May 2016

Department of Commerce
May 9, 2016
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/commerce_cross-border_da...

Agenda

8:30-8:40 a.m. Greeting and Overview of Roundtable: Jessica Nicholson, Economist (ESA) and Giulia McHenry, Chief Economist (NTIA)

8:40-8:55 a.m. Opening Remarks: Commerce’s Role in Supporting an Open Internet and the Free Flow of Cross-Border Data: Alan Davidson, Director of Digital Economy for the Department of Commerce (NTIA)

Opening Remarks: 21st Century Economic Measurement: Ellen Hughes-Cromwick, Chief Economist for the Department of Commerce (ESA)

8:55-9:00 a.m. Types of cross-border data flows and restrictions: Jessica Nicholson

9:00-9:10 a.m. Questions to consider when measuring cross-border data flows: Giulia McHenry

9:10-9:35 a.m. Existing Government statistics related to data flows

a. E-commerce data (5 minutes): Scott Scheleur, Assistant Division Chief, Retail & Wholesale Indicators Program (Census)
b. Trade in services data (5 minutes): Alexis Grimm, Economist, Balance of Payments Division, Methodology and Special Studies Branch (BEA)
c. USITC digital trade studies (10 minutes): Martha Lawless, Chief, Services Division, Office of Industries (USITC)

Other sources – non-government and one-off studies (5 minutes): Jessica Nicholson

9:35-10:15 a.m. BREAK-OUT DISCUSSION 1

a. What are the key questions we need to answer about the domestic macro economy? And why do we need to know?
b. What are the strengths of the currently available data?
c. Where do the currently available data fall short?

10:15-10:25 a.m. BREAK-OUT DISCUSSION 1 RECAP

10:25-10:40 a.m. BREAK

10:40-10:50 a.m. What do we know about cross-border data flows at the firm level? Giulia McHenry

10:50-11:20 a.m. BREAK-OUT DISCUSSION 2

a. What are the key questions we need to answer about firm level cross-border data flows? And why do we need to know? Areas to consider:

  1. How businesses use cross border data: inter-firm flows (transactional)
  2. How businesses use cross border data: intra-firm flows (commercial data and services)
  3. Impact of restrictions of cross-border data flows

b. What are the strengths of the currently available data?
c. Where do current data sources fall short?

11:20-11:30 a.m. BREAK-OUT DISCUSSION 2 RECAP

11:30-11:45 OVERVIEW AND DISCUSSION – Jessica Nicholson

a. What is currently available?
b. Working groups overview
c. What do we want to know?

11:45-12:00 LOOKING AHEAD - priorities, feasibility, implementation. Final comments: Giulia McHenry

12:00 ADJOURNMENT



Charter-TWC merger opposition group presses FCC for more conditions

With Commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission set to vote on Charter Communications' takeover of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks, opposition group Stop Mega Cable has made an 11th-hour plea with the agency to impose more conditions on the deals. On May 2, representatives from the group, led by legal eagles from member company Dish Network, met with Marc Paul, legal advisor for Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel. The opposition group said conditions to the deals outlined in an approval order published by FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler don't go far enough.

"Among other things, the conditions proposed in the draft order do not fully prevent Charter from using its dominant position in the marketplace to thwart competition from [over-the-top] streaming services and stifle competitors in underserved, rural communities," the group said in an ex parte filing outlining the FCC meeting. "Coalition members explained that additional conditions should be imposed to remedy the harms that remain insufficiently addressed by the draft order," the ex parte added. "Among other things, Charter should be required to offer a standalone broadband service that would enable consumers wishing to 'cut the cord' to have that option." Stop Mega Cable asked the FCC to demand that Charter establish a standalone broadband product with a minimum download speed of 60 Mbps. "In addition, members of the coalition underscored the need to establish a meaningful condition to improve media diversity that goes beyond a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). MOUs in mergers have proven to be ineffective for the most part and the MOU proffered in this merger was even lighter than most (e.g., calling for the renewal of a single African-American oriented programming service)," the group added.

Gunning for Google, Comcast Preps Gigabit Internet That Works With Regular Cable

Comcast is gearing up to offer one-gigabit-per-second Internet service in five US cities in 2016. The first five cities to see the blazing speed are Nashville (TN), Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Detroit (MI), and Miami (FL). In line with Google Fiber, Verizon FiOs, and municipal offerings at one-gigabit speeds to the home, the new Comcast service will dramatically increase download speeds. Most subscribers currently receive download speeds of 25-100 megabits per second. For the customers with a 100Mbps connection, the increase boosts their speed 10 times over.

What sets Comcast’s gigabit service apart is the fact that the Internet provider is not using fiber optic lines to achieve the mega-fast speeds. Instead the company is using the existing coaxial cable lines that are already piped into people’s homes, giving Comcast a potentially huge advantage over a project like Google Fiber—which requires digging costly trenches through cities to lay fiber cables. Comcast’s gigabit-over-coax Internet requires a new kind of cable modem. That device is charmingly classified under a new DOCSIS 3.1 standard, an acronym for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification. And while it looks like any other black box, this new standard is capable of pumping data at 10 Gbps over existing coaxial cable. Still, Comcast is ushering in its new service with only a tenth of that power—currently offering one gigabit per second downstream speeds with 35Mbps upstream

Judge opens the door to Clinton deposition in email case

Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court for the District of Columbia opened the door to interviewing Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton as part of a review into her use of a private e-mail server while secretary of State. Judge Sullivan laid out the ground rules for interviewing multiple State Department officials about the e-mails, with an eye toward finishing the depositions in the weeks before the party nominating conventions. Clinton herself may be forced to answer questions under oath, Judge Sullivan said, though she is not yet being forced to take that step.

“Based on information learned during discovery, the deposition of Mrs Clinton may be necessary,” Judge Sullivan said in an order. Discovery is the formal name for the evidence-gathering process, which includes depositions. “If plaintiff believes Mrs. Clinton’s testimony is required, it will request permission from the Court at the appropriate time.” The order leaves open the possibility that Clinton will be forced to answer detailed questions on the eve of her formal selection as the Democratic presidential nominee about her creation of the server. Any deposition would surely roil the presidential race and force her campaign to confront the issue, which has dogged her for a year.

YouTube Said to Plan ‘Unplugged’ Online TV Service for 2017

YouTube is working on a paid subscription service called Unplugged that would offer customers a bundle of cable TV channels streamed over the Internet, apparently. The project, for which YouTube has already overhauled its technical architecture, is one of the online video giant’s biggest priorities and is slated to debut apparently as soon as 2017.

YouTube executives have discussed these plans with most major media companies, including Comcast’s NBCUniversal, Viacom, Twenty-First Century Fox, and CBS, but have yet to secure any rights, apparently. YouTube, a unit of Alphabet’s main Google Internet business, is pursuing subscriptions for premium video to compliment the largest ad-supported video site in the world. YouTube introduced its first paid subscription service, Red, in the fall of 2015. Unplugged would bring more premium content onto YouTube’s web service and mobile apps, grabbing more viewing time and generating more non-advertising revenue.

Dish warns key 5G spectrum 'will be controlled almost exclusively by Verizon' if XO deal approved

Dish Network is lobbying the Federal Communications Commission to deny Verizon's proposed $1.8 billion acquisition of XO Communications' spectrum assets and fiber business, claiming among other things that the deal would have an adverse impact on competition in multiple markets. Verizon announced in February it planned to buy XO's substantial fiber-optic network, which covers 40 major US markets through 1.2 million fiber miles. The move would enable Verizon to deepen its Ethernet penetration to serve its fixed-line customers, and it may allow the carrier to cut the backhaul payments it makes to fiber providers outside its wireline markets as it densifies its cell network, partially through deploying small cells. Verizon's purchase of XO would also enable Verizon to lease XO's local multipoint distribution service (LMDS) spectrum with an option to buy it before the end of 2018. XO has 102 LMDS licenses in 28 GHz and 39 GHz bands that Verizon has said can be used to conduct 5G testing.

"The two transactions would place Verizon, one of the two largest mobile phone carriers in the nation, in control of resources -- specifically XO's fiber network and Nextlink's LMDS and 39 GHz spectrum -- that promise to play central roles in 5G applications and hence will be important to the companies competing against Verizon in the commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) 5G marketplace," Dish said in its petition. "Just as important, the transactions will eliminate current and potential competition between Verizon and XO in the mobile backhaul (both wireless and fiber), Internet transit, and enterprise and wholesale markets." Dish went on to claim that the LMDS frequencies are among the most important "next-frontier" airwaves for 5G, and licensed millimeter wave spectrum in that range "will be controlled almost exclusively by Verizon" should the acquisition go through.

Temporary antennas could speed broadcast incentive auction repack process

Dan Fallon, senior radio frequency engineer at Dielectric, says temporary antennas could be the way to go for broadcasters in order to meet the 39-month time frame allotted for channel repacking after the 600 MHz incentive auction. As the Federal Communications Commission has maxed out its initial clearing target at 126 megahertz for the upcoming 600 MHz incentive auctions, the reality of the workload ahead for broadcasters that will need to reconfigure antennas in the move to new channels is beginning to set in.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called broadcaster participation in the auction "robust," which translates to a whole lot of channel repacking to get done. Fallon said the whole process of clearing out of the 600 MHz band so wireless operators can quickly put the spectrum to use for mobile broadband could be accelerated by using temporary, side-mounted omnidirectional antennas. That will get broadcasters back on the air quickly and buy them some time to start building out the bigger structures needed to replicate previously used coverage patterns. But, the multiple phase antenna buildout process is not ideal for broadcasters since the FCC requires they apply for reimbursement from the $1.75 billion channel relocation fund before the end of the three-year repack time frame, meaning broadcasters could be left holding the bag for the more expensive permanent antenna builds and installations.