Commissioner Carr Remarks on Wireless Infrastructure: Enabling the 5G Upgrade

I want to share with you a few of the reforms the [5G Upgrade Order] makes:

• First, we make sure that 60 days means 60 days. There is some confusion about when the Federal Communications Commission’s existing shot clock starts. So we clarify that when the wireless builder takes the first step that a locality requires and submits documents that show the project qualifies for expedited review, the 60-day shot clock begins. It’s a simple yet meaningful clarification.
• Next, we clarify what equipment can go on the existing structure. We reiterate that individual pieces of transmission equipment are not themselves “cabinets,” and that up to four equipment cabinets are allowed per request, not cumulatively. We also clarify how a modification can increase a tower’s height to allow 20 feet of distance between antennas.
• We then emphasize the distinction between concealment elements and other conditions of approval that relate to aesthetics. Concealment elements that cannot be defeated in a modification apply only to stealthed structures, like a wireless tower made to look like a tree or flagpole. Certain aesthetic conditions also must be upheld, but we explain that they can’t be enforced in a way that negates our other rules that promote streamlined approval.
• Finally, we seek comment on additional issues that touch on the expansion of existing sites.

The 5G Upgrade Order is informed by months of engagement with local governments and industry, including WIA and CTIA, whose FCC petitions are addressed in the order. We are grateful for your continued participation in this process as we all seek to upgrade America’s wireless networks and extend U.S. leadership in 5G.