February 2015

Don’t limit high-speed broadband to big cities

[Commentary] Internet service providers are stepping up their game, building the infrastructure necessary to provide high-speed Internet services in communities across the country. This is great, especially for big cities that have the incentives (read: population) needed to encourage private providers to upgrade broadband networks and provide customers with an essential utility of the 21st century. But it doesn’t work out so well for rural towns and small communities. Because of population size and infrastructure limitations, many residents are subjected to slow, out-of-date services or are left without access to commercial providers altogether.

With high-speed broadband playing a larger and larger role in growing a community’s economy and improving its residents’ ways of life, this is neither acceptable nor fair. The Federal Communications Commission is about to help rural towns and small communities reach their full potential by letting their residents have the choice of access to high-speed, affordable broadband. This is a welcome step. But there is more to be done. As a senator representing seven rural counties and a resident of a small community myself, I am speaking out for all of those who are being held hostage to 20th-century technology. Let us grow our economies, improve our governments’ performance and create jobs for our communities. Let us have Internet choice(s).

[Republican State Sen Janice Bowling represents the 16th District of Tennessee in the General Assembly]

Why government is trying to boost Maine’s worst-in-the-nation Internet speeds

Maine lawmakers face about 35 bills dealing with broadband expansion, most of which would increase the amount of money spent to expand networks or otherwise add oomph to the ConnectME Authority, which gives out about $1 million per year in grants for broadband projects in places with only dial-up connections or no connection at all. The issue also is on the table for a range of cities and towns. Bangor, Bar Harbor and Ellsworth are among the municipalities looking at examples from Chattanooga (TN), and Maine municipalities such as Rockport and South Portland to figure out whether spending public money on broadband expansion would yield appreciable economic benefits.

Proponents say the upside isn’t just attracting businesses. It would allow seniors to age in place using “telemedicine,” meet expectations and needs of people considering moving to Maine, and give a leg up to people and companies already in the state. What’s Time Warner’s problem with municipal broadband? In one word: Competition. Time Warner is encouraging Maine officials not to invest public money where broadband networks -- such as its own -- already exist.

Fiber Internet popping up in Michigan, offering speeds 100 times faster than cable

The fastest Internet connections available to Michiganders are coming from small Michigan companies you've probably never heard of. In 2011, Ann Arbor was vying with cities around the nation to get the first installation of Google Fiber, a connection that was faster and better than anything around. The city lost, but what once took an Internet giant to accomplish is now being done by small companies in pockets across the state.

CBO Scores Federal Communications Commission Consolidated Reporting Act

The Federal Communications Commission Consolidated Reporting Act (H.R. 734) would require the Federal Communications Commission to prepare a biennial report for the Congress that assesses certain characteristics of the communications industry. In all, the bill would eliminate more than 20 reports and notices, including some that remain in current law even though deadlines for their completion have passed. Based on information from the FCC, Congressional Budget Office estimates that implementing the provisions of HR 734 would not have a significant effect on the agency’s costs. Any additional expenses the FCC would incur to prepare the new assessment of the communications industry would be offset by a reduction in costs that would otherwise be incurred for reports that would be eliminated under the bill.

FCC Commissioner Clyburn Seeks Balance Between Strong Net Neutrality Rules, "Clarity" for Investors

Commissioner Mignon Clyburn of the Federal Communications Commission has asked FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to eliminate from new network neutrality rules a new legal category of “broadband subscriber access services,” which was created as an additional point of legal authority for the FCC to monitor the ways that companies hand off traffic on the back end of the Internet.

Those deals, known as “interconnection” arrangements, became a point of contention when Netflix accused Comcast and other companies of erecting “Internet tolls” before easily passing Web traffic from one network to another.

The initial plan sought by Chairman Wheeler would allow the FCC to investigate and take action against deals that are “not just and reasonable,” according to a fact sheet released by the FCC.

Eliminating the new legal category could make it trickier for the FCC to police those arrangements, said the FCC officials. Other FCC officials have previously said that the broader act of reclassifying broadband Internet service would, in and of itself, give the commission enough powers to oversee interconnection deals.

Clyburn’s changes also would replace a new standard for Internet service providers’ conduct, which was meant to act as a catchall rule for any future behavior that might abuse consumers. That standard would be swapped out with potentially narrower language from 2010 net neutrality rules that prevented “unreasonable discrimination.”

In a speech at the Federal Communications Bar Association, Commissioner Clyburn said that she was “pleased” with the initial draft but also hinted that she might need some fixes to strike that balance between “strong” protections for consumers and “clarity” for investors.

“Some have expressed concerns about allowing private rights of action in court, failing to consider the impact on smaller [Internet service providers], that including interconnection goes too far or that the case-by-case approach does not go far enough and that the new conduct rule may not be as strong as the previous unreasonable discrimination rule,” she said.

How the FCC could use an obscure Internet power to change the pay-TV market

On Feb 26, the Federal Communications Commission will vote on the government's strict new network neutrality rules for Internet providers. And while the proposed regulations are mainly focused on whether companies like Comcast can block or slow Web sites, a small piece of the rules could give the government wider authority over television programming -- and by extension, your TV experience. Here's how.

The FCC has a mission: To promote the rapid deployment of high-speed Internet. Under this mission, codified in Section 706 of the Communications Act, it's seen fit to knock down what it sees as barriers to the rollout of broadband. Some Washington lobbyists are beginning to argue that this mission doesn't just cover the Internet. Advocates for pay-TV providers are saying the FCC should use Section 706 to act more aggressively against the companies that produce TV content. Why? Because the pay-TV providers think the content producers are charging them too much for programming -- and because programming costs eat into the budget for building, say, cable broadband, what hurts pay-TV providers could hurt the spread of broadband. If the FCC someday decides that yes, the cost of TV programming is hurting the rollout of broadband, it's not that big a leap to regulatory action. Those actions could have powerful implications for what you pay your cable provider, among other things.

Lawsuit accuses Comcast, Al Sharpton of discriminating against black-owned media

A lawsuit against Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Rev. Al Sharpton and the NAACP alleges that the media companies discriminated against black-owned businesses and paid activists like Sharpton to “whitewash” its practices. The complaint alleges that Comcast gave large donations to Sharpton, the NAACP and other civil rights groups to make it appear that the cable company was promoting diversity, even while it was failing to follow through on a promise to do so.

The lawsuit, seeking $20 billion, was filed in Los Angeles federal court by Entertainment Studios, a television company founded by black producer and comedian Byron Allen and the National Association of African-American Owned Media (NAAAOM). The complaint, which comes as regulators mull a $45-billion merger between Comcast and TWC, alleges that Comcast has refused to do business with Allen and other black media executives. “Comcast has engaged in, and is engaging in, pernicious, intentional racial discrimination in contracting,” it reads. Whether or not it gets anywhere is another question. Both Sharpton and Comcast dismissed the allegations. Sharpton called the lawsuit a “bogus statement from a person who has no credibility” and said that he will be bringing counterclaims for defamation.

Center for Investigative Reporting and Univision
Thursday, March 5, 2015
9 am - 5 pm
RSVP

Agenda

9:00am: Registration and breakfast

10:00am: Opening Remarks from Manami Kano, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

10:15am - 1:00pm: Presentations

  • JoAnn Rullan and Stephen Keppel, Univision Community Empowerment Initiative, “Hispanic Community Impact Through Media”
  • Nuria Net, Fusion
  • Fernando Diaz, CIR
  • Lindsay Green-Barber, CIR, “Content to connect communities: What we’ve learned in the past 12 months”
  • Emily Dufton, The Center for Public Integrity, "More Questions than Answers: Approaching Bilingual Communities with Investigative Reporting"

1:00 - 2:00pm: Lunch

2:00 - 4:00pm: Breakout sessions

4:00 - 5:00pm: Sharing key findings and next steps

Breakfast and lunch will be served. Dissection: Impact G will be followed by a cocktail reception near the venue.



Europe's digital chief takes on Facebook, Google

Europe’s digital economy chief Guenther Oettinger says the European Union should create a single law to protect the data of citizens across Europe from Google and Facebook. Oettinger, who is Germany’s representative to the European Commission, said in a speech that the technology giants are using “an electronic vacuum cleaner” to collect and sell personal data. Oettinger said: “The Americans are in the lead, they’ve got the data, the business models and so the power." Google and Facebook “will go to the member states where data protection is least developed, come along with their electronic vacuum cleaner, take it to California and sell it,” Oettinger said.

Chairman Wicker Looks Forward

Senate Communications Subcommittee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-MS) said that modernizing the Communications Act "would be one of the committee's top priorities" over the next two years. “With all the growth in the technology space, the question is a fresh look and what updates are needed to foster continued innovation and competition."

Chairman Wicker also pointed to oversight of the FCC and said that he wanted to ensure the agency was doing all it could to promote broadband access in rural areas. He also said that he wanted to build on the progress of the FCC’s recent auction of AW-3 airwaves, which brought in nearly $45 billion to the federal government. “Our opinion is that the AWS-3 auction was not only successful, it was surprising successful,” he said. “We are hopeful that the incentive spectrum auction of lowband can be successful also,” Chairman Wicker added, referring to an even more complicated auction scheduled for 2016.