Hearing Recap: Equipping Carriers and Agencies in the Wireless Era
The House Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, chaired by Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), held a hearing on “Equipping Carriers and Agencies in the Wireless Era.” The subcommittee heard from government and private sector witnesses as members continue to discuss ways to meet the needs of wireless carriers and federal agencies in a time of limited spectrum and financial resources. Last Congress, Chairman Walden and Ranking Member Anna Eshoo (R-CA) created a working group, led by Reps. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) and Doris Matsui (R-CA) that focused on federal spectrum use. At the hearing, House Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) asked Chairman Walden and Ranking Member Eshoo to hold monthly meetings with the National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Department of Defense (DOD) to ensure efforts to upgrade government systems and repurpose spectrum for commercial use stay on track.
The Verge reports that many members of the subcommittee sharply criticized the military and the NTIA for being too slow in opening up government-controlled wireless spectrum to consumers and private companies. An effort to have federal government agencies auction-off their spectrum to companies or share it has been in the works since 2004, but has been slow to see results, visibly angering lawmakers. "It has been slow so far, more like dial-up I'd say, rather than broadband," said Billy Long (R-MO).
At one point, Rep Eshoo unleashed a barrage of accusatory questions at Teri Takai, the US Defense Department's chief information officer, asking why the Defense Department had not yet published at estimate of what it would cost to shift some of its systems to using less spectrum, thereby freeing up more for public use. "I have to say that the 'same old, same old' that has prevailed for years, simple is not going to be accepted around here. It just can't be," Rep Eshoo said. Takai said that the reason the agency had not done a cost-estimate for what it would take the Defense Department to give up the 1755 to 1780 spectrum band because it still needed "some direction" from the NTIA on how a spectrum auction would work. "Do you sit down and talk to each other?" Rep Eshoo asked Takai, point blank. "Why wouldn't the two of you sit down and talk about it. Why am I even having to ask this question again?...This is frustrating." But Takai also pointed out that the Defense Department had serious concerns about giving up, sharing, or otherwise "re-allocating" its spectrum because it currently uses much of it for military communications. "It causes us interference problems because we'd run on a smaller band," Takai said, adding that when it came to combat pilots in the Air Force and other armed services, "it would limit the number of training missions we could fly at the same time."
But lawmakers did manage to move the spectrum sharing program forward during the hearing, if only slightly. Christopher Guttman-McCabe, executive vice president of CTIA, a wireless industry lobbying group, came to the hearing with a proposed "roadmap" that pegged the cost of the government giving up the coveted 1755 to 1780 spectrum band as $4.7 billion, and the time frame as 2015. Lawmakers told CTIA to give copies to Takai and the Defense Department.