November 2015

YouTube to Pay Fees for Some Video Makers to Fight Takedowns

Since its inception, YouTube has been embroiled in long and bitter battles over copyright infringement. And over the years, the video site has increased its policing of pirated material. But too often, the company says, the demands of copyright holders to take down videos go too far. Now, YouTube is taking the unusual step of financially supporting YouTube creators so they can fight back.

YouTube said that it would pick up the legal costs of a handful of video creators that the company thinks are the targets of unfair takedown demands. It said the creators it chose legally use third-party content under “fair use” provisions carved out for commentary, criticism, news and parody. An example of fair use is a segment by the TV host Stephen Colbert that rebroadcasts cable news clips for the comedian to react to. YouTube is starting small, initially supporting four video creators, but it said it may expand its program. The company said it wanted to protect free speech and educate users on fair use. But its announcement is also is aimed at strengthening loyalty with video creators. YouTube faces new competition from Facebook, Twitter and traditional media companies that are trying to get consumers to upload more content onto their platforms.

Senators get classified briefing on threats to undersea Internet cables

Military, Intelligence and Homeland Security officials briefed a group of senators on Nov 18 on reports of Russia’s potential threat to underseas fiberoptic cables that make up the backbone of the world’s Internet. The classified briefing came at the request of Sen Roger Wicker (R-MS) after it was reported that US officials were worried that Russia could be planning to sever some of the cables that run along the ocean’s floor. There is no evidence that any of the cables had been intentionally cut, but it has been reported Russian ships and submarines are operating near the cables with increased intensity. While the US has figured out ways to tap the cables to glean data flowing across them, the worry is that Russia could cut them to sabatoge communications flow. Those officials who briefed senators were from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Naval Intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security and the Joint Operations Division for US European Command.

Sen Wicker provided no details from the top-secret briefing but said he would work “in the coming weeks” to provide military and intelligence agencies with tools they need to protect American interests. “Undersea cables are critical to our economy, our communications, and our national security,” he said in a statement. “The United States needs to take seriously the growing Russian threat to these cables.”

If government surveillance expands after Paris, the media will be partly to blame

[Commentary] Hours after the attacks in Paris, Forbes quickly pointed to remarks by a Belgian official who said that Islamic State militants use the PlayStation 4's chat functions as a way to communicate securely. The article also mentioned that a Sony PlayStation 4 was recovered in a police raid connected to the Paris investigation. That report was later undermined by the real facts -- that no PlayStation 4 had been collected and that the Belgian official had been talking about the use of PlayStation technology generally by terrorism suspects. But it was too late. Reports spread across the news industry tying the PlayStation to the attacks (there is a second wave of stories sweeping the Internet trying to undo the damage). On Nov 17, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler suggested that one of the "specific things" Congress could do in response to the Paris attacks would be to revisit the nation's wiretapping laws. Chairman Wheeler even cited the now-debunked reports on the Playstation 4's involvement in the incident, another sign of how the media has played a role in shaping the current policy atmosphere in Washington.

In the wake of any attack, there is always the pressure to do something, anything. Doing nothing until the facts are clear is the politically difficult choice, even if it may be the correct one. The pressure to expand government surveillance predated the Paris attacks. But to the extent that the government now has renewed momentum for those efforts, it's hard to deny that the mainstream media shares some of the responsibility.

Why it’s hard to draw a line between Snowden and the Paris attacks

In a pair of public appearances, CIA Director John O. Brennan made clear that he blames leaks by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden for enabling terrorists to evade detection. “Because of a number of unauthorized disclosures, and a lot of hand-wringing over the government’s role in the effort to try to uncover these terrorists,” Brennan said, the CIA and others agencies have lost use of critical tools needed “to find these terrorists.” But drawing a line from Snowden to the Paris tragedy is problematic, according to some analysts, because even two years after the leaks it is difficult to isolate the extent to which they caused terrorist networks to change the way they communicate.

The revelations that were the source of greatest controversy involved programs that would likely have been of little value in disrupting the Paris plot, experts said. The National Security Agency’s collection of data about the times and durations of billions of domestic phones calls was not designed to pick up calls entirely outside the United States. A second program that relied heavily on cooperation from companies including AOL, Microsoft and Google was aimed at intercepting e-mail and phone calls between foreign operatives and individuals in the United States. Nothing has changed since that revelation to restrict the NSA’s ability to sweep up communications exclusively among foreigners, as was apparently the case for the plot in France.

Trump on ISIS: 'We've got to take back the Internet'

Following the attacks on Paris, Donald Trump suggested the United States would have to "take back the Internet" from ISIS, which he says has been effectively using the web as a recruitment tool. "They're using the Internet, and they're recruiting people," Trump said. "We've got to take back the Internet because they are taking people. They're literally brainwashing people. They're brainwashing our youth... We can't let that happen. We have innocent youth, and they are misguided." But Trump, in another interview, suggested the US wasn't doing enough to stop ISIS. "They’re using the Internet better than we use the Internet," he said. "And we just don’t have a clue. I mean, our people don’t have a clue."

Mark Zuckerberg Gives $20 Million to Help Schools Get Faster Internet

Mark Zuckerberg, who has made global Internet access a top priority through Facebook’s Internet.org project, is now using some of his personal wealth to expand high-speed Internet access in the United States. On Nov 16, a nonprofit group that helps kindergarten through 12th-grade schools tap federal funds to acquire and improve high-speed Internet connections announced that Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. Priscilla Chan, had agreed to donate $20 million to its work. The nonprofit group, called EducationSuperHighway, had received a gift of $3 million from Zuckerberg and Dr. Chan in 2013.

Zuckerberg, co-founder and chief executive of Facebook, supports the group’s goals as a means to his ultimate goal of spreading “personalized learning” -- the idea of using online platforms to help tailor education to the needs and interests of individual students. He and his wife are hoping to accelerate school district adoption of the telecommunications infrastructure needed to support those kind of customized digital education programs. “Mark and Priscilla believe that equipping K-12 classrooms with Internet connections is essential for students to thrive in the knowledge economy,” Jen Holleran, the executive director of Startup:Education, a nonprofit that oversees the Zuckerberg family’s educational giving, said in a statement. “Fast, reliable broadband is the foundational infrastructure that is needed to bring personalized and digital learning to every child and teacher in America."

America’s Classrooms Online: 24.5 Million Students Now Up to Speed

In 2013, more than 40 million US students could barely stream online videos. Only 30 percent of K-12 districts provided sufficient Internet access speed to support digital learning, defined by the Federal Communications Commission at 100 kbps per student. In 2015, that number has been slashed nearly in half, with 20 million more students enjoying Internet speeds that meet the FCC’s goal.

A new report, “ 2015 State of the States,” published by San Francisco (CA)-based nonprofit by EducationSuperHighway, found that 77 percent of school districts have hit the target speed. In all, an estimated 24.5 million students and 1.7 million teachers now enjoy enough broadband to make the most out of education technology tools. Researchers collected data from 6,781 public school districts across the nation, representing over 25 million students across approximately 49,000 schools.

Univision offers own stand-alone Internet streaming service

Univision Communications has jumped into the Internet streaming service market by offering its own $5.99-a-month service called Univision Now. The company joins a growing field of major networks, including HBO, CBS, Showtime, NBC, the Tennis Channel and Smithsonian Channel, in experimenting with stand-alone streaming services to enable viewers to watch programming on their cellphones, tablets and computers.

Univision's new service provides live streams of its two over-the-air broadcast TV networks -- Univision and UniMás -- but not the company's popular cable TV channels. "Our target audience is over-the-air viewers who have never subscribed to pay-TV," said Tonia O'Connor, president of content distribution for Univision. Univision recognizes that a majority of its Latino viewers watch its main broadcast networks, which are accessible for free with an antenna. Univision also did not want to undercut the efforts of its distribution partners, the pay-TV companies, which have introduced so-called TV Everywhere apps to enable customers to watch a full complement of programming on mobile devices. TV Everywhere users must certify that they subscribe to pay-TV to access the content on their phones and tablets.

Comcast launches streaming TV service that doesn’t count against data caps

Comcast's live streaming TV service, Steam TV, has launched in the Boston (MA) and Chicago (IL) areas, with plans to bring it to Comcast's entire cable territory by early 2016. When asked if Stream TV usage will count against the 300GB data plans imposed in certain parts of Comcast's territory, a Comcast spokesperson replied, "No, Stream is an IP cable service delivered over our managed network to the home." A Comcast FAQ says, "Stream TV is a cable streaming service delivered over Comcast's cable system, not over the Internet. Therefore, Stream TV data usage will not be counted towards your Xfinity Internet monthly data usage." Stream TV is intended for Comcast's Internet-only customers, offering live TV on computers, tablets, and phones. In-home streaming video is delivered as a managed service over the Comcast IP gateway in customers' homes and works similarly to cable TV -- despite not requiring a cable TV subscription or set-top box -- potentially providing greater video quality than rival streaming services.

Searching for Work in the Digital Era

The Internet is a central resource for Americans looking for work, but a notable minority lack confidence in their digital job-seeking skills. Among the key findings:

  • The Internet is a top resource for many of today’s job hunters: Among Americans who have looked for work in the last two years, 79 percent utilized online resources in their most recent job search and 34 percent say these online resources were the most important tool available to them.
  • Like many other aspects of life, job seeking is going mobile: 28 percent of Americans have used a smartphone as part of a job search, and half of these “smartphone job seekers” have used their smartphone to fill out a job application.
  • Even as digital job seeking skills have become increasingly important, a minority of Americans would find it challenging to engage in tasks such as creating a professional resume, using email to contact potential employers, or filling out a job application online.
  • Many Americans now use social media to look for and research jobs, share employment opportunities with friends, and highlight their skills to potential employers; 13 percent of social media users say their social media presence has helped them find a job.