March 2010

March 30, 2010 (Google, Verizon and the National Broadband Plan)

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 2010


INTERNET/BROADBAND
   Unleashing American Broadband
   Why Google & Verizon Won't Be BFFs Forever
   Google Gets in Bed With Verizon
   AT&T, Verizon Fault FCC Wireless Decision on Leases
   Cue the "Mission Impossible" Theme for Harbinger's LTE Plans
   Missouri Governor Supports 12 Broadband Stimulus Proposals

COMMUNITY MEDIA
   Better Coordination Needed to Map Local Media Ecologies

back to top

INTERNET/BROADBAND

UNLEASHING AMERICAN BROADBAND
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Eric Schmidt, Ivan Seidenberg]
[Commentary] Innovation in technology and business is one of America's major comparative advantages in the global information economy. That's why at least three key components of the Federal Communication Commission's recently released National Broadband Plan deserves attention: 1) recommendations around health care information technology, education, job training, and a smart electricity grid; 2) increasing access to the highest-quality broadband; and 3) making high-speed Internet connections available to all Americans. The Internet has thrived in an environment of minimal regulation. While our two companies don't agree on every issue, we do agree generally as a matter of policy that the framework of minimal government involvement should continue. [Schmidt is CEO of Google; Seidenberg is CEO of Verizon]
benton.org/node/33909 | Wall Street Journal | ars technica
Recommend this Headline
back to top


WHY GOOGLE AND VERIZON WON'T BE FRIENDS FOREVER
[SOURCE: GigaOm, AUTHOR: Stacey Higginbotham]
Google's and Verizon's joint op-ed in the Wall Street Journal manages to gloss over areas where the two firms differ, and instead highlights the fact that both favor the plan's proposals for faster speeds, its emphasis on universal access, as well as its push to move broadband deeper into the health, education and energy management fields. This isn't the first time Verizon and the search giant have worked together. They also joined forces to file joint comments on network neutrality (although they filed separately as well). I've long thought that it was more interesting to see where the two firms differ (much of their agreement on the net neutrality issue was superficial, especially when it came to wireless networks ), so why are they so visible teaming up? It's partly because neither firm wants to get the Federal Communications Commission even more involved in regulating them -- Google is worried about the agency attempting to police Internet applications and Verizon, about its focus on anything above transmission itself. This debate in itself is enough to drive both firms closer, but there are other theories about their budding relationship. While the two are friends in public and in the occasional FCC filing, the mutual interests of these two companies may be sorely tested when it comes time for the FCC to really dig into net neutrality, as well as when Congress and the FCC get into figuring out how to regulate the web.
benton.org/node/33908 | GigaOm | ars technica
Recommend this Headline
back to top


GOOGLE GETS IN BED WITH VERIZON
[SOURCE: The Huffington Post, AUTHOR: Josh Silver]
[Commentary] The Google-Verizon Wall Street Journal op-ed is mostly boring; until it gets to the punchline and tells us that government should have as little role as possible in delivering broadband to America. Just like government should stay out of banking regulation, I take it? Let me translate their rhetoric: The FCC's plan is great -- as long as they don't try to implement it. Or rather, as long as they don't do anything that doesn't fit within Verizon and Google's idea of "minimal government involvement." It's no accident that the CEOs don't try to explain what they mean. If they did, they would step directly into a big, steaming pile of hypocrisy. Most agree that the market is the preferred mechanism for achieving the goals of the nation in digital technology and infrastructure. If the market is working, government plays cheerleader. But, hello, the whole reason the Congress mandated a National Broadband Plan from the FCC is because the market isn't working; we're slipping perilously behind the rest of the world. The objectives set out in the plan, all of which are applauded by these companies -- world-class fiber networks, the expansion of broadband for universal availability and adoption, and the extension of broadband into every aspect of our lives -- aren't being delivered without government action. Like most big companies, Google and Verizon hate regulation and government involvement in business when it limits bad behavior and anti-competitive activity. But they absolutely love it when it helps them. In fact, both of these companies maintain small armies of lobbyists to ply the government for all the regulations that they want, even as they fight off all the regulations they don't want.
benton.org/node/33907 | Huffington Post, The | dslreports.com
Recommend this Headline
back to top


AT&T, VERIZON FAULT FCC WIRELESS DECISION ON LEASES
[SOURCE: Bloomberg, AUTHOR: Todd Shields]
AT&T and Verizon Wireless faulted federal regulators for adopting restrictions on airwave leases the two companies can negotiate with a wholesaler of wireless Internet service. The Federal Communications Commission on March 26 approved Harbinger Capital Partners Funds' acquisition of SkyTerra Communications, a Reston, Virginia-based provider of mobile satellite services that plans to sell access to operators of high-speed wireless data, or broadband, networks. The FCC required SkyTerra to seek approval before leasing capacity to "the largest or second-largest wireless provider," a condition Harbinger had proposed. Verizon Wireless, owned by Verizon Communications and Vodafone, is the biggest wireless company, followed by AT&T. "The commission is setting a very disturbing precedent when it implies that it may use allocation of spectrum to manipulate the wireless market," Jim Cicconi, AT&T's senior executive vice president for external and legislative affairs, said in an e-mailed statement. "This action is manifestly unwise and potentially unlawful." The requirements on Harbinger "do not prohibit any specific transactions," Paul de Sa, chief of the FCC's Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, said today in a blog posting. "They do provide some reassurance that the approval will ignite new broadband competition while protecting the public from any potential harms."
benton.org/node/33906 | Bloomberg | FCC
Recommend this Headline
back to top


HARBINGER'S LTE PLANS
[SOURCE: GigaOm, AUTHOR: Stacey Higginbotham]
[Commentary] Harbinger Capital Partner's bold plan to build out an open 4G wireless network has more moving parts than the latest OK Go video, and would require a minimum of $6 billion for the terrestrial and satellite infrastructure alone. Based on the expenses and the difficulty of building a cellular network, Higginbotham is skeptical that a competitive LTE network will come out of the plan. The proposed network will be expensive, hard to deploy and face opposition from AT&T and Verizon.
benton.org/node/33905 | GigaOm
Recommend this Headline
back to top


MISSOURI LIKE 12 BROADBAND PROPOSALS
[SOURCE: Governor Jay Nixon, AUTHOR: Press release]
Missouri Governor Jay Nixon (D) is supporting 12 different proposals from across Missouri that would expand broadband Internet access in rural and underserved parts of the state for health care, business, education and consumers. Those proposals - from private companies, local governments and rural electric cooperatives - have been submitted for federal funding through the Recovery Act. Missouri is partnering with those businesses and agencies to expand broadband through MoBroadbandNow, a five-year initiative launched by Gov. Nixon last summer. The initiative coordinates efforts to obtain funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of Commerce specifically set aside for broadband expansion. MoBrandbandNow seeks to expand broadband accessibility to 95 percent of the total population, a significant increase from current projected accessibility of 79.7 percent. Five of the applications supported by the State of Missouri are for developing middle-mile infrastructure for broadband; six are for developing last-mile projects; and one is for developing public computing centers, which will provide broadband access in public locations, often targeting a specific vulnerable population such as low-income, minority, disabled or unemployed Missourians.
benton.org/node/33904 | Governor Jay Nixon
Recommend this Headline
back to top

COMMUNITY MEDIA

BETTER COORDINATION NEEDED TO MAP LOCAL MEDIA ECOLOGIES
[SOURCE: MediaShift, AUTHOR: Jessica Clark]
[Commentary] Back in 2008, I co-organized a conference called Beyond Broadcast. That year's theme was "mapping public media," and was designed to both call out the rising importance of maps as a platform for sharing digital media, and to "map" the fragmented universe of public service media projects. The maps I found at the time underscored the siloed nature of news production. There were maps of public TV stations, community media projects, and citizen bloggers, all maintained separately by different entities and aimed at very different users. Such isolation made it difficult to trace the relationships between these different kinds of outlets in any one place. However, as concerns about local media ecologies have sharpened -- spurred in part by the focus of the Knight Commission on the information needs of communities -- such mapping has taken on a new urgency. Knight provides interested locales with a starting point: A simple survey for assessing the health of their information environment. The Knight Media Policy Initiative at the New America Foundation (NAF), where I'm now a fellow, has begun to develop a set of analyses of local media/governance ecologies. The goal is to "align policy recommendations with needs on the ground," said Tom Glaisyer, who is coordinating NAF's initiative, and plans to work with others seeking similar information. Various scans of the community media landscape have already been launched, including a survey by the Free Press, a field scan by NAMAC, and this crowdsourced directory of cable access stations.
benton.org/node/33903 | MediaShift
Recommend this Headline
back to top

March 29, 2010 (Google Searches for a Foreign Policy)

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for MARCH 29, 2010


GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
   Google Searches for a Foreign Policy
   Google Gets Little U.S. Corporate Support in Internet Fight With China

NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN
   Levin: Reclaiming Spectrum For Broadband Puts FCC On 'Right Side' Of History
   NCTA Weighs in on FCC's Broadband Speed Tests
   How Broadband Can Be the Backbone for a Green Economy
   Former FCC Chairman asks: Who steers the broadband plan?
   Transmission Project Lauds National Broadband Plan

MORE ON BROADBAND/INTERNET
   Approaches to Preserving the Open Internet
   The Digital Divide Will Ensure a Broadband Ghetto
   PE Firm Plans Open LTE Network to Challenge AT&T and Verizon
   House Lawmakers Voice Concern About Google Buzz
   The National Broadband Plan--A Work in Progress
   Verizon winds down expensive FiOS expansion

OWNERSHIP
   Vodafone confident of upper hand in Verizon fight
   Justice Will Not Challenge Cisco-Tandberg Deal

TELEVISION
   Senate Passes Paygo-Friendlier 10-Year STELA
   Networks turn clock back to family hour
   Stations Warned About Cash-Hungry States
   DC Court Rules Campaign Contribution Limits On Individuals is Unconstitutional

ED TECH
   From Chalk To Bytes: The Digital Classroom

STORIES FROM ABROAD
   Ofcom to act on broadband speeds
   Consumer Panel: UK's universal broadband commitment must meet consumer needs
   French pirates 'dodge' tough laws
   National plan is needed for emerging digital economy

back to top

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS

GOOGLE SEARCHES FOR A FOREIGN POLICY
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Mark Landler]
When Google announced that it would shut its censored online search service in China, it was doing more than standing up to a repressive government: it was showing that, with the United States still struggling to develop a foreign policy for the digital age, Internet companies need to articulate their own foreign policies. Google is hardly the first American company to stray into the State Department's bailiwick. Since the bad old days of the United Fruit Company in Latin America, powerful multinationals have conducted themselves like quasi-states, influencing the foreign lands in which they operate by deciding whether to accommodate or resist the unsavory practices of authorities there. For Internet companies, that choice has been sharpened by the fact that the World Wide Web is no longer just a force for freedom and diversity but also a tool for repression. Governments use it to spy on dissidents, human rights activists, and other troublesome elements. This change happened so fast that it left the foreign policy establishment gasping to catch up. It also exposed Washington's deep ambivalence about information technology: while it champions the free flow of ideas in closed societies like Iran, it fears being a target for cyber-attacks by hostile governments and doesn't want to export technology that could be diverted into military uses. Conflicted and confused, Foggy Bottom has little to offer Silicon Valley by way of support or even guidance.
benton.org/node/33868 | New York Times
Recommend this Headline
back to top


GOOGLE GETS LITTLE SUPPORT
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: ]
Google is using Internet freedom as a rallying cry in its confrontation with China. But the deafening silence from U.S. corporations underscores how increasingly isolated Google looks in its hope to rewrite the rules in the country with the biggest number of Internet users. Only GoDaddy.com, the Internet domain name and Web host company, immediately followed Google's lead in protesting Chinese policies. It said that it would no longer register domain names in China because of new rules requiring it to collect customers' photos. The action by GoDaddy, which has not been known in the past for taking a strong stance on Internet freedom, contrasts sharply with the modest responses from other companies. Microsoft, Yahoo and others have trumpeted the general principles of Internet freedom, but none have directly echoed Google's call for an end to Web censorship in China. And, GoDaddy aside, no other technology company has hinted at a change in business practices in China to protest regulations and restrictions there.
benton.org/node/33867 | Reuters
Recommend this Headline
back to top

NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN

BLAIR DEFENDS SPECTRUM RECOMMENDATIONS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Federal Communications Commission's Blair Levin said March 26 that he believed the national broadband plan's proposal to reclaim spectrum from broadcasters -- and other incumbent users -- put it on "the right side of history" and was one of the parts of the plan he was most proud of. In an interview with C-SPAN's Communicators series, Levin declined to comment directly on a recent speech by his former boss, then FCC Chairman Reed Hundt, that Hundt's plan had always been for broadband to replace broadcasting as the national medium. Levin said he would leave the media historian post to Hundt for now. But he said what was "certainly true" was that every country needed a "common medium that has certain characteristics." He did not elaborate on those, but he conceded that the FCC had made a number of decisions back then (in the mid-1990's) "that were useful to the Internet and to broadband." Levin said that it was the market driving the move to broadband. He cited a report in 2000 that found that 80% of the respondents would rather give up the Internet than TV, compared with today, when "a majority of people say they would rather give up television. If you look up the under-45 [age group], it is overwhelming. That is consumers speaking. That is the market speaking."
benton.org/node/33855 | Broadcasting&Cable
Recommend this Headline
back to top


NCTA WEIGHS IN ON FCC'S BROADBAND SPEED TESTS
[SOURCE: National Cable & Telecommunications Association, AUTHOR: Neal Goldberg]
In a letter to the Federal Communications Commission, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) says it shares the Commission's goal of providing consumers with additional relevant and meaningful data regarding the speed of their broadband connections and other appropriate network performance data -- and agrees that such information may help consumers to better choose among competing providers and choose the right plan for their needs. The National Broadband Plan contains some sound recommendations for achieving this objective, including the use of third-party contractors and the creation of an industry/consumer advisory council. But the Plan also relies heavily on results obtained from online speed tests to support its conclusion that there is a significant gap between the "actual" speed consumers experience and the "advertised" speed that providers offer. In this letter and in the attached report, we identify substantial shortcomings with using online speed tests to measure this purported gap. NCTA encourages the Commission, going forward, to focus on alternative measurement approaches that are likely to produce more accurate and meaningful data. NCTA says it look forward to working with the Commission and other stakeholders on these important issues and offer the following in the spirit of constructive collaboration.
benton.org/node/33849 | National Cable & Telecommunications Association
Recommend this Headline
back to top

MORE ON BROADBAND/INTERNET

APPROACHES TO PRESERVING THE OPEN INTERNET
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Press release]
The Federal Communications Commission today announced a public workshop for the FCC's Open Internet proceeding, entitled "Approaches to Preserving the Open Internet." The workshop will occur on April 28, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. PDT at the Jackson Federal Building, in Seattle, Washington. The workshop will address how the Internet's openness can best be preserved, including by examining historical and ongoing efforts to protect Internet openness in the United States and other countries, and by discussing the key technological, economic, and legal considerations relevant to the need for and substance of the Commission's proposed open Internet policies. The agenda and the list of participants in the workshop will be made available in mid-April. The workshop will be open to the public; however, admittance will be limited to the seating available. Audio/video coverage of the workshop will be broadcast live with open captioning over the Web.
benton.org/node/33851 | Federal Communications Commission
Recommend this Headline
back to top


THE DIGITAL DIVIDE
[SOURCE: GigaOm, AUTHOR: Stacey Higginbotham]
[Commentary] If you live in New York City or in any of the heavily populated and wealthy areas of the Northeast, you likely have access to some of the fastest broadband speeds available in the country. If you live in a suburb of Austin, Texas, however, you're offered speeds some six times slower for about half the price. And as the technologies race ahead for network access, ISPs with fiber to the home and cable-provided Docsis 3.0 service are going to surpass the speeds that providers using old-school copper and even wireless can offer. Which means that while some people will be living in the 21st century, great chunks of the country will be subsisting on the 2010 version of dial-up. Don't believe me? Verizon has tested a tech that requires software upgrades to deliver a 10 Gbps connection that's shared among 32 homes. Meanwhile, technologies such as the next generation from AT&T are going to require swapping out gear at the node and inside your home so the companies still using copper can squeak up to speeds that most analysts doubt will even reach 100 Mbps. That means a hundred-fold disparity in connection speeds. Holy cow.
benton.org/node/33861 | GigaOm
Recommend this Headline
back to top


HARBINGER 4G NETWORK
[SOURCE: GigaOm, AUTHOR: Stacey Higginbotham]
A New York private equity firm plans to build a multibillion-dollar 4G wireless network that will cover most of the country by 2015. The ambitious plan by Harbinger Capital Partners relies on deploying a Long Term Evolution network over spectrum owned by a few satellite companies — and would create an open wholesale wireless network available to retail companies, PC manufacturers or anyone who wants to offer mobile broadband. The new network will rely initially on 23 MHz spectrum owned by SkyTerra, which is owned by Harbinger, and could later include spectrum from Terrestar Networks, another satellite firm in which Harbinger holds a stake. The Harbinger network could help ensure competition among the major wireless carriers thanks to the conditions the FCC has placed on the spectrum that the private equity firm plans to use as part an agreement to let Harbinger take control of SkyTerra — namely that SkyTerra has to be a wholesaler, and that traffic from the largest and second-largest wireless carriers in the U.S. cannot comprise more than 25 percent of the traffic over the SkyTerra/Harbinger network. This means AT&T and Verizon could not buy up huge chunks of the network or spectrum to keep others off of it.
benton.org/node/33860 | GigaOm | FCC | Harbinger
Recommend this Headline
back to top


HOUSE LAWMAKERS CONCERNED ABOUT BUZZ
[SOURCE: CongressDaily, AUTHOR: Juliana Gruenwald]
A group of House Commerce Committee members are urging the Federal Trade Commission to investigate complaints that Google's Buzz social networking service and some of its other services may harm consumer privacy. In a letter sent to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, the lawmakers urged the agency to investigate whether Google disclosed personal information about its customers without their consent as part of the launch of Buzz in February. The letter also asks the FTC to probe how much Google uses personal information collected from Buzz and its other services to target ads and how Google's proposed acquisition of AdMob will affect how it delivers ads. "We are writing to express our concern over claims that Google's 'Google Buzz' social networking tool breaches online consumer privacy and trust," according to the letter signed by Reps. John Barrow (D-GA), who led the effort, Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), Mike Burgess (R-TX), G.K. Butterfield (D-NC), Tim Murphy (R-PA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Mike Rogers (R-MI), Steve Scalise (R-LA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and Commerce Committee ranking member Joe Barton (R-TX), and Del. Donna Christensen (D-Virgin Islands).
benton.org/node/33862 | CongressDaily
Recommend this Headline
back to top


A WORK IN PROGRESS
[SOURCE: Public Knowledge, AUTHOR: Rob Frieden]
[Commentary] The National Broadband Plan operates under the flawed presumption that broadband competition exists, or soon will flourish, with particular emphasis on wireless broadband options that currently have failed to match the bitrate deliver speeds of wireline options. Additionally, the Commission appears content with finding new wireless broadband spectrum for incumbent carriers, without considering whether the scope of competition, as well as broadband access and affordability might be enhanced by reserving some newly available spectrum for market entrants. The Plan avoids addressing network interconnection, neutrality and sharing requirements that other nations have adopted with measureable success.
benton.org/node/33859 | Public Knowledge
Recommend this Headline
back to top


VERIZON WINDS DOWN FIOS EXPANSION
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Peter Svensson]
If Verizon Communications Inc. hasn't already started wiring your city or town with its FiOS fiber-optic TV and broadband service, chances are you won't get it. Where it's available, FiOS usually provides the only competition for cable TV apart from satellite service. Studies have shown that its entry into an area leads to lower cable prices, though FiOS itself has not been undercutting cable TV prices substantially. But Verizon is nearing the end of its program to replace copper phone lines with optical fibers that provide much higher Internet speeds and TV service. Its focus is now on completing the network in the communities where it's already secured "franchises," the rights to sell TV service that rivals cable, said spokeswoman Heather Wilner. That means Verizon will continue to pull fiber to homes in Washington (DC), New York City and Philadelphia — projects that will take years to complete — but leaves such major cities as Baltimore and downtown Boston without FiOS.
benton.org/node/33858 | Associated Press
Recommend this Headline
back to top

OWNERSHIP

VODAFONE-VERIZON WIRELESS FEUD
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Andrew Parker]
Vodafone is increasingly confident that the balance of power in its tempestuous relationship with Verizon Communications is shifting in the UK mobile phone group's favour. Vodafone thinks its negotiating position with Verizon Communications over the future of Verizon Wireless, the US mobile phone operator that the two groups jointly own, is getting stronger, according to people familiar with the UK company. Verizon Communications, the US telecommunications group that owns 55 per cent of Verizon Wireless, has blocked the mobile operator from making dividend payments since 2005, so that the business can pay down debt. Vodafone owns the other 45 per cent of Verizon Wireless and has been trying, so far without success, to restore the dividends. Verizon Wireless generates about 30 per cent of the UK group's earnings but contributes no cash. The lack of dividends is one reason for tension between Verizon Communications and Vodafone. Another is Verizon Communications' wish to secure full ownership of Verizon Wireless, which is the largest mobile phone operator in the US.
benton.org/node/33865 | Financial Times | GigaOM
Recommend this Headline
back to top


JUSTICE APPROVES CISCO-TANDBERG
[SOURCE: Department of Justice, AUTHOR: Press release]
The Department of Justice announced March 29 that it will not challenge Cisco Systems Inc.'s acquisition of Tandberg ASA. The department has concluded that the proposed deal is not likely to be anticompetitive due to the evolving nature of the videoconferencing market and the commitments that Cisco has made to the European Commission (EC) to facilitate interoperability. During the course of its investigation the Department of Justice cooperated closely with the EC in its parallel review of the transaction, aided by waivers from the parties and industry participants. This permitted the agencies to share information and assessments of likely competitive effects and potential remedies. The Department of Justice's Antitrust Division analyzed the effect of combining the videoconferencing businesses of Cisco and Tandberg, focusing on a type of videoconferencing known as "telepresence," in which Cisco and Tandberg are competitors. Telepresence is a form of high-definition videoconferencing that provides an immersive experience to users, simulating face-to-face meetings. The department conducted an extensive investigation of this dynamic marketplace, including numerous interviews of industry participants and customers, and review of documents provided by the parties and other firms in the videoconferencing business. The EC also announced that it has cleared the transaction. Cisco has made commitments to facilitate interoperability between its telepresence products and those of other companies as part of the EC's merger clearance process. The commitments are designed to foster the development of open operating standards. The department views those commitments as a positive development that likely will enhance competition among producers of telepresence systems. Open standards lower barriers to entry, and can be especially procompetitive in rapidly evolving high technology markets. The department has taken the commitments into account, along with various market factors, such as the evolving nature of the telepresence business, in reaching its decision to close its investigation.
benton.org/node/33856 | Department of Justice
Recommend this Headline
back to top

TELEVISION

SATELLITE BILL PASSED AND SIGNED
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Senate March 25 passed a stand-alone version of the STELA, the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act, that changes what has been a five-year renewal of the satellite license to 10 years. President Barack Obama signed the bill into law March 26. The bill reauthorizes the license that allows satellite subscribers who cannot get a viewable signal from their in-market affiliate to get an out-of-market version. It also will get local signals to the remaining 28 or so smaller markets where it has been uneconomical to deliver them. The change to a 10-year window was said to be so that the bill would "score" in terms of being revenue-neutral, which it is not at five years, due to the way copyright fees are collected and disbursed over the smaller window versus the longer span. Apparently, due to an accounting issue, the bill at five years would see the government paying out more than it would collect. That would need to be offset somewhere else, due to the new pay as you go rule that any legislation that has a negative fund outlay has to include such measures.
benton.org/node/33852 | Multichannel News | CBO | White House
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FAMILY HOUR VIEWING
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Mary McNamara]
For a while there, it looked like family television was dead. In answer to the hard-R rating of cable, both network dramas and comedies became increasingly dark, grisly and/or sexually oriented, while the family comedy, once the keystone of prime time, dwindled to "The Simpsons" and a couple of live-action shows, one of which was "Two and a Half Men." But this past fall, with very little fanfare, television got back on message. Between the recent renaissance of the family comedy and the increasing popularity of kinder, gentler crime-solving shows, the long-lost family hour has quietly reconstructed itself. After years of being dominated by shows about graphic police work, medical procedurals and the sexual antics of friends and colleagues, the television landscape is once again dotted by homesteads, ringing with the sound of multigenerational and mostly non-profane voices.
benton.org/node/33866 | Los Angeles Times
Recommend this Headline
back to top


NEW CAMPAIGN FINANCE RULING
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Federal Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit handed down a ruling March 26 that could mean even more political ad money flowing into the Midterm election cycle. Saying that the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United had resolved the appeal, the court unanimously ruled in SpeechNow.org vs. the FEC that the campaign finance law contribution limits by individuals to SpeechNow, a 527 group advocating the election of federal candidates, are unconstitutional. Just as in Citizens United, the D.C. court held that while the contribution limits (or expenditure limits in the case of Citizens United) were unconstitutional, reporting and organizational requirements for the group were not. "The public has an interest in knowing who is speaking about a candidate and who is funding that speech," said the court, which also upheld the requirement that the group register as a political committee.
benton.org/node/33854 | Broadcasting&Cable
Recommend this Headline
back to top

ED TECH

THE DIGITAL CLASSROOM
[SOURCE: National Public Radio, AUTHOR: Joshua Brockman]
The sound of chalk on a blackboard is something you rarely hear on many campuses these days. That's because more and more professors use technology to distribute course materials, issue grades and enhance communication with students. For centuries, teachers have lectured to students and taught by writing things down. But software used by many schools, colleges and universities is making the dialogue between teachers and students more wired than ever. Philip Wirtz, a professor of decision sciences and psychology at The George Washington University (GWU), presents some complicated material during his statistical modeling and analysis class. To help students follow along, he uses a software program called Blackboard to share slides, which students download before class. "It's really just sort of a mechanism for coordinating what would otherwise be paper in the course," Wirtz says. But it's not just about saving trees. "It's a one-stop shop where students can come and get absolutely any access to me, any access to the teaching assistants," Wirtz adds.
benton.org/node/33857 | National Public Radio
Recommend this Headline
back to top

STORIES FROM ABROAD

OFCOM TO ACT ON BROADBAND SPEEDS
[SOURCE: BBC News, AUTHOR: ]
Net firms must do a better job of telling customers about broadband speeds or face stiffer regulation, Ofcom has warned. The warning came out of research the telecoms watchdog carried out on how ISPs sell broadband. It revealed that 74% of customers were not told that the maximum speed on their line was likely to be higher than the speed they would actually get. Ofcom wants to make improvements to how broadband is sold later this year.
This headline is presented in partnership with:

benton.org/node/33848 | BBC News
Recommend this Headline
back to top


CONSUMER PANEL: UK'S UNIVERSAL BROADBAND COMMITMENT MUST MEET CONSUMER NEEDS
[SOURCE: M2M Online Community, AUTHOR: Press release]
The UK's Communications Consumer Panel has stressed that the Government commitment to universal broadband, which was renewed in this week's budget, must be implemented in a way that meets consumers' needs. The Communications Consumer Panel has today published a set of principles to guide the implementation of the universal broadband commitment. These principles will help deliver the commitment so that it meets the needs of consumers in all parts of the UK. Consumer Principles for Universal Service Commitment implementation
1. The Universal Service Commitment should enable consumers to carry out the online activities that they consider to be essential or will soon.
2. The Government should define the Commitment in a way that ensures quality and reliability of service.
3. The Government should help consumers to do what they can themselves to optimize their broadband connections.
4. The Universal Service Commitment should benefit people in all parts of the UK, using different types of broadband connection where necessary.
5. The Government should be proactive in identifying the parts of the UK that would benefit from the Commitment.
6. Consumers who benefit from the Commitment should have a choice of service providers.
7. The Government should ensure that the Commitment keeps pace with consumer demands over the years ahead.
8. The Government should deliver the Commitment using next-generation broadband where practicable.
This headline is presented in partnership with:

benton.org/node/33847 | M2M Online Community
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FRENCH PIRATES 'DODGE' TOUCH LAWS
[SOURCE: BBC News, AUTHOR: ]
Some forms of piracy are on the rise in France despite the passing of a tough anti-piracy law, suggests a study. In late 2009, France adopted a "three-strikes law" which means persistent pirates can be thrown offline. A small-scale study shows that some French people are changing their habits and getting pirated music and movies from sources not covered by the law. Overall, found the study, illegal behavior has increased by 3% since the law was passed. The anti-piracy legislation was passed in October 2009 and means that those suspected of sharing pirated material online, such as movies and music, will be warned to stop or face action. Persistent pirates who ignore the warnings will be cut off for up to a year if a panel of judges backs a call for disconnection. Alternatively, pirates can be fined or given a prison sentence.
This headline is presented in partnership with:

benton.org/node/33846 | BBC News
Recommend this Headline
back to top


NATIONAL PLAN IS NEEDED FOR EMERGING DIGITAL ECONOMY
[SOURCE: Australian IT, AUTHOR: Anthony Wong]
[Commentary] In a democratic society like Australia, government elections provide an opportunity not only for the community to select its future political leaders, but also for the major issues of the day to be discussed and debated at length as politicians promote their agendas for the campaign. At a public forum held by the ACS in Hobart in the lead-up to the Tasmania poll the leaders of all three parliamentary parties acknowledged the importance of information and communications technology and affirmed their commitment to advancing the ICT sector. Labor Party leader David Bartlett used the event to announce a $4.85 million package of measures aimed at taking advantage of the NBN, including a major Smart Grid trial, a Connected Classrooms project and a Digital Futures Development Fund, among others. Mr. Bartlett, opposition leader Will Hodgeman, and Greens leader Nick McKim recognized the need for an integrated, whole-of-government approach to ICT planning and delivery, with the Labor Party promising to create a ministry for innovation, science and information technology if it was returned to power.
This headline is presented in partnership with:

benton.org/node/33845 | Australian IT
Recommend this Headline
back to top

Can You Hear Me Now? Why Your Cell Phone is So Terrible

Slate and the New America Foundation
Friday, April 2, 2010
10:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
http://www.newamerica.net/events/2010/can_you_hear_me_now

Few things in modern life irritate us as much as our cell phones. Calls drop, but contracts stick around forever. Monthly fees get ever higher, even as reception seems to get poorer.

The New America Foundation and Slate Magazine invite you to a panel discussion to figure out what we can do about this. How can the market be changed so that there's more competition and better service? What can the federal government do about bandwidth? What should be in a consumers Cell Phone Bill of Rights? And, well: how do we just get these darn things to work better?

Panelists

Farhad Manjoo
Technology Columnist
Slate Magazine

Sascha Meinrath
Director, Open Technology Initiative
New America Foundation

Tim Wu
Professor, Columbia Law School
Chairman, Free Press
Fellow, New America Foundation
Contributing Editor, Slate Magazine

Moderator
Nicholas Thompson
Senior Fellow, New America Foundation
Senior Editor, Wired Magazine



Headlines will return Monday, April 5

Headlines is off to Spring Break; we will return MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2010. See ya in Sarasota.

March 26, 2010 (Hearing Recap: Oversight of the National Broadband Plan)

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2010

Headlines is off to Spring Break; we will return MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2010. See ya in Sarasota.

Not much on the calendar next week -- see http://benton.org/calendar/2010-03-28--P1W


NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN
   Hearing Recap: Oversight of the National Broadband Plan
   National broadband plan cost $20 million
   Cheat Sheet: Sticking Points In Broadband Plan
   The National Broadband Plan: Unanswered Questions and Next Steps
   The National Broadband Plan: Where do we go from here?
   FCC broadband plan threatens 'golden age of broadcasting,' Goodmon says
   Electric Industry Raises Concerns about National Broadband Plan
   Media Access Project CEO Brown asks FCC about price competition
   Pew director Raine asks FCC about citizens in broadband plan
   UK regulators officially mock US over ISP "competition"
   Australian Government Says Can Build Broadband Network Without Telstra
   AT&T joins Verizon in calling for overhaul of telecom laws
   US falls to fifth in IT rankings
   Spectrum crisis, maybe; spectrum reform, absolutely

THE STIMULUS
   10 More BTOP Grants
   ACA Criticizes Some Broadband Stimulus Fund Distribution
   Qwest seeks broadband stimulus grant

NETWORK NEUTRALITY
   Who Will Defend the Rights of People of Color to an Open Internet? We Speak for Ourselves.

INNOVATION
   Supporting Innovation and Ensuring Global Competitiveness

JOURNALISM
   Corporation for Public Broadcasting Launches New Local Journalism Initiative
   2009 Was Worst Year for the Newspaper Business in Decades
   Len Downie: For-profit news orgs won't create enough journalism
   Health Care Opponents Dominate the Blogosphere
   Murdoch to launch UK web paywall in June

WIRELESS
   Wireless survey: 91% of Americans use cell phones
   Smartphone users want better access to data
   Carriers to be queried on 'SIM lock'-free mobile phones in Japan
   Cellphone providers look for opportunities in wireless Net

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
   How China's Internet generation broke the silence
   Google adds Twitter feed in China, again defying that country's rules
   What Happens as Google Uncensors Search in China?
   Rep Smith Blasts Microsoft
   Venezuela TV Exec Arrested For Criticizing Chavez
   Partner Defections, Ongoing Censorship Complicate Google's Plan to Keep Some Business in China
   Google, Baidu Search Results Differ By 85%, Baigoogledu Says
   With Google censorship, China is tough -- on the outside
   Google out of China: Doing no evil

OPEN GOVERNMENT
   Senator chides White House for ignoring existing transparency laws
   House kicks off caucus to push for open government laws
   House Passes File Sharing Bill
   CIO survey reveals cautious embrace of emerging trends
   Commercialization of University Research Request for Information

MORE ONLINE
Telework and benefits bills take one step forward | After victory, conservatives mount new challenges to campaign finance limits | Facebook helps movements ignite

back to top

NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN

HEARING RECAP: OVERSIGHT OF THE NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN
[SOURCE: House of Representatives Commerce Committee]
The House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet held an oversight hearing exploring the details of the Federal Communications Commission's recently released National Broadband Plan. Broadcasting & Cable reports that the hearing turned into a sparring match over the potential for the FCC to reclassify Internet access service as a Title II telecommunications subject to mandatory access provisions, at least in the early rounds as legislators traded opening statements. House Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman signaled he supported that move if it was necessary for the FCC to implement the plan and protect consumers. Free Press was quick to support Chairman Waxman's statement. Free Press Policy Director Ben Scott said, "We commend Chairman Waxman, he is absolutely correct. The FCC must put the needs of consumers first and ignore the 'sky is falling' claims of big ISPs like Verizon that are working to undermine the FCC's authority to promote competition and protect consumers. Just because big corporate interests don't like existing laws doesn't mean that the FCC has no power to enforce them. We are at a pivotal moment in charting our nation's digital future and repairing our international standing in broadband. The FCC must move forward to achieve its goal of universal affordable Internet access." The issue divided the subcommittee generally along political lines, with Republicans taking aim at the potential for reclassifying Internet access service from the more lightly-regulated Title I regime for information services. [much more at the URL below]
benton.org/node/33757 | House of Representatives Commerce Committee | Democratic Committee Staff | Chairman Waxman | Rep Barton | Broadcasting & Cable | CongressDaily | Reuters | B&C - Genachowski | CongressDaily | Multichannel News | MediaWeek | Chairman Genachowski | Commissioner Copps | Commissioner McDowell | Commissioner Clyburn | Commissioner Baker | Free Press
Recommend this Headline
back to top


NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN COST $20 MILLION
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Cecilia Kang]
The Federal Communications Commission spent $20 million on the year-long process of creating the national broadband plan. Rep Cliff Stearns (R-FL) revealed that price tag in a House hearing Thursday. The FCC told him in a letter that they spent $600,000 on printing and production, $4 million on 78 temporary full-time and part-time employees, and $340,000 on workshops and travel. But the agency also explained that large chunks of those expenses will "go on to live beyond the plan." It spent $8 million for a database and software that the FCC will continue to use to implement the broadband plan. And $2.4 million went to the salaries of employees who worked on the plan. "The investment in the IT infrastructure, software and the significant amount of data will prove invaluable to the commission on an ongoing basis," said Colin Crowell, a senior adviser to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. He said that because the data and information technology capabilities of the agency were so poor, the FCC purchased data sets "to get the best information at hand." The FCC's Republican commissioners said they felt they were well informed by the agency's broadband team of its work. The FCC paid for the creation of the national broadband plan through $13.28 million in stimulus funds and $7.34 million out of the FCC's regular budget. The agency's annual budget is $350 million.
benton.org/node/33792 | Washington Post | Genachowski letter to Stearns | Stearns letter to Genachowski | The Hill
Recommend this Headline
back to top


STICKING POINTS IN BROADBAND PLAN
[SOURCE: National Journal, AUTHOR: Sara Jerome]
Every American should have broadband access -- that's an idea every faction in the telecom world seems to endorse. Making it so is another thing altogether. While not everyone has shown their cards yet, major telecom players are sure to air grievances soon over Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski's decade-long plan to get more Americans online. In fact, with its aims to spark action from Congress and in the agencies, including heavy lifting at the FCC, the blueprint may also inadvertently pay many telecom lobbyists' salaries over the next few years in a sector that already spends exorbitantly on sway. Here's a brief overview of a few parts of the plan that will provide fertile ground for disagreement as stakeholders speak up.
benton.org/node/33791 | National Journal
Recommend this Headline
back to top


UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AND NEXT STEPS
[SOURCE: Free Press | New America Foundation, AUTHOR: ]
While the National Broadband Plan takes several critical first steps toward solving the nation's broadband deficiencies, the Federal Communications Commission must act decisively and quickly in several key areas in order to reach its goals. The FCC should take immediate action on: 1) Competition. 2) Universal Service Reform. 3) Adoption rates. 4) Spectrum. 5) Transparency. 6) Data. 7) Jurisdiction. [more at the URL below]
benton.org/node/33790 | Free Press | New America Foundation
Recommend this Headline
back to top


WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
[SOURCE: Fierce, AUTHOR: Bruce Mehlman]
[Commentary] The Internet Innovation Alliance believes the plan could have a positive and powerful impact, provided it is not accompanied by heavy new regulations that depress investment. But much work remains to be done, with many details to be ironed out. It certainly raises several questions to be answered as we go forward:
Who's Driving Now? Omnibus or Piecemeal Legislation? Budget Neutral or Free to Spend? Restructure Markets or Maximize Investment? Whence Universal Service Funding? Are the Targets (100 squared) Aspirational or Mandatory? How Deep A Dive into Privacy? [more at the URL below]
benton.org/node/33789 | Fierce
Recommend this Headline
back to top


BROADBAND PLAN THREATENS 'GOLDEN AGE OF BROADCASTING'
[SOURCE: Broadcast Engineering, AUTHOR: Phil Kurz]
The National Broadband Plan raises a serious, unanswered question in the mind of Jim Goodmon, president and CEO of Capitol Broadcasting: Why target the broadcast industry for spectrum? The plan, presented to Congress March 16, calls for recouping 120MHz of spectrum currently used for DTV transmission, which can be auctioned and repurposed to support projected future demand for wireless broadband Internet service. Doing so will prevent broadcasters, who have toiled through a lengthy digital television transition, from fulfilling their highest potential, he said. "I think we are right now at our best," Goodmon said. "We've never before been able to do so much, and I have no idea why [the FCC] have abandoned us. Of all the spectrum out there, you want to pick the spectrum that provides free local news to people?" "I would say that the FCC — the chairman [Julius Genachowski] and his advisors — no longer support the idea of free over-the-air television," Goodmon said. "They can obviously expand broadband and take care of their whole broadband plan and never touch broadcast spectrum."
benton.org/node/33793 | Broadcast Engineering
Recommend this Headline
back to top


ELECTRIC INDUSTRY AND BROADBAND PLAN
[SOURCE: Coalition of Concerned Utilities, AUTHOR: Jack Richards, Thomas Magee]
Eight electric utilities have taken their concerns about pole attachments to the Federal Communications Commission. While supportive of the deployment of broadband nationwide, the electric utility industry is concerned about recommendations in the National Broadband Plan. The industry says it is subject to unfair and discriminatory pole attachment rates, unauthorized attachments, safety violations and administrative burdens. These concerns, the commenters say, are absent in the broadband plan.
benton.org/node/33788 | Coalition of Concerned Utilities
Recommend this Headline
back to top


OFCOM MOCKS US
[SOURCE: ars technica, AUTHOR: Nate Anderson]
Here's how US regulators do a broadband plan: talk about competition even while admitting there isn't enough, then tinker around the edges with running fiber to "anchor institutions" and start collecting real data on US broadband use. Here's how they do it in the UK: order incumbent telco British Telecom to share its fiber lines with any ISP who is willing to pay. In places where BT hasn't yet run fiber, order the company to share its ducts and poles with anyone who wants to run said fiber. In the 14 percent of the UK without meaningful broadband competition, slap price controls on Internet access to keep people from getting gouged. Government regulations can't encourage innovation? That's not the way UK telecoms regulator Ofcom sees the world, and it takes a none-too-subtle dig at the US model. "Availability of super-fast broadband in the UK (some 46 percent of homes) is now ahead of most large economies where deployments have been funded commercially. In the US, AT&T and Verizon have upgraded their networks to cover 17 percent and 12 percent of households, respectively, while cable company Comcast is approaching coverage of around 35 percent of US households with super-fast cable broadband." In case you're not getting the message, Ofcom is prepared to bludgeon you over the head with it. "Aside from small urban countries with highly concentrated populations, like Singapore, the main countries which are currently leading in the rollout and take-up of super-fast broadband are those which have had significant government intervention to support deployment, such as Japan and South Korea."
benton.org/node/33785 | Ars Technica
Recommend this Headline
back to top


AUSTRALIA DOESN'T NEED TELSTRA
[SOURCE: Dow Jones, AUTHOR: Cynthia Koons]
Australia's communications minister, Stephen Conroy, said March 24 that negotiations are continuing between government-owned National Broadband Network Company and Telstra on how the two can work together on a planned national broadband network but NBN Co. can "absolutely" build the network without Telstra. The minister's stance indicates the tensions between the government and the formerly state-owned telecommunications giant are still riding high. While he has threatened to forge ahead without Telstra's cooperation in the past, many analysts still view the company as best-placed to build the network given its vast existing infrastructure. Conroy would not comment on what Telstra last week called a "significant gap" between the parties' financial expectations about the worth of the company's assets that could be sold into the network. He declined to say what the size of the gap is, but confidential documents accidentally leaked by the government last October valued Telstra's telecommunications-network assets at anywhere between A$8 billion and A$40 billion, illustrating how difficult it is to put a price tag on the assets.
benton.org/node/33784 | Dow Jones
Recommend this Headline
back to top


AT&T WANTS TELECOM OVERHAUL
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Kim Hart]
Jim Cicconi, AT&T's top lobbyist, said that Congress should decide who has authority over broadband services and that lawmakers should step in before the Federal Communications Commission tries to reclassify broadband. "If there are questions about the authority of the FCC in the Internet ecosystem, the proper answer is not for the FCC to get adventurous in interpreting its authority, as some are urging. Instead, any question of the FCC's jurisdiction over the Internet should properly be referred to the Congress for resolution." Cicconi wrote, "The FCC derives its authority from Congress, and if the courts say the FCC lacks the authority it needs to do what it wants to do, the proper--and constitutionally correct--answer is to ask the Congress to address the question."
benton.org/node/33783 | Hill, The | AT&T-Jim Cicconi | dslreports.com
Recommend this Headline
back to top


US FALLS TO FIFTH IN IT RANKINGS
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Tony Romm]
The United States fell from third to fifth in the World Economic Forum's 2009-2010 information technology rankings. It currently trails Sweden, Singapore, Denmark and Switzerland in the group's annual comparison of states' IT venture capital, technology rules and standards and broadband availability, among other factors. Math and science education are lagging, while government services have yet to adopt the most current and effective information technology practices.
This headline is presented in partnership with:

benton.org/node/33782 | Hill, The | World Economic Forum | Bloomberg | Voice of America
Recommend this Headline
back to top


SPECTRUM CRISIS, MAYBE; SPECTRUM REFORM, ABSOLUTELY
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Sen Olympia Snowe (R-Maine)]
[Commentary] In proposed legislation and oversight of the Federal Communications Commission, I have made spectrum policy reform a priority. I intend to introduce comprehensive spectrum reform legislation in the coming weeks to modernize policy and fix fundamental deficiencies in our nation's radio spectrum management and coordination activities. Taking this corrective action will allow us to meet the future telecommunications needs of all spectrum users. For consumers, these fixes will lead to additional choices, greater innovation, lower prices and more reliable services. Specifically, this legislation will task the FCC and National Telecommunications and Information Administration to perform much-needed spectrum measurements to determine actual usage and occupancy rates. This data is fundamental to determining utilization metrics for different wireless services so that policymakers and the public can make informed decisions about future spectrum uses. Also required is a cost-benefit analysis of spectrum relocation opportunities to move certain incumbent users and services to more efficient spectrum bands. Many legacy wireless services could employ newer technologies to provide more efficient use of spectrum. [more at the URL below]
benton.org/node/33781 | Hill, The
Recommend this Headline
back to top

THE STIMULUS

10 MORE BTOP GRANTS
[SOURCE: National Telecommunications and Information Administration]
Commerce Secretary Gary Locke today announced 10 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act investments to help bridge the technological divide, boost economic growth, create jobs, and improve education and healthcare across the country. The investments, totaling more than $63 million in grants, will increase broadband access and adoption in more than a dozen states. The grants will fund projects that lay the groundwork to bring enhanced high-speed Internet access to thousands of households and businesses and link hundreds of schools, hospitals, libraries, and public safety offices to the information superhighway. [read more about the grantees at the URL below]
benton.org/node/33780 | National Telecommunications and Information Administration
Recommend this Headline
back to top


ACA CRITICIZES RUS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The American Cable Association says that the Rural Utilities Service has been handing out broadband stimulus money to fund service in competition with its members -- small and medium-sized cable/telecom companies. In a letter to RUS administrator and former FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein, ACA President Matthew Polka said ACA was "disappointed" to learn that some of the grant and loan money was going to areas "already sufficiently served with broadband." Polka said that the award process does not allow for operators to review the applications to ensure their accuracy. Polka wants RUS to adopt a formal review process that allows aggrieved parties to submit additional evidence, and in the meantime review all the round one applications (round two bids were due March 15) to make sure that no funding will be used to overbuild existing service.
benton.org/node/33779 | Broadcasting&Cable
Recommend this Headline
back to top


QWEST SEEKS STIMULUS GRANT
[SOURCE: Connected Planet, AUTHOR: Joan Engebretson]
After dropping hints several weeks ago that it might apply for broadband stimulus funds in the second funding round, Qwest Communications today confirmed that it will seek a $350 million grant from the Broadband Initiatives Program administered by the Rural Utilities Service. As a requirement of that program, Qwest also said it would provide $117 million toward the cost of its proposed project, which would bring broadband at speeds of 12 to 40 Mbps to rural areas throughout its 14-state region.
benton.org/node/33778 | Connected Planet
Recommend this Headline
back to top

NETWORK NEUTRALITY

NETWORK NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: The Huffington Post, AUTHOR: Malkia Cyril]
[Commentary] In every competition, there's a winner and a loser. The open Internet protections being debated by the Federal Communications Commission right now will determine who wins and who loses in the fight over whether big companies or regular people will control the Internet. I want everyday people to win. It makes sense that the threat of digital redlining has some civil rights groups in the DC beltway concerned. This concern has resulted in some groups like the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council (MMTC), run by David Honig, taking a position against the open Internet protections that would ensure that the Internet remains an un-gated platform for self-representation, innovation, and opportunity. What doesn't make sense is that groups like MMTC would deny that the financial relationship between them and the same media companies that are blackmailing the communities MMTC claims to represent, has an impact on their position on open Internet protections. I agree with Garlin Gilchrest II of the Center for Community Change that the undue pressure of big media on some civil rights groups like MMTC to advocate against strong open Internet protections has pushed those organizations dangerously close to unwittingly and unwillingly becoming astroturf groups. I don't understand why a group claiming to represent the interests of people of color like me would focus on us only as consumers of a commercial broadband and not as communities who deserve all the richness an open Internet has to offer. If MMTC won't stand for the millions of people of color and poor people outside of the DC beltway, who will? Perhaps its simply time for us to speak for ourselves, and demand the strongest open Internet protections possible. Who speaks for communities of color and the poor about open Internet protections? We speak for ourselves.
benton.org/node/33777 | Huffington Post, The
Recommend this Headline
back to top

INNOVATION

SUPPORTING INNOVATION
[SOURCE: House Science and Technology Committee]
On March 24, the House Committee on Science and Technology's Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation held a hearing to broadly examine factors and policies that foster innovation. "The importance of innovation—creating new ideas, products, and services—cannot be overstated. And in this global, highly competitive economy, it is increasingly the intangible inputs of R&D, education, and entrepreneurial risk-taking that drive that growth," said Chairman David Wu (D-OR). "Innovation is key to creating new industries, and therefore key to the creation of American jobs." In the twentieth century, innovations have moved away from physical-capital intensive technology advancements of the past, like railroads, to more research-intensive advancements, like DNA sequencing, which depend more on factors like R&D and an educated workforce. Economists agree that innovation has a significant, positive impact on the nation's economy; more than half of the growth of the GDP since World War II is attributable to the development and adoption of new technologies. Members and witnesses discussed the role of the federal government in supporting innovation in the 21st century, including fostering collaborations between federal agencies and the private sector, bolstering science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education to ensure a trained workforce, and supporting basic research. Members and witnesses also discussed the appropriate role of the federal government in supporting commercialization and entrepreneurs and state innovation-based economic discovery.
benton.org/node/33776 | House Science and Technology Committee
Recommend this Headline
back to top

JOURNALISM

CPB NEWS INITIATIVE
[SOURCE: Corporation for Public Broadcasting]
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) announced funding for a major journalism initiative that will increase original local reporting capacity in seven regions around the country, and a planning project to develop an open information architecture to harness the collective power of the public media network. CPB is funding the creation of seven Local Journalism Centers (LJCs), combining CPB and participating stations' resources for a ground-breaking new approach to newsgathering and its distribution. The Centers will form teams of multimedia journalists, who will focus on issues of particular relevance to each region; their in-depth reports will be presented regionally and nationally via digital platforms, community engagement programs and radio and television broadcasts. The LJC initiative builds on CPB's long-standing commitment to journalism and its ongoing funding of public media news and public affairs content and initiatives, including Project Argo, a pilot effort funded jointly with the Knight Foundation to enable a dozen NPR and PBS stations to expand their reporting and increase their expertise on topics of local relevance. In addition, CPB also announced funding for the Public Media Platform, a project administered by NPR, in partnership with PBS, APM, PRI and PRX. This coalition of public media leaders will develop a prototype for a flexible common platform to support public media innovation and collaboration. The ultimate goal is to collect, distribute, present and monetize digital media content efficiently, allowing producers and stations to devote their resources to reporting, content production and community engagement. [more at the URL below]
benton.org/node/33775 | Corporation for Public Broadcasting | NYTimes | Reuters
Recommend this Headline
back to top

WIRELESS

91% IN US USE CELL PHONES
[SOURCE: ars technica, AUTHOR: Chris Foresman]
Even in the face of the largest economic recession since the Great Depression, the wireless industry continues to grow as a vast majority of the US population is using a mobile phone. Over 285 million Americans are mobile subscribers, about 91 percent of the total population. That's up 15 million over the same time last year, and growth has slowed somewhat due to market saturation. Those 285 million callers used 1.12 trillion minutes of talk time in the last half of 2009, up 3.4 percent of the same period in 2008. That breaks down to an average of 6.1 billion minutes used per day, or about 21 minutes per person per day. Wireless service revenues totaled $77 billion for the last half of the year, up slightly from last year. But the real growth is coming from wireless data services -- mobile Web, text messages, and other non-voice services. In the latter half of last year, revenue for wireless data service totaled over $22 billion, nearly a third of overall wireless services revenue and up 26 percent year-over-year. 257 million "data-capable" devices are active on US carriers' networks. However, roughly 50 million of those are smartphones capable of more advanced wireless services than SMS, MMS, and WAP browsing. Another 12 million are 3G-enabled laptops. Those devices are responsible for the majority of data service revenues.
benton.org/node/33774 | Ars Technica
Recommend this Headline
back to top

Partner Defections, Ongoing Censorship Complicate Google's Plan to Keep Some Business in China

Google's plan to keep some of its China business while avoiding censorship is looking increasingly complicated as more Chinese partners turn away from the U.S. Internet giant and it becomes apparent that some remaining operations will continue to be censored.

Analysts estimate that Google gets 1% to 2% of its global revenue from China, or roughly $250 million to $500 million last year. Edward Yu, chief executive of Analysys International, a Beijing-based research firm, estimates that 30% to 40% of Google's Internet-search revenue in China comes from sales of ads placed on Google's sites outside the country, such as Google.com. That revenue isn't likely to diminish dramatically, analysts say. Google will remain an attractive ad platform for Chinese companies that use it to reach a global audience, like Alibaba.com Ltd., an online-trading platform that is one of China's most prominent Internet companies and that advertises on Google.com. How much of the remaining two-thirds or so of Google's China revenue is sustainable is less clear. Google's operations in China include video-search, music and map services, and a mobile Web site—some of these run in partnership with Chinese companies. Google has obligations to fulfill its contracts with those companies, which must remain in compliance with censorship rules, even if Google isn't.

Google, Baidu Search Results Differ By 85%, Baigoogledu Says

Google Inc.'s search engine yields different results from Baidu Inc.'s Web site 85 percent of the time, according to a Chinese Internet site dedicated to comparing the two services. The difference between both services highlights the type of Internet search results viewable in China, the world's biggest Internet market by users, which is subject to a government monitoring system known as the "Great Firewall."

With Google censorship, China is tough -- on the outside

The Communist Party has long wrestled with how to weigh the competing dictates of economic openness and social control; how to attract international businesses without bringing in too many foreigners and their alien ideas; how to let people enjoy the educational opportunities of the outside world without undermining the party's ideological hold.

When there's been a clash of those interests, Beijing almost always has come down on the side of control. In that context, its unwillingness to bend to Google Inc.'s demands for less censorship of the Internet was a foregone conclusion. "The Chinese are very mindful of the potential political repercussions of openness -- they make no bones about it -- and around the margins, their desire to maintain social stability will trump any other issue," said Kenneth Lieberthal, senior China analyst at the Brookings Institution.

Google out of China: Doing no evil

[Commentary] Google cofounder Sergey Brin spent the early years of his childhood in the Soviet Union. His family felt firsthand what it was like to live under a totalitarian government. They didn't like it, and managed to escape to the United States while he was still a young boy. For all the talk about the business wisdom of Google's move to pull out of China, it may have finally rested on the Brin family's experiences under an oppressive political system. More than just a business decision, it was the right thing to do. China's ongoing censorship of access to the Internet has begun to embolden other countries to take similar steps, Mr. Brin said this week. The level of discomfort at Google in cooperating with Chinese censorship finally became too high, he said. Now, this step by giant Google might cause other censoring countries to think twice. In the long run, Google may profit from its stand. It's already boosted its image by more closely living up to its motto of "Don't be evil." And it still can hope to return someday to a more open China.

After victory, conservatives mount new challenges to campaign finance limits

For decades, James Bopp Jr, the vice chairman of the Republican National Committee, has fought restrictions on political spending, seeing them as an affront to free speech, and he was the force behind a recent Supreme Court ruling freeing corporations and unions to spend as much as they want on political ads. Far from resting on his laurels, Bopp has expanded his staff of lawyers and spent the eight weeks following the high-profile decision arguing to judges across the country that various other regulations governing local and federal elections are unconstitutional.

His team is also keeping a close eye on efforts by states, Congress and shareholder groups to counter the Supreme Court decision, criticized by President Obama as a move that would "open the floodgates for special interests." "Citizens United is going to have a very substantial impact," said Bopp, referring to the case decided by the nation's high court. "Obviously, we're encouraged that we're on the road back to restoring the First Amendment application to campaign finance."