January 2017

Tom Wheeler Interview: FCC Chairman Says Rolling Back Agenda Will Be ‘Easier Said Than Done’

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler, who will depart the week of Jan 16, said that if the incoming Republican majority on the commission seeks to rollback his agenda, it will be “easier said than done.” In an interview with Variety, hours after he gave a speech at the Aspen Institute defending the FCC’s network neutrality rules, Chairman Wheeler said that moves to undo some of the actions taken in recent years will face public scrutiny. “The idea of taking things away that American consumers and American companies enjoy today is not the easiest thing in the world,” Chairman Wheeler said. “And there are processes in the Administrative Procedure Act that they have to follow in order to do this, and they have to withstand court scrutiny. That is easier said than done.”

Having come from industry, Chairman Wheeler said that as chairman he came to a realization that, in meeting with lobbying and other groups, “everyone comes in here and talks about how their self-interest is synonymous with the public interest.” He added, “And you know, I used to do the same thing. My ‘aha’ moment was that the public interest was a pretty malleable concept. The public interest is determined by the old adage, ‘Where you stand depends on where you sit.’ And so, what I have tried to do is say, ‘OK, we need another standard.’ And I kept saying to myself, ‘What is it that is in the common good, as differentiated from the public interest?’ Because the common good is how you can serve the good of the most people the best way.”

Commissioner Clyburn Statement on Small Business Exemption

Commissioner Mignon Clyburn of the Federal Communications Commission issued the following statement in response to the Commission’s failure to address the needs ofsmall broadband providers:

“Nearly two years ago, in the lead up to the Commission’s adoption of the 2015 Open Internet Order, I fought hard to ensure that our nation’s smallest broadband service providers would be free from undue burden when it comes to enhancements to the FCC’s transparency rule. It pains me to report today, that not only have those enhancements gone into effect for all providers, but the Order which would have protected small providers from this enhanced requirement, failed to get adopted by this body. This means that now, even providers with just a handful of customers, must comply with every one of the enhancements to our transparency rules. I am extremely disappointed that the Commission did not reach consensus on extending the exemption pending resolution of a rulemaking on this issue. Over a month ago, I voted to establish commonsense protections for small service providers from these enhanced requirements: the only FCC Commissioner to do so. I acted then, and still today feel, that while increased transparency is desirable, we should never abandon our duty to ensure that regulatory benefits outweigh regulatory burdens, particularly when it comes to small businesses. This ‘flash cut’ is unfair to the smallest operators, the very ones who believed that our government would protect them from undue burdens. Today, we failed as a Commission, but I am hopeful we will rectify that failure soon."

President-elect Trump Meets With FCC Commissioner Pai

President-elect Donald Trump met Jan 16 with Federal Communications Commission senior Republican commissioner Ajit Pai, according to transition and future White House spokesman Sean Spicer, who said it was the President-elect's last meeting of the day. Commissioner Pai is widely expected to be tapped as interim FCC chair when President-elect Trump becomes President Trump on Jan 20 and could be named permanent chair as well, though his fellow Republican commissioner Michael O'Rielly is also in the conversation. Trump also met with former Federal Trade Commission Republican member Joshua Wright.

FCC Seeks Comments on Terminating Certain Proceedings as Dormant

The Federal Communications Commission’s Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau released a Public Notice on January 13, 2017 seeking comment on whether certain docketed proceedings listed in the attachment to the Public Notice should be terminated as dormant. The Bureau said to the extent that a particular proceeding includes a petition addressing the merits or other pending pleadings, a party’s failure to file comments in response to this Public Notice will be construed as consent to termination of that proceeding. A party aggrieved by a docket termination may file a petition for reconsideration with the Bureau or an application for review with the full FCC. Comments are due 30 days after Federal Register publication; replies are due 45 days after Federal Register publication. (CG Docket No. 17-22)

An open letter to Trump from the US press corps

[Commentary] Dear Mr President Elect:
In these final days before your inauguration, we thought it might be helpful to clarify how we see the relationship between your administration and the American press corps. While you have every right to decide your ground rules for engaging with the press, we have some, too. It is, after all, our airtime and column inches that you are seeking to influence. We, not you, decide how best to serve our readers, listeners, and viewers. So think of what follows as a backgrounder on what to expect from us over the next four years:

Access is preferable, but not critical.
Off the record and other ground rules are ours—not yours—to set.
We decide how much airtime to give your spokespeople and surrogates.
We believe there is an objective truth, and we will hold you to that.
We’ll obsess over the details of government.
We will set higher standards for ourselves than ever before.
We’re going to work together.
We’re playing the long game.

Poll: Donald Trump is more unfair to the media than the media is to him

When President-elect Donald Trump rails against the “dishonest” media, roughly half of Americans agree with his premise — that the press treats him unfairly. But even more people think Trump is unfair to the media. Those are among the results of a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, which showed that 47 percent of Americans generally view media coverage of Trump as unfair; 49 percent say coverage is fair (plus-2) but the poll's margin of error is 3.5 points. Call it an even split. Public opinion is clearer on Trump's treatment of the media: 57 percent characterize it as unfair, and just 38 percent call it fair. That's a 19-point gap.

So why, you might ask, does Trump keep up a fight in which he looks like the more flagrant offender? It appears that his anti-media screeds do more damage to his own reputation than to his target's. The answer could have something to do with the way public opinion breaks down along demographic lines. In short, Trump's attacks on the media overwhelmingly bother people who, generally speaking, are not likely to support him, anyway. At the same time, they are red meat for his base.

AT&T's Stephenson: CNN Spinoff Doesn't Make Sense

Although AT&T and Time Warner have signaled they expect to bypass the Federal Communications Commission review of their proposed $108.7 billion merger—a review that would be triggered by the exchange of FCC licenses like those used to transmit CNN and HBO—AT&T chairman Randall Stephenson signaled a spin-off of CNN was not in the cards. "I don't know why we'd even talk about that," he said. "It doesn't seem relevant to approving a deal like this. What would be the competitive issue that you're remedying with spinning off CNN? There are not competitive issues with owning CNN." President-elect Donald Trump, who has been highly critical of CNN, has threatened to block the deal, leading some to see a spin-off as a way to ease the path to approval. But Stephenson said in the interview that he sees it as a "basic vertical merger" that will ultimately be approved.

Tech workers to protest Palantir over Immigrant Tracking

A coalition of tech workers in Silicon Valley will demonstrate outside of Palantir’s headquarters to protest the company’s assistance to the US government in creating a system to track immigrants and foreign travelers entering the country. Documents obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center showed that Palantir, based in Palo Alto (CA), could help create a system for “extreme-vetting” of immigrants and foreign travelers entering the US. The company had also reportedly played an undisclosed role in US Customs and Border Protection intelligence. “We want to make it clear that the overall tech community is watching what Palantir does,” said Jason Prado, a software engineer at Facebook and member of the Tech Workers Coalition. The Tech Workers Coalition is organizing the Palantir demonstration. “And we want to hold the tech community overall accountable for the values that we as a community have,” Prado said.

The Tech Workers Coalition has created an online campaign to support their protests, which are apart of the 120 hours of action in the Bay Area, a set of anti-Trump protests invoking Martin Luther King Jr. in the lead up to inauguration day. The Coalition has three primary demands: join other major tech companies in pledging to never create a Muslim registry, disclose steps taken to avoid government overreach and abuse and if this not possible, dismantle databases that could be abused.