Why closing the digital divide will take more than cash

Private organizations, state legislatures and the federal government are trying to address the digital divide with funding. The infrastructure bill moving through Congress promises $65 billion for broadband development, but obstacles will remain after the money is made available. One problem with converting the money into broadband access is the classic divide in government philosophy: Whether the federal government or individual states should make the decisions. A further complication with federal funding is that the FCC’s maps, which theoretically show which areas have high-speed internet access and which still need it, aren’t specific enough to be accurate. Both the ends and means of broadband technology are contentious issues; experts disagree over symmetrical speeds and the value of future-proof systems over immediate connectivity availability. Likewise, which technologies work best and for which values of “best” - whether it is satellite, fixed wireless access or fiber - is a subject that inspires strong feelings on all sides. Every form of broadband technology still runs into potential problems when it comes to setting up the equipment and infrastructure. Ultimately, improved connectivity has become a priority and state, local and federal governments are taking steps to make sure everyone has access to high-speed internet. Yet between intention and the execution, these logistic issues remain unsolved.

[Isabel Kunkle is editor of WISPA, CTAM and Wireless SmartBriefs.]