November 2011

Smaller Cable Firms Seeking Exemption From Loud TV Law

A group of smaller cable companies are asking the Federal Communications Commission for a one-year exemption from having to comply with a law enacted in December that would lower the volume on all those loud TV ads that irritate so many television viewers.

The law specifically requires that the volume of commercials should not exceed the decibel level of regular programming. Under the law known as the CALM Act, the FCC has one year to ensure that advertisers adopt industry technology that "modulates sound levels and prevents overly loud commercials." In a meeting with FCC officials, the American Cable Association argued that smaller cable firms need more time to absorb the costs of complying with the law.

LightSquared CEO walks thin line warning of 'spectrum crunch'

At the Open Mobile Summit, LightSquared CEO Sanjiv Ahuja tried to link his roiled-in-controversy would-be LTE wholesaler with all things positive: openness, technology democratization, innovation, economic development and more.

To paint LightSquared in the friendliest of terms, he even went so far as to color its network as a “dumb pipe,” out of step with industry worries concerning that phrase, but in line with efforts to make LightSquared as unthreatening as possible. According to Ahuja, the additional mobile broadband capacity LightSquared can provide – on a wholesale basis to all comers—can help relieve what he claimed what is not only a looming spectrum shortage, but a capacity shortfall as well.

How Yahoo’s IntoNow "Listens" And Revolutionizes The Way We Watch TV

When Yahoo bought IntoNow earlier this year (for a reported $20 million), some people wondered what Yahoo wanted with a TV "check-in" app. Now we know: The IntoNow team is releasing a fully featured "second screen" iPad app that listens for audio signatures from news, sports, or other TV programs as they're being broadcast, matches them up with a database, and then serves viewers supplementary content on their tablets. It's one of Yahoo’s most innovative offerings of late, and, as such, is the first substantive indicator that the company that has languished in the doldrums for the last few years might actually one day deliver on its promise to become "the premier digital media company."

Longmont Telecom Issue: 2A looks like it will pass

Light that fiber. Longmont's Ballot Question 2A cruised to victory, carrying about 60 percent of the vote for most of the night. The vote lifts state restrictions on the city's use of its 17-mile-long fiber-optic loop, allowing it to offer services to residents and businesses either directly or through a partner.

"I'm glad to see 2A won," said Mayor Bryan Baum, one of the most vocal advocates for the issue. "I think it shows that money isn't the determinator." "Goliath goes down hard and David wins the day!" cheered Vince Jordan, owner of RidgeviewTel and another 2A supporter. The anti-2A group Look Before We Leap spent close to $300,000 fighting the issue as of Oct. 23. According to city clerk records, the group's biggest contributor was the Colorado Cable Telecommunications Association, an industry group which had recorded $175,000 of contributions to Look Before We Leap in the same time frame. George Merritt, a spokesman for Look Before We Leap, said he felt the community had received a message to move carefully on developing municipal telecommunications.

The city built its 17-mile fiber-optic loop in 1997. The $1.1 million cost was paid for by the Platte River Power Authority. But about two-thirds of it has remained "dark" -- unused -- thanks to a 2005 state law that barred the city from providing retail access to the loop, either directly or through a private partner. As a result, the system's only been open to those able to lease fiber individually, including public agencies and a few large institutions such as Longmont United Hospital. Through much of the campaign, opponents accused the city of having no plan as it jumped into the "risky" telecommunications business.

Outspent 60:1, Longmont Kicks Comcast’s Assets

[Commentary] Comcast and its allies spent $300,000 to unleash every trick and tactic in the campaign playbook to try to kill a measure that gives Longmont, CO citizens and businesses the right to pick their own best broadband solutions. Measure 2A supporters spent $5,000, if that.

“Yea though we walk through the valley in the shadow of Comcast’s desire to annihilate our communities’ right to choose our best broadband solutions, we hold our fear in check and engage the foe because we believe it is possible for the underdog to win.” I made that up last night as I headed out to prep one of my soccer teams for our biggest game of the season. I was feeling pumped after receiving the news that Longmont, CO’s Measure 2A was on its way to victory. The underdog had stood tall in the face of a huge corporation’s relentless efforts to buy a local election rather than compete in the free market. However, despite being outspent 60 to 1, Measure 2A won with 60% of the vote. There are some valuable lessons for other communities to learn from Longmont’s duel with a corporate giant hell-bent on leveling all opposition in its path – and win. Some communities that have broadband dreams of their own, particularly those in Colorado, have watched the battle to gauge how things might turn out in their particular towns and counties. These elections are no walk in the park, but as we see, they are winnable.

Windstream Continues Small Scale Stimulus Pace

True to form, Windstream announced it has begun construction on a Florida network upgrade funded in part through a broadband stimulus grant awarded by the Rural Utilities Service -- and once again the announcement covers only a small part of stimulus projects the carrier has planned in the state.

Although Windstream won a total of $38.3 million for Florida, this week’s announcement only pertains to a project to deploy two miles or so of fiber optics and electronic equipment in the town of Mayo, which has a population of just over 1,000. The project will make Internet access at speeds of at least 6 Mb/s available to 60 customers. The announcement follows a pattern that Windstream has displayed in previous announcements of stimulus project starts -- recognizing only one small project in an individual state. The company took the same approach in announcing stimulus starts in Kentucky, Iowa, Georgia, and Mississippi. Windstream was the single biggest winner of broadband stimulus funding from the RUS -- winning a total of $181.3 million in funding for projects in 13 states. But the carrier has taken its time in breaking ground on these projects. Perhaps Windstream wants to make sure that it has appropriate procedures in place before beginning aggressive deployment -- or perhaps the company, like other stimulus winners, has seen delays as a result of a fiber shortage since the tsunami that hit Japan in March took Sumitomo, a key fiber supplier, offline.

Consumers Union Presses Wireless Companies on Bill Shock Plans

Consumers Union, the public policy and advocacy division of Consumer Reports, sent letters to wireless companies to urge them to disclose and implement their plans to fight consumer “bill shock” as soon as possible.

The letters come after the organization joined CTIA, the wireless industry trade association, and the FCC last month to announce the industry’s agreement to provide free alerts to help customers avoid “bill shock” – the unexpectedly large fees that pop up on your bill, often because you exceeded your usage limits. These alerts would be sent to consumers before they reach their limits on voice, text or data services, as well as free alerts to customers when they are about to incur international roaming charges. “We know that some carriers are already providing certain alerts, and we see this as proof that it’s possible for consumers to begin receiving these free alerts now, rather than a year from now,” said Parul P. Desai, policy counsel for Consumers Union. “Unfortunately, current alert policies vary widely across companies and often times aren’t even clearly disclosed by wireless providers. We are simply asking wireless companies to make clear what tools consumers have available to them now, and urging them to comply with this new policy sooner rather than later."

The letters sent to each company ask about their respective plans for complying with the new code of conduct, as well as additional details about how each alert will be implemented and when. Some letters ask for clarifications to existing policies. For example, CU’s letter to Verizon asks the company to explain its current policy for alerts, citing unclear information on its web site. It also cites a recent Consumer Reports story by an editor who did not receive any alerts from Verizon before exceeding his plan’s limits, despite the company’s statement that it “strives” to provide these alerts.

Will Cheap Computer Bridge India's Digital Divide?

India has unveiled what its government says is the world's cheapest tablet computer, along with a promise to make the device available to the country's college students, and possibly, to those in high school as well.

The government says it's a major step toward bridging the country's gigantic digital divide. The tablet is called "Aakash," the Hindi word for "sky," and boosters say it could give Internet access to billions of people. The Aakash was developed for the government by Datawind, a London-based company founded by two brothers from India's Punjab state. Datawind is selling the Aakash to the government for about $50 apiece. In turn, the government is looking to subsidize enough of the cost to make it available to students at about $35, not much more than the cost of a fairly basic mobile phone.

But cost is still at the heart of most complaints about the Aakash, from people who say the government is buying expensive gadgetry when it should be addressing the real problem: that India's education system is a mess.

Research: Video games help with creativity in boys and girls

Children who play video games are more creative. That finding, thought to be the first demonstration of a relationship between technology use and creativity, comes from a new study of nearly 500 12-year-olds in Michigan, conducted by researchers at Michigan State University's Children and Technology Project.

Already published online, the study is expected to be included in the March 2012 issue of the journal Computers in Human Behavior. The children were given creative thinking tests – shown a drawing and asked to expand on it or comment on what it means – and then asked about their use of cell phones, computers, the Internet and video games. Only with video games was there a correlation to creativity, the researchers say, and that was true for boys and girls, and across all races. The study found that boys played video games more than girls did; boys also preferred violent games and sports games, while girls favored games involving interaction with others (human or nonhuman). Among the games the children said they played: The Legend of Zelda, Super Smash Brothers, Madden NFL Football, Animal Crossing, Half-Life 2, Need for Speed, Star Wars games and Spider Solitaire.

Use the market to allocate spectrum

[Commentary] Congress is now considering legislation to grant the FCC new authority to hold voluntary incentive auctions for spectrum.

This legislation would alleviate shortages of spectrum that are threatening to hold back the development of a wireless broadband platform capable of competing with wireline platforms. It would boost the economy and advance our progress toward a more efficient, market-oriented spectrum regime. The incentive-auction idea, which came out of the Obama Administration’s Broadband Task Force, is aimed at freeing up some of the 120 MHz of spectrum currently used by broadcast TV to make it available for the new wireless uses -- primarily broadband -- that consumers (and businesses) are demanding. The benefits of such a move are clear: while wireless broadband use is soaring even though consumers have to pay for it, only about 10 percent of TV viewers watch over over-the-air broadcasting even though it is free.

So, the decision before Congress is really quite simple: if it wants to maximize both economic efficiency and deficit reduction, it will reject calls to increase the amount of unlicensed spectrum. Congress can best ensure continued innovation in wireless communications by supporting the allocation of spectrum through the marketplace.

[Lenard is president of the Technology Policy Institute]