July 2013

A Different Deal Mania Grips TV

[Commentary] After years of small-bore shifting and tweaking by media companies in an effort to stay in front of consumers, big deals are back on the table.

Using relatively cheap capital, companies in dire need of diversification away from wounded businesses like print are going shopping. “It’s time to gobble or get gobbled,” a media analyst said. Business people could not be blamed for thinking that they had seen this movie before. Someone blows a whistle in a particular media space and suddenly a company is either a hunter or the hunted. Rhetoric heats up, as do prices, and before you know it investment bankers are racking up fees, reporters finally have deals to cover and moguls are in full frolic.

Ex-FBI chief Louis Freeh warns of cyber threats

United States intelligence officials must do a better job analyzing the mountains of global Internet, telephone and financial data they already collect to thwart the cyber terrorists of tomorrow, according to former FBI director Louis Freeh.

Speaking to The Associated Press ahead of the Global Intelligence Forum in Ireland, Freeh said hackers seeking to take control of, or take down, key pieces of U.S. infrastructure could do more damage than the attackers of 9/11. He said computer systems controlling power plants, the navigation of aircraft and ships, and even the switching of street lights could be hijacked to gridlock societies and kill large groups of people. “People traditionally think of this threat as somebody stealing their identity or their credit card number, or making it inconvenient to go to the ATM [cash machine]. That’s a very benign view of the potential for what cyber terrorism really is,” Freeh said. “You could manipulate transportation systems, aviation guidance systems, highway safety systems, maritime operations systems. You could shut down an energy system in the northeast U.S. in the middle of winter. The potential for mass destruction in terms of life and property is really only limited by [the attackers’] access and success in penetrating and hijacking these networks,” he said.

AT&T isn't nearly as bad as you think

AT&T's 4G-LTE network has been rated faster than Verizon's network by four independent studies. Its coverage area is growing rapidly, and it will be available to just as many Americans as Verizon's 4G network by the end of next year. That's a far cry from where AT&T was just a few years ago.

After failing to anticipate how much bandwidth iPhone users would suck up with app downloads, Web browsing and video streaming, AT&T saw its 3G network became practically unusable in major cities such as New York and San Francisco. AT&T has consistently been rated the worst network by Consumer Reports readers since the iPhone launched six years ago. The network has ranked dead last in the magazine's customer satisfaction survey for three straight years. But perception and reality are diverging.

TV Is Americans' Main Source of News

Television is the main place Americans say they turn to for news about current events (55%), leading the Internet, at 21%.

Nine percent say newspapers or other print publications are their main news source, followed by radio, at 6%. These results are based on a Gallup poll of 2,048 national adults conducted June 20-24, in which Americans were asked to say, unaided, what they consider to be their main source of news about U.S. and global events. More than half the references to television are general, with 26% simply saying they watch television or TV news, 4% saying they watch local TV news, and 2% saying they watch the "evening news." The two leading 24-hour cable news channels -- Fox News and CNN -- are named by 8% and 7%, respectively. However, no other specific channel -- including MSNBC, PBS, BBC, and all of the U.S. broadcast networks that once dominated the news landscape -- is mentioned by more than 1% of Americans. The vast majority of those citing the Internet -- 18% of all Americans -- either mention the Internet generally or say they get their news "online." Two percent identify Facebook, Twitter, or social media as their source, while 1% mention a specific online news site.

The PUC's not the commission it used to be

The political clout of Michael Peevey, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, could be waning.

This year, Peevey and the commission he has led since 2002 have been the target of legislative inquiries for the way it regulates for-profit electric, natural gas and telephone companies, limousine services and private water companies. Lawmakers are up in arms about perceived sloppy budgeting, alleged conflicts of interest and proposed punishment for Pacific Gas & Electric Co., whose safety procedures have been under scrutiny after the 2010 fatal natural gas explosion in San Bruno. Peevey, 75, of LaCañada Flintridge is even having trouble with his own commission members, all appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown. He was named to the PUC by Gov. Gray Davis and reappointed by Arnold Schwarzenegger.

WWOR-TV in New Jersey Replaces Nightly News

Depending on one’s perspective, what the New Jersey-based television station WWOR is doing this month is irresponsible or innovative.

Last week, with no notice, the station canceled its 10 p.m. half-hour of news, the only newscast it had left. On July 8, it will try something new at 10, a youthful newsmagazine called “Chasing New Jersey.” The anchor, a real estate executive and onetime Republican candidate for Congress, will be called the “ringleader” on the program; the reporters will be called “chasers.” The shift in programming strategy is bound to be watched in Washington, where WWOR, broadcast on Channel 9, has been under regulatory scrutiny for years. The station is in a unique position, being the only big commercially owned broadcaster in New Jersey, whose 8.9 million residents otherwise see television news mainly from stations in New York City and Philadelphia. WWOR’s license for the public airwaves, granted by the Federal Communications Commission, comes with the condition that the license-holder pay special attention to the northern part of the state.

FCC Approves Softbank-Sprint-Clearwire Transactions

On July 5, the Federal Communications Commission released an order allowing the applications of SOFTBANK CORP. (“SoftBank”), its indirect subsidiary Starburst II, Inc. (“Starburst II”), and Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint” and, together with SoftBank and Starburst II, the “Applicants”) to transfer control to SoftBank and Starburst II of various wireless licenses and leases, domestic and international section 214 authorizations, earth station authorizations, interests in submarine cable licenses, and cable television relay service station licenses held by Sprint and its subsidiaries, and the various wireless licenses and leases held by Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”). The Applicants also requested a declaratory ruling that it is in the public interest for the foreign ownership of Sprint and its licensee subsidiaries to exceed the 25 percent foreign ownership benchmark in section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934 (the “Act”).

Based on the record and the FCC’s review of the competitive effects of the proposed transactions – the acquisition of Sprint by SoftBank and Sprint’s acquisition of 100 percent of the stock of Clearwire – the FCC finds that approval of the transactions will serve the public interest. The FCC notes at the outset that the investment by SoftBank in the U.S. market differs from wireless transactions in which two domestic competitors with overlapping service areas or spectrum holdings are seeking approval to merge, thereby eliminating an existing competitor. Rather, SoftBank, which has no attributable interests in any spectrum licenses in the United States, is seeking approval, inter alia, to use approximately $16.64 billion to purchase shares from existing Sprint shareholders, and plans to provide an additional $5 billion to Sprint that it can invest in its network and use to provide wireless broadband service.

The FCC finds that these proposed transactions are not likely to result in competitive or other public interest harms in the provision of mobile wireless services. In addition, the FCC anticipates that the proposed transactions likely will result in key public interest benefits, acceleration of deployment of advanced mobile broadband services and enhanced competition in the mobile wireless market, through the increased investment by Softbank in the Sprint and Clearwire networks.
Further, the FCC finds that the indirect foreign ownership of Sprint and its licensee subsidiaries by SoftBank complies with section 310(b)(4) of the Act. Finally, in response to petitions for reconsideration, the FCC affirms that the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau properly processed as pro forma the applications that were filed to effectuate the transfer of the shares in Clearwire held by Eagle River Holdings, LLC to Sprint. Thus, the FCC concludes that the transactions are in the public interest, and approves them subject to the conditions contained herein.

Using E-Mail Data to Connect the Dots of Your Life

What is e-mail metadata anyway?

It’s information about the people you’re sending e-mails to and receiving e-mails from, and the times that the messages were sent — as opposed to the contents of the messages. It’s the digital equivalent of a postal service worker looking at your mail envelope instead of opening it up and reading what’s inside. That sounds harmless, but it turns out your e-mail metadata can be used to connect the dots of your life story. I learned this from participating in Immersion, a project by M.I.T.’s Media Laborator. Immersion is a tool that mines your e-mail metadata and automatically stitches it all together into an interactive graphic. The result is a creepy spider web showing all the people you’ve corresponded with, how they know each other, and who your closest friends and professional partners are. In an Immersion chart, each person is represented by dots. The more you’ve e-mailed with the person, the bigger the dot gets.

Snowden revelations imperil cyber hacking talks with China

Revelations of U.S. spying on Chinese universities and businesses risk undermining cybersecurity talks with China scheduled for next week. The Obama Administration had hoped to press China on the issue during the fifth round of the U.S.-China Strategic & Economic Dialogue. Instead, it finds itself on the defensive amid former contractor Edward Snowden's allegations that the National Security Agency has been spying not only on the Chinese government but on universities, students and businesses as well. “The U.S. in the cyber arena is trying to draw a bright red line,” said Kenneth Lieberthal, a former senior director for Asia at the White House who's now with the Brookings China Center. “I think the Snowden revelations clearly give China an increased opportunity to muddy the waters.”

Intelligence chief Clapper apologizes for ‘erroneous’ statement to Congress

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has apologized for a “clearly erroneous” statement he made to Congress over the National Security Agency’s surveillance activities.

In a letter to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Clapper said he was mistaken when he told Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) that the United States did not collect data on millions of Americans. “My response was clearly erroneous — for which I apologize,” Clapper wrote in the letter dated June 21. “While my staff acknowledged the error to Senator Wyden’s staff soon after the hearing, I can now openly correct it because the existence of the metadata collection program has been declassified,” Clapper said. Clapper’s statements at the March 12 Senate hearing have received enormous scrutiny ever since news stories revealed the NSA’s telephone and Internet surveillance programs last month. Clapper directly contradicted those stories in his comments on March 12.