Can America Afford FCC Chairman Genachowski?
[Commentary] Two years after he was nominated to chair the Federal Communications Commission, what does Julius Genachowski have to show for his efforts? Very little.
My problem with this FCC is not policy but its inaction and the uncertainty it engenders. The FCC has held dozens of public hearings. It passed a few decisions, often on issues that were extensions of Clinton/Gore or Bush era FCCs. It issued a report on broadband. It spent a lot of its time on the non-discriminatory use of the Internet infrastructure (“net neutrality”), which is important in the long run but secondary to the creation of a nationwide infrastructure in a recession. And in any event, after much spinning of wheels, it got nowhere on this issue.
Is Chairman Genachowski to blame? Yes and no. The problem today is that regulatory delay is costlier than ever. Not only is the information environment much larger than in the past, it is also much faster-moving, and more central to the national economy. The cause of this is technological change, which progresses at the sizzling rate of “Moore’s law”, while the policy process barely moves at all. If anything, the FCC has become, in recent years, more politicized and dysfunctional. And this is what is happening. While it polishes its elaborate proceedings, the economy is stagnating and the information sector, the growth engine in the 1990s, is on hold. The FCC is becoming the anti-stimulus agency.
What, then, should Julius Genachowski do in the next two years? The answers are short and simple:
- In terms of procedure: Set policies and dates. There are a lot of good policy proposals out there and even more worthy opinions, but now, after two years of immersion, it is high time to pick a few, clear priorities, avoid distractions, and make decisions tirelessly under ambitious deadlines.
- In terms of substance: focus on nationwide broadband infrastructure. One of the FCC’s few accomplishments, prodded by Congress, was a national broadband plan. But this excellent plan has been crawling along in its implementation. The FCC claims that it is pushing sixty proceedings to do so, but if one looks more closely, many of them are clean-up operations the agency was doing anyway. Missing in the bureaucratic detail is the big picture of a national purpose, and a sense of urgency. It is doubtful that countries like Korea or Japan, which upgrade their networks aggressively, go about it in this way.