Google Agreement Sets a Bad Precedent of Special Treatment, Says FTC Commissioner
The Federal Trade Commission’s search settlement with Google “creates very bad precedent and may lead to the impression that well-heeled firms such as Google will receive special treatment at the Commission,” wrote Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch in a dissenting statement.
That’s both because he doesn’t think Google violated antitrust laws and because he doesn’t think the non-binding search agreement Google made has any teeth. Rosch’s pithy take: “In other words, after promising an elephant more than a year ago, the Commission instead has brought forth a couple of mice.” Commissioner Rosch, a Republican who is known as a bit of a lone-wolf thinker, is on his second-to-last day at the agency, as his replacement was confirmed earlier this week. Commissioner Rosch voted along with the rest of the five commissioners to close their search investigation and with the majority to discipline Google on standards-essential patents. But he abstained from voting for Google’s voluntary settlement agreement and a statement on the patent matter. By stretching to catch Google on something — anything — the FTC reached too far, Commissioner Rosch argued. The two issues the FTC convinced Google to back down on are scraping content to display in search “snippets” and allowing AdWords users to manage their ad campaigns across multiple platforms.