October 2009

Senate Republicans Are Holding Up Key Nominees

For all the bellyaching about the Obama administration's supposed excess of policymaking czars outside the normal appointment process, Senate Republicans have been blocking confirmation of a disturbing number of administration nominees, many for reasons having nothing to do with their suitability for their jobs. No one has clean hands here. Slow-walking nominations is a bipartisan sport. Democrats also pulled this stunt -- often as a gambit to dislodge documents that they believed the Bush administration was improperly withholding. The Obama administration's quick start on making nominations has slowed to a trickle, lessening the pressure on the Senate to deal with the backlog. And, ultimately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has the power to force a vote on a pending nomination -- if he wants to take the time to do it. Nonetheless, that's no excuse for letting advise and consent degenerate into sit around and wait. Until Tuesday, when Tom Perez was confirmed as assistant attorney general for civil rights -- more than six months after being nominated -- five of 11 assistant attorney general positions were unfilled.

Trusting the blogosphere

[Commentary] The Web and social networking tools such as Facebook and Twitter have elevated individuals' influence and transformed word-of-mouth into a global force. Recognizing the shift, some marketers have tried to insinuate their pitches into the grass-roots commentary, often by rewarding the people who sing their products' praises. Under new Federal Trade Commission guidelines, wherever an advertiser sponsors a message, its involvement has to be disclosed. But the FTC's examples of what constitutes sponsorship set an unreasonably low threshold for blog posts to be treated as ads, potentially turning ethical lapses into violations of federal law. Merely receiving review copies of games, gadgets or discs for free -- as critics in traditional media routinely do -- could bring bloggers under the FTC's purview. The commission argues that the guidelines probably wouldn't apply to professional journalists, and that amateur bloggers would just have to disclose the freebies. Yet the risk of $11,000 penalties could easily discourage some would-be reviewers and harm sites that rely on amateurs to rate products and services. There's also a practical problem. E-commerce sites and social networks are generating an overwhelming amount of information about products and services, only some of which is genuine. Yet the best thing about the Internet is that the masses do a remarkable job of calling out fakery and unethical behavior. Many websites help in this process by giving users effective tools for rating a reviewer's credibility. The result is a wealth of feedback that provides great insights for consumers. As it tries to crack down on deceptive practices online, the FTC should take care not to cut off that flow of information.

Investigative Reporting: Not Dead Yet

Investigative reporting has long been a way for TV stations to promote themselves, build journalistic reputations and, often, improve lives in their communities. But many stations have been cutting back on their investigative teams or eliminating them altogether. They can no longer justify the high costs of dedicating reporters, producers and other resources to digging out and presenting good, tough news stories. Financially troubled owners and managers are more interested in building audiences and revenue than they are reputations.

United States Lags in Innovation Policy, Needs Federal Funding, Says ITIF

The United States is lagging in technology innovation, thanks to a federal policy that has not kept up to pace with the speed of innovation changes, panelists said at an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation event on Tuesday. Unlike in the days when federal funding was used to fund research projects, innovation changed over the past 30 years. According to Howard Wial of Brookings Institution, large firms which were making initially investing in research have been doing less risky business investments, leaving innovation less funded. There needs to be a national innovation foundation which can advocate for funding which will be used for directing innovation ventures, he said. Such a foundation would also give grants to research, funding for economic based developments and support technology diffusion. It would also fund actors in technology-based institutions in order to provide trainings for the public.

The Problems with Obama's Innovation Strategy

[Commentary] Rae predicts that the Obama's Administration's planned investment in innovation will be wasted. Why?

1) Neither the U.S. government nor any agency within the U.S. government has a permanent place where a high-level view of the problem space is developed, priorities agreed, funding dispersed, and meaningful metrics and measures show success or failure.

2) Without any structure to support this new U.S. innovation strategy, there is no hope this funding will be spent efficiently.

3) The current state of government contracting laws supports convention, not innovation.

4) There is precious little money available for discovery-related activities that would help decide what type of strategies are needed when it comes to spending the type of big bucks this plan endorses.

5) The requirement for a detailed request for proposal is a recipe for innovation constipation.

6) Partisan bickering means there's little hope most of what is contained in the plan will be acted upon before quite some time.

Fiber Optics take home Physics Nobel Prize

For 2009, the Nobel Prize in Physics will be shared by Charles Kao, who works at the UK's Standard Telecommunication Laboratories, for his key contribution to the development of fiber optics. The basic concept behind fiber optics is simple: light traveling down a medium can be propagated indefinitely if it's surrounded by a material that has a slightly lower refractive index, allowing it to be reflected internally. The material that describes the award notes that scientists were demonstrating that light could be guided down water jets back in the 1850s, and glass-based devices were on the market roughly a century later. The problem was that the losses were too large for applications that transmitted light more than a few meters. The first glass fibers had lost 99 percent of the initial light within 20 meters, ruling them out as a medium for long distance communications. As the development of lasers made optical communications look inevitable, a variety of ways to improve the performance of transmission media were being explored. The Nobel cites Kao for avoiding the approach taken by others in the field, which involved looking at ways to improve the reflectance of the light. Instead, Kao focused on the material properties of the glass itself, figuring out why the light was actually being lost in the first place. Kao identified the impurities in glass that were causing problems, and calculated that, if they were eliminated, there would be a sweet spot of wavelengths between absorption in the infrared and Rayleigh scattering at shorter wavelengths. The right combination of materials and wavelength should drop the losses more than a thousand-fold compared to the current state of the art.

CTIA Tells FCC What Wireless Needs

On October 2, executives from CTIA-The Wireless Association met with Federal Communications Commission member Michael Copps and members of his staff to discuss the National Broadband Plan, "the value and innovation that mobile wireless services are delivering to consumers, and the unique characteristics of mobile wireless networks."

CTIA outlined key areas where Commission action is necessary to facilitate the continued leadership of the U.S., including:

1) Identification and allocation of additional licensed spectrum resources for U.S. wireless broadband providers. The U.S. is facing a brewing spectrum crisis, with its leading position in the mobile world standings at risk if the Federal Government doesn't soon focus on identifying and reallocating hundreds of megahertz of spectrum for licensed commercial use.

2) Grant of CTIA's Petition seeking a "shot clock" on local zoning authorities' consideration of tower siting applications and access to electric utility poles in recognition that timely deployment of wireless facilities is critical to ensuring consumers' access to wireless broadband services.

3) Commission action to speed access to AWS-1, BRS and 700 MHz spectrum that already has been assigned, but that is encumbered by other users - either unauthorized or subject to relocation.

Bringing Fiber to Schools, Libraries and Health Care Facilities

Nishi and John Windhausen -- Coordinator of the Schools, Health and Libraries Broadband Coalition -- met with members of the Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Plan team to discuss cost estimates for providing fiber optic connectivity to anchor institutions. Installing fiber to all community anchor institutions may cost $5-$10 billion with installation costs per site ranging from $10k-$200k depending on deployment technique and investment shared with other buildings.

Very Hot and Cold on Net Neutrality

[Commentary] What does the Network Neutrality debate mean to Smalltown, USA, and rural America? At its core, the net neutrality debate pits those who believe the Internet is a channel for open communications against those whose best financial interests lie in a controlled Internet. Net neutrality just ensures that if Joe's Local Hardware Emporium and Smallville Data Storage Co. both want to move 500 gigabits of data through a provider's network to the Internet, the provider can't show favoritism moving either company's data. If Smallville is moving 500 gigabits and Rural Telemed is moving 100 gigs, it's ok if Smallville pays more, but under net neutrality the operator cannot arbitrarily slow down RT's data traffic because they're the smaller customer. So don't let the incumbent PR blitz fool you. Net neutrality, applied fairly to big and small Internet service providers is good for consumers, businesses and providers.

AT&T to Allow VoIP Calls Over 3G Network; Skype Fans Rejoice (updated)

[Commentary] AT&T says it will soon allow Apple's iPhone to make VoIP telephony calls over its 3G network. Up until now, the VoIP apps used the Wi-Fi networks and were prevented from using the 3G connection. Skype and other VoIP providers had complained loudly about AT&T's clampdown. AT&T's capitulation shows that the carriers are losing much of their control over the consumer wireless experience. A big reason for that? Competition in the wireless markets.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski said, "When AT&T indicated, in response to the FCC's inquiry, that it would take another look at permitting VoIP on its 3G network I was encouraged. I commend AT&T's decision to open its network to VoIP. Opening wireless services to greater consumer choice will drive investment and innovation in the mobile marketplace."