November 2011

There’s an opening for one of the most plum tech gigs in Washington — the head of Google’s D.C. shop — and the search giant’s decision on a successor to Alan Davidson could speak volumes about the company’s strategy to contend with mounting problems in the nation’s capital.

Speculation is already swirling over whom Google might hire to replace Davidson, who opened the company’s Washington operation six years ago as a one-man shop in shared rental space. Will the company tap a Republican as it seeks to shed its reputation as a liberal stalwart? A big-name former lawmaker or administration official with Mitch McConnell or Nancy Pelosi on speed dial? A tech policy wonk? Or, perhaps, all of the above? Google’s new D.C. chief will have on his or her plate the largest challenge to date for the Mountain View, Calif.-based search giant: a broad, ongoing federal antitrust probe at the Federal Trade Commission. The company is also confronting major policy challenges on the privacy and intellectual property fronts. Some tech industry officials said by hiring a team of political veterans, Davidson has already done much of the heavy lifting to make Google a force in Washington.

Allot Communications, a supplier of service optimization and revenue generation solutions for fixed and mobile broadband service providers, released its inaugural Allot MobileTrends Charging Report which shows that 35% of operators are already implementing Value-based Charging strategies such as Bill-shock prevention and Social Networking plans that make applications such as Facebook, MySpace & Twitter zero-rated. The MobileTrends Charging Report is based on publicly available data, collected during Q3, 2011 from over 100 mobile operators worldwide. Operators are moving away from All-you-can-eat data plans towards Volume-based models, aimed at curbing usage, deferring investments and increasing ARPU.

According to the Allot MobileTrends Charging Report:
• 35% of operators sampled are already offering Value-based Charging plans, such as zero-rated Facebook
• Only 13.5% of operators sampled are currently offering ‘true unlimited’ plans
• 26% of operators sampled already have revenue sharing deals and charging models in place
• 48% of operators sampled are currently curbing data overage
• 15% of operators sampled charge for tethering, mainly in North America and EMEA
• Cloud music providers, Spotify, Pandora and Rhapsody are driving the revenue sharing charge

On November 9, 2011, the Federal Communications Commission conducted a national test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) over television and radio. The Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies (Wireless RERC) is conducting a survey of people with visual and hearing impairment in order to understand the effectiveness and accessibility of EAS. Please take a few minutes to complete the post-EAS-test survey. If you need assistance completing the survey, please contact Salimah LaForce at 404-894-8297

The Department of Commerce's Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA) and National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) released a report, “Exploring the Digital Nation,” that analyzes broadband Internet adoption in the United States. Overall, approximately seven out of ten households in the United States subscribe to broadband service. The report finds a strong correlation between broadband adoption and socio-economic factors, such as income and education, but says these differences do not explain the entire broadband adoption gap that exists along racial, ethnic, and geographic lines. Even after accounting for socio-economic differences, certain minority and rural households still lag in broadband adoption.

The report analyzes data collected through an Internet Use supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS) of about 54,300 households conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau in October 2010. Earlier this year, NTIA released initial findings from the survey, showing that while virtually all demographic groups have increased adoption of broadband Internet at home since the prior year, historic disparities among demographic groups remain. Today’s report presents broadband adoption statistics after adjusting for various socio-economic differences.

The principal findings of the report are:

Overall

• Sixty-eight percent of American households used broadband Internet in 2010, up from 64 percent in 2009. Only three percent of households relied on dial-up access to the Internet in 2010, down from five percent in 2009. Another nine percent of households had people who accessed the Internet only outside of the home.
• All told, approximately 80 percent of American households had at least one Internet user, whether inside or outside the home and regardless of technology type used to access the Internet.
• Cable modems and DSL were the leading broadband technologies for home Internet adoption, with 32 percent and 23 percent of households, respectively, using these services.
• Differences in Household Broadband Adoption
• Households with lower incomes and less education, as well as Blacks, Hispanics, people with disabilities, and rural residents, were less likely to have Internet service at home.
• Eighty-one percent of Asian households and 72 percent of White households had broadband at home, compared to 57 percent of Hispanic households and 55 percent of Black households.
• Seventy percent of urban households had broadband at home, compared to 57 percent of rural households.
• Households with school-age children were more likely to have broadband at home (78 percent) than the national rate. Older householders, particularly those ages 65 and older (45 percent), were less likely to have broadband at home.
• Less than half (43 percent) of households with annual incomes below $25,000 had broadband access at home, while 93 percent of households with incomes exceeding $100,000 had broadband.
• Average broadband adoption in 2010 varied by state from about half (52 percent) of all households to 80 percent.

Role of Socio-Economic Factors

• Socio-economic differences do not explain the entire broadband adoption gap. For example, after accounting for socio-economic and geographic factors, Black and Hispanic households still lag White households in broadband adoption by 11 percentage points, though the gap between Asian and White households disappears.
• After accounting for socio-economic and demographic factors, rural households still lag urban households in broadband adoption by five percentage points.
• In contrast, differences in socio-economic characteristics do explain a substantial portion but not all of the broadband adoption lag among people with disabilities.
• Reasons for Not Subscribing to Broadband at Home
• The main reasons cited for not having Internet access at home were a lack of interest or need (47 percent), the expense (24 percent), and the lack of an adequate computer (15 percent).
• Not surprisingly, individuals without broadband service at home relied on locations such as public libraries (20 percent) or other people’s houses (12 percent) to go online.

Long-term Trends in Internet and Computer Use

• Between 2001 and 2010, broadband Internet use at home, regardless of technology type, rose from 9 percent to 68 percent of households.
• Between 1997 and 2010, Internet use among households, regardless of technology type, rose from 19 percent to 71 percent.
• More than three quarters (77 percent) of American households had a computer at home in 2010, up from 62 percent in 2003.