July 2012

Lawmakers cheer NFL change to blackout rule

A trio of lawmakers has come out cheering for the National Football League’s recent decision to change its TV blackout rule.

Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY) have touted the league owners’ recent decision to let teams decide whether local TV broadcasters can air games if the stadium is at least 85 percent full. The original NFL rule had required broadcasters to black out the games if the local team did not sell out the stadium. Sen Brown said that the decision ensured “that all [Cincinnati] Bengals fans can root for the home team — not just those who can afford tickets.” The Ohio senator has previously said that the recovering economy and high unemployment rate has caused more fans to stay home than go to games. Sen Blumenthal called the new policy “a step in the right direction.”

FCC examining storm damage to area phone networks after 911 calls failed

The Federal Communications Commission is looking into the damage that the massive storm that swept from the Midwest into the Northeast on June 29 caused to wireless and landline phone networks in the mid-Atlantic.

As of the morning of July 2, 16 percent of cell towers in West Virginia were still disabled. Nearly 11 percent of Maryland's towers were down, as well as 9 percent in Virginia and 3 percent in Washington, D.C., according to the FCC. Widespread power outages also caused problems for many 911 call centers in the region. Lauren Kravetz, a spokeswoman for the FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, said the commission is still investigating the problems with emergency calls, but that 911 operators might have been unable to identify a caller's number and location. She said it is unclear how many people were unable to make an emergency call at all.

Companies see spike in cyberattacks on critical infrastructure systems

Companies that operate critical infrastructure systems have reported a sharp rise in cybersecurity incidents over a three-year period, according to a new report from an arm of the Department of Homeland Security.

Companies reported 198 cyber incidents in 2011, up from 41 incidents in 2010 and just nine in 2009, the report said. The rise in reported incidents comes as the Senate is gridlocked on legislation that would require operators of critical infrastructure to meet new cybersecurity standards. The report could provide fodder for lawmakers looking to move Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (I-CT) cybersecurity bill to the floor. The bill has been waiting for floor time since it was introduced in February, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has repeatedly said he plans to act on the measure this year. The bulk of the cybersecurity incidents in 2011 were reported by companies in the water sector, accounting for about 41 percent of the incidents submitted to the department’s cyber emergency response team for industrial control systems, known as ICS-CERT. Companies in the energy sector accounted for 33 percent and 44 percent of the reported incidents in 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Free Press drops network neutrality suit

Free Press dropped its lawsuit over the Federal Communications Commission's network neutrality rules. The group had argued that the FCC’s rules did not go far enough, and the goal of its lawsuit was to force the FCC to expand the scope of the regulations.

The Free Press suit alleged that the rules arbitrarily provided less protection for wireless Internet access, such as through smartphones, than traditional wired Internet access. "We felt that there were better ways to accomplish our goals of promoting Internet freedom, and decided to direct our resources elsewhere in the continued campaign to preserve the open Internet," said Matt Wood, Free Press policy director.

Top TV Stations in Top 50 Markets Must Send FCC Political Files By Early August

The top four television stations in the top 50 markets will have to start sending their political files to the Federal Communications Commission for online posting starting the first week of August.

Teen's Petition Leads to 'Seventeen' Body Image Pledge

Two months ago, 14-year-old Julia Bluhm of Waterville, ME decided that she was tired of listening to her ballet classmates complain about their bodies, which weren’t always as rail-thin or clear-skinned as those of the retouched models in their favorite magazines. So Bluhm, a member of SPARK (an organization that aims to end the sexualization of girls in media), started a petition on Change.org to ask Seventeen magazine to print one unaltered photo spread a month. And after collecting nearly 85,000 signatures, staging a demonstration outside of Seventeen’s New York offices, launching a Twitter campaign, and meeting with editor in chief Ann Shoket, the teen magazine finally listened.

In the August issue of Seventeen, Shoket wrote an editor’s letter addressing the concerns of Bluhm and her supporters. “Recently I’ve heard from some girls who were concerned that we’d strayed from our promise to show real girls as they really are… Like all magazines, we retouch images -- removing wrinkles in fabric, stray hair, a few zits, random bra straps -- but we never alter the way the girls on our pages really look,” wrote Shoket. “While we work hard behind the scenes to make sure we’re being authentic, your notes made me realize that it was time for us to be more public about our commitment.” So as an extension of its ongoing Body Peace Project, Seventeen is launching the Body Peace Treaty, which includes pledges to “never change girls’ body or face shapes… always feature real girls and models who are healthy,” and “be totally up-front about what goes into our photo shoots.”

Netflix just became cable’s biggest TV network

Netflix subscribers watched more than one billion hours of video in June, according to the company’s CEO Reed Hastings. That means that U.S. subscribers watched around 80 minutes of Netflix per day last month, which makes the service more popular than any traditional U.S. cable network, estimated BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield.

Social Media Passionate and Divided Over Court’s Health Care Ruling

From “Crushing New Taxes” to “a step in the right direction,” social media leapt into action following the Supreme Court ruling last Thursday which let the Affordable Care Act stand – including the controversial element requiring all individuals to obtain health insurance by 2014.

The response was passionate, and at first heavily tilted toward those in favor of the ruling, according to a special report by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. But by the end of the weekend, the tenor of the conversation had changed as those in opposition became more vocal. This sentiment matches closely the divided public opinion over the health care ruling. Each of the three platforms studied—Twitter, Facebook and blogs—came down in somewhat different places. On Twitter, where the conversation was by far the heaviest of the three platforms (some 2.1 million statements in all), users were evenly split between those who favored the ruling and those who opposed it (18% of the conversation voiced support for the ruling while 17% voiced opposition). On Facebook, dissenters slightly edged out those in favor (29% opposed and 25% in favor). And in blogs, opposition to the ruling outweighed support by nearly two-to-one (29% opposed versus 15% in favor). These are some the findings of PEJ’s study of 2,133,392 statements on Twitter, 82,770 on Facebook and 20,459 on blogs from the time the ruling was announced, 10:15 a.m. Thursday June 28, through Sunday, July 1.

Searls: 'We do not need Do Not Track legislation'

Imagine stopping at an information kiosk during a long road trip to use the rest room and check some maps, then later finding GPS tracking devices unwittingly attached to your car that have monitored everywhere you've traveled since you left that information kiosk.

That's how Doc Searls, a fellow at the Center for Information Technology & Society and the author of the Intention Economy, describes browsing the Internet. A good example is Dictionary.com. The online dictionary often appears at the top of search engine results when users are looking for a quick definition. Once they've visited the actual site to get that definition, they're targeted by 234 tracking mechanisms. The only difference between these two examples is that, when online, most people never see that GPS tracking device.

"You don't expect someone to stick something to your car and track where you're going, and yet that's normative now, because there's a kind of no-harm, no-foul orientation to that," Searls says. "It's not that we in any genuine sense think that's OK. It's that 99.99% of people have no idea what's going on because it's out of sight, out of mind."

Inside Verizon’s attack on network neutrality

[Commentary] Verizon is taking aim at network neutrality regulations enacted by the Federal Communications Commission with an outsized legal appeal.

The company’s 116-page tome filed on the evening of July 2 has a glossary, 53 pages of legal argument, inflammatory prose on regulating the Internet and even a claim that the FCC is trampling the First Amendment rights of ISPs. It’s all a bit much but Verizon may prevail. That’s because, underneath all the bluster, Verizon has a strong core argument that the FCC overstepped its bounds in enacting these net neutrality rules. The FCC, you see, can regulate the physical pipes over which packets travel on the network pretty stringently, but less so the actual service or content those packets are meant to deliver. Consider that the FCC can regulate roads but not the mail delivery using those roads. The question of the FCC’s authority to regulate broadband is the biggest issue and likely the one on which the case will hinge. This same court has already rejected the FCC’s authority to regulate broadband in the 2010 Comcast case, and it may again. The FCC’s response to the suit is due in September, so we’ll have to wait until then to see the agency’s response and until December or January 2013 for the case to be heard before the court. The hope is we’ll have a ruling in spring of 2013.