a year on unused minutes and unnecessary plan upgrades like roadside assistance, according to the CUB report. Mr. Kolata said typical cell phone users pay for 420 unused peak minutes every year. The collective savings on phone services, he said, could add up to a $1.5-billion boost to the Illinois economy if all residents trimmed their bills based on CUB's recommendations.

Court Rules Against Verizon On Marketing Practices

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has upheld the Federal Communications Commission's order to Verizon to stop using information gained as a result of the switch of a phone provider to cable to try to retain that customer with added incentives. Cable operators, and phone companies, must notify each other about the migration of a phone customer from one to the other for purposes of "porting" the old number. That notice of the impending loss of a customer could also be a last ditch opportunity to try to keep that customer. Comcast, Time Warner and Brighthouse had complained to the FCC that Verizon's attempts to do just that violated Telecommunications Act restrictions on carrier's use of proprietary information for marketing purposes. The FCC agreed, eventually, and told Verizon to stop doing it.

DirecTV Hikes Rates

DirecTV will raise monthly rates on programming packages an average of 4% effective March 4, and while the increases are in line with other video providers one Wall Street analyst said the satellite leader could be more vulnerable to "recession-related downgrades" than cable competitors. DirecTV's Select package, for example, will increase to $48.99 per month, up 6.5% from $45.99 previously. The Plus HD-DVR tier is being hiked to $75.99 per month, up 4.1% from $72.99. The Basic tier will be $12.99 per month, a 30% increase $9.99 previously, while the Family package will remain unchanged at $29.99 per month. According to DirecTV spokesman Robert Mercer, the new pricing reflects the increasing cost of programming as well as the "significant investments we've made to enhance our customers' viewing experience." Sanford Bernstein senior analyst Craig Moffett, in a research note Monday, said DirecTV's price hikes come on the heels of similar increases at Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cablevision Systems, AT&T and Dish Network.