France: US Wiretapped Envoys, Newspaper Reports, Citing Leaks
Apparently, the National Security Agency wiretapped the offices of the French mission to the United Nations and the French Embassy in Washington.
Apparently, the National Security Agency wiretapped the offices of the French mission to the United Nations and the French Embassy in Washington.
[Commentary] Researchers have been warning for more than a decade that the United States was losing ground to its economic competitors abroad and would eventually fall behind them unless it provided more of its citizens with the high-level math, science and literacy skills necessary for the new economy. Naysayers dismissed this as alarmist. But recent data showing American students and adults lagging behind their peers abroad in terms of important skills suggest that the long-predicted peril has arrived. The United States has yet to take on a sense of urgency about this issue. If that does not happen soon, the country will pay a long-term price.
[Commentary] Stunning new details continue to emerge from Edward Snowden’s leaks about the vast electronic data mining carried out by the National Security Agency, setting off one diplomatic aftershock after another. Reports based on Snowden’s information have alleged American eavesdropping on France, Germany, Britain, Brazil, Mexico, European Union offices and European diplomatic missions. More revelations are likely.
The Obama Administration’s response has been that the United States seeks to gather foreign intelligence as other nations do. But the very scale of America’s clandestine electronic operations appears to be undercutting America’s “soft power” — its ability to influence global affairs through example and moral leadership. The fact is that most nations practice electronic surveillance and that citizens everywhere surrender personal data voluntarily to digital services and social networks. That is why free countries must place stern limits on the security institutions allowed to function in the shadows.
AT&T has moved to effectively raise the price on some of its dedicated data and voice lines for businesses, prompting complaints from groups representing cellphone carriers to ATM owners which say the market is uncompetitive.
The telecom giant notified customers earlier this month that it would no longer offer extended contracts -- and the discounts that come with them -- to companies using these high-capacity connections, known as "special access lines." Sprint and other telecommunications companies that buy the connections claimed the move was anticompetitive, and complained to the Federal Communications Commission. Once the FCC receives official notice of the change from AT&T, the agency will have 15 days to respond or the changes will automatically take effect. The agency can still suspend the changes after they have taken effect. Rising prices of high capacity connections could impact a broad array of businesses from financial institutions, manufacturers and retailers that use these lines to connect ATMs, gas pumps and warehouse inventories.
Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft and other tech powerhouses have mounted a quiet new lobbying push around government surveillance laws as they seek to influence potential congressional reforms to controversial National Security Agency programs.
Thrust into the spotlight as a result of Edward Snowden’s leaks, these industry leaders historically haven’t voiced loud support for restraining the NSA’s legal authorities to collect data. But many tech firms’ third-quarter lobbying reports, filed this week and totaling millions of dollars, demonstrate Silicon Valley is devoting more of its bandwidth to an emerging surveillance debate that could affect many companies’ bottom lines. Even Washington-wary Apple reported lobbying between the months of July and September on topics “related to government requests for data.” Never before has Apple explicitly talked up that topic here in the Beltway, according to a review of its previous filings. The company spent almost $1 million on lobbying during the third quarter — its most in D.C. to date — to lobby on a range of policy issues.
Members of Congress will meet with privacy advocates, a privacy researcher and an online advertising industry representative to talk about digital privacy on Oct 23.
The meeting will be the second of ten meetings about online privacy held by the House Commerce Committee's Bipartisan Privacy Working Group, led by Reps. Peter Welch (D-VT) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). The meeting will include Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, Susan Grant, director of consumer protection at the Consumer Federation of America, Mercatus Center Senior Researcher Adam Theirer and Rachel Thomas, vice president of government affairs at the Direct Marketing Association, which represents online advertisers. Theirer said he is going to discuss with the working group members “the benefits of data collection for the information economy and the provision of digital services.” Chester and Grant have both been vocal and critical members of stakeholder privacy efforts, including the recently-concluded Department of Commerce initiative to improve transparency around mobile data collection.
[Commentary] Connected devices are becoming inextricably tied to identity.
It is hard to argue that we are entering an age where all of our devices — even items we never would have called “devices” before — are Internet-enabled. Teslas, “smart” TVs like the Vizio E Series, and the seemingly dozens of activity-tracking wristbands are all widely available and popular, and deeply integrate Internet connectivity into their respective user experiences. But looking deeper, you can see something else is being baked into these new technologies. Namely, we’re leveraging our social (and some would say, “real”) identities to interact with these products, and building comprehensive profiles of not just our interests, political beliefs and relationship statuses, etc., but of our behaviors, too.
The list of connected “things” is growing quickly, creating a network of devices that will be able to talk to one another via one central identity. And when our social profiles are connected to the activities we take part in, whether it is running, listening to music or brushing our teeth, the possibilities for personalization are nearly endless. Ultimately I believe that this type of personalization, when measured with healthy privacy controls, will result in real, tangible benefits for marketers and consumers alike.
[Salyer is CEO of Gigya]
Facing a fierce public outcry after allowing a violent video to return, Facebook said that it had removed the posting. But the episode underscored the recurring difficulties that popular online sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Google's YouTube have in weighing whether to let users share potentially offensive or even horrifying material.
"Every step along the way, Facebook is making a series of judgments about the appropriateness of content for its audience," said Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University. "There is no way for Facebook to make all of its users completely happy about its editorial choices." Website operators have confronted similar dilemmas since the dawn of the Internet. But while most Internet companies promote the Web as a forum for free speech, many have struggled with hosting offensive material, even after developing extensive policies and employing squadrons of content reviewers and lawyers to implement them.
A little more than a year away from an election that will decide which of two Democrats will represent California’s 17th Congressional District, Ro Khanna lags far behind the incumbent, Mike Honda, in the polls. But thanks to his well-heeled friends and supporters in the tech community, Khanna has far out-raised the veteran lawmaker.
His treasure chest is big enough to afford hiring a fleet of top campaign operatives from Barack Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign. Only 36 years old, the intellectual property lawyer has already served a stint in Obama’s Commerce Department and written a book about how to boost manufacturing in the United States. He’s someone to take seriously. The 17th includes the heart of Silicon Valley.
Google’s nonprofit arm announced that it has contributed $2 million to the De Novo Group, a Berkeley organization working to deliver affordable broadband Internet access to rural communities, starting in Northern California. The broad mission of the organization’s “Celerate” project is “to get the next billion people online,” said Yahel Ben-David, president of De Novo. Or at least onto faster and cheaper Internet connections, which studies link to improved economic development and educational achievement. The project, a collaboration between UC Berkeley and Stanford University researchers, is now seeking applications from interested communities in the region. The service won’t be free, but should be cheaper than and superior to existing options, Ben-David said.
The ideal candidate communities in Northern California would be:
© 1994-2025 Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. All Rights Reserved.