Why the $7.2 billion Microsoft-Nokia deal is a terrible idea
[Commentary] Nokia announced that Microsoft will buy its devices business for shade over $7.15 billion in an attempt to mimic the Apple/Google strategy of owning the hardware, software and services. But Vic Gundotra, Google’s sharp-elbowed senior executive who, like Android co-creator Andy Rubin, wanted to win over Nokia and bring it into the Android camp about two years ago, put it best when he tweeted: “Two turkeys don’t make an Eagle.”
And while he might have ruffled some feathers in Microsoft and Nokia offices, his observation wasn’t that off the mark. Microsoft makes a mobile OS that the market doesn’t seem to want. Nokia smartphones sales make drying paint seem like a John Woo thriller. It doesn’t matter from which angle you look, the combination of these two companies into a single entity doesn’t add up. The money Microsoft saved in the deal is one thing, but the question that needs to be asked is: what has fundamentally changed with this deal? If you ask me, nothing really has changed.
Why the $7.2 billion Microsoft-Nokia deal is a terrible idea