Big Four Affiliates Challenge Parts of Incentive Auction
The Big Four network TV affiliate associations all asked the Federal Communications Commission to revise the incentive spectrum auction framework before it holds the auction -- now sometime in early 2016 -- saying that, if left uncorrected, it would hurt stations and the public.
They have bones to pick with the repacking and reimbursement parts of the order. Most are things they had asked for but were not in the order when it was released in May. The petition described them as "limited" asks, but they were big ones. Those include not repacking any more stations than can be compensated with the $1.75 billion fund Congress has set aside for moving expenses; allow for reimbursement of expenses of stations not moving but related to the move. "Congress did not intend for television stations to subsidize the costs of reallocating spectrum to other wireless uses," they said, pointedly, in their petition. And if the FCC does not treat that $1.75 as a budget, it should require winning wireless bidders to make up the difference. They also want the FCC to reconsider some of the hard deadlines for applications, construction and transition; complete international spectrum coordination with Canada and Mexico before the auction, consider bagging the variable band plan and going with the national plan broadcasters advocated, rethink "rigid" broadcaster consumer education requirements about new channel assignments -- they argue stations will have plenty of marketplace incentive to let viewers know where they are, and rethink its use of the TVStudy software in calculating TV station interference and coverage areas.