September 2015

Consumer Advisory Committee

Federal Communications Commission
Friday, September 25, 2015
9:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m.

Morning Session

8:30 – 9:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast & Networking

9:00 a.m. Welcome & Call to Order
Debra Berlyn, CAC Chairperson

9:05 – 9:15 a.m. Self Introductions & Meeting Logistics

9:15 – 10:00 a.m. Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Update

Mark Stone, Deputy Bureau Chief, CGB
Karen Peltz Strauss, Deputy Bureau Chief, CGB

10:00 – 10:30 a.M. Robocall Blocking and Caller ID Spoofing
John B. Adams, Deputy Chief, Policy Division, CGB

10:30 - 10:40 A.M. Break

10:40 – 11:00 a.m. Overview of the DSCAT Report
Brendan Murray, Assistant Division Chief, Media Bureau (MB)

11:15 – 11:45 a.m. Update on IP Transition
Daniel Kahn, Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB)

11:45 - 1:00 p.m. Lunch available in Commission Meeting Room

Afternoon Session

1:00 – 1:30 p.m. Progress Report of Open Internet Disclosures Task Force
Debra Berlyn, Chairperson & Task Force Members

1:30 - 3:00 p.m. Working Group Breakout Sessions
{Locations TBA}

3:00 - 3:25 p.m. Report back from Working Groups

3:25 - 3:30 p.m. Comments from the Public

3:30 p.m. Adjournment



Summary of US Objectives in the Trans-Pacific Partnership -- E-Commerce and Telecommunications

The Office of the United States Trade Representative expects that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will put in place the most comprehensive set of rules ever negotiated addressing digital trade and the promotion of Internet-based commerce. TPP is designed to preserve the single, global, digital marketplace to ensure the free flow of global information and data that drive the digital economy. The US intends to promote trade and investment that enhances online speed, access, and quality. Here’s the US objectives:

Secure commitments not to impose customs duties on digital products (e.g., software, music, video, e-books).

Ensure non-discriminatory treatment of digital products transmitted electronically and guarantee that these products will not face government-sanctioned discrimination based on the nationality or territory in which the product is produced.

Establish requirements that support a single, global Internet, including ensuring cross-border data flows, consistent with governments’ legitimate interest in regulating for purposes of privacy protection.

Establish rules against localization requirements that force businesses to place computer infrastructure in each market in which they seek to operate, rather than allowing them to offer services from network centers that make business sense.

Ensure close cooperation among TPP countries to help businesses, especially small- and medium-sized businesses, overcome obstacles and take advantage of electronic commerce.

Secure commitments to provide reasonable network access for telecommunications suppliers through interconnection and access to physical facilities.

Establish provisions promoting choice of technology and competitive alternatives to address the high cost of international mobile roaming.

Promote public participation and transparency in the development of laws and regulations affecting the Internet, including with opportunities for public comment.

Promote competitive supply of telecommunications services by addressing key bottlenecks.

How the Trans-Pacific Partnership Jeopardizes Fair Use

Public Knowledge and 15 other global civil society groups sent a letter to the officials of the various governments that will meet and finalize the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) provisions, urging them to rewrite parts of the trade agreement’s current intellectual property chapter. This is Public Knowledge’s latest effort to warn governments and the public of the harmful aspects of the TPP, which has been secretly negotiated among government officials behind closed doors.

Recently, we sent letters to the United States Trade Representative and even alerted the White House to the TPP’s potential chilling effects on the right to knowledge and fair use as well as copyright reform efforts of Congress and the Copyright Office. As we stated in our United States Trade Representative letter: “Limitations and exceptions to intellectual property rights are absolutely critical to a functioning marketplace. The digital revolution has ushered in an era of ubiquitous content. Even without actively seeking out knowledge properties, the average American is constantly being exposed to—and interacting with—copyrighted and patented goods. Overbroad intellectual property protections create a minefield of liability through which no consumer, no matter how savvy, can reasonably be expected to navigate.”

Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitutional, court says

The Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination would be breached if two insider trading suspects were forced to turn over the passcodes of their locked mobile phones to the Securities and Exchange Commission, a federal judge ruled Sept 23. "We find, as the SEC is not seeking business records but Defendants' personal thought processes, Defendants may properly invoke their Fifth Amendment right," US District Judge Mark Kearney of Pennsylvania wrote.

Orin Kerr, a constitutional scholar and former federal prosecutor, suggested that the "Fifth Amendment issues raised by the content of the passcode could be addressed by having the defendants just enter in their passcodes rather than handing them over to the government." Kerr added, "Having the defendant enter in his passcode would minimize the Fifth Amendment implications of the compelled compliance, as it would not involve disclosing the potentially incriminating evidence of the passcode itself."

This man was arrested for anti-police Facebook posts. Then, he sued.

In July 2012, police in the village of Arena (WI) conducted a sweep through the community in search of burglary suspects. According to court documents, some of the messages left in response to Officer Nicholas Stroik’s Facebook post were critical of the local police -- and accused them of racism.

One of those comments was from Thomas Smith, who left profane messages on the Facebook page. Stroik deleted Smith’s comments. Then, a lawsuit claimed, the officer sought Smith’s arrest. Smith, who no longer lives in Wisconsin, the week of Sept 21 settled that federal lawsuit that claimed his civil rights had been violated. He will receive a $35,000 payment from the village and three of its officers, Smith’s attorney announced.

Donald Trump, Roger Ailes to meet and discuss 'differences of opinion'

Fox News chairman Roger Ailes, Fox News senior executives and Donald Trump will meet during the week of Sept 28 to discuss their differences, a Fox News spokesperson said.

"Fox News Chairman & CEO Roger Ailes and Donald Trump spoke this morning and plan to have a meeting next week to discuss their differences of opinion regarding Fox's coverage of Mr. Trump's presidential campaign. Ailes will be joined by senior Fox editorial executives. Mr. Trump believes he has been treated unfairly in certain instances. FOX News has held every candidate in this race to the highest journalistic standards throughout our coverage. We believe a candid meeting about our differences is required and that any misunderstandings can be handled without compromising those standards," the spokesperson said.

Verizon says CWA created a false impression of the state of its copper network

Verizon has fired back at the Communications Workers of America's (CWA) claims that it has turned its back on its existing copper networks in its wireline region. In a Federal Communications Commission filing, Verizon said that the CWA misinterpreted a statement it made in a July letter to the FCC about how much it invests on its copper network.

"As we explained in that letter, Verizon takes reasonable steps to ensure its copper network remains healthy and, contrary to CWA's suggestions, has not engaged in widespread 'de facto' retirement of copper," Verizon said. "As part of that discussion, we wrote that Verizon since 2008 has spent more than $200 million on its copper network. CWA has seized on that comment, taken it out of context, and tried to use it to create the false impression that this was all of the money that Verizon has spent to keep copper in service." Verizon contends that the "more than $200 million" it referenced does not relate to all of the capital dollars the company has made in maintaining its copper network.