Why Helping the Poor Pay for Broadband Is Good for Us All
[Commentary] The suggested Lifeline program updates would allow low-income households to use the same subsidy to help cover the cost of broadband -- meaning more families could afford Internet at home.The catch? The subsidy is just $9.25 per month. The proposal shows that federal regulators are finally beginning to acknowledge what many of us already know -- the Internet is a crucial gateway to economic opportunity. But broadband tends to be costly, even with discounted plans. Will such a seeming pittance be enough to make broadband affordable for families strapped for cash?
Advocates for bridging the so-called digital divide, it turns out, say it might be. Not only that, they say that expanding the Lifeline program to broadband could open up a whole new competitive marketplace for low-cost Internet access. Non-profits working to expand broadband adoption hope that if Chairman Wheeler’s proposal is approved, the FCC itself could encourage more providers to offer a subsidized rate to qualified low-income families, encouraging more competition with the current plans. Some say the government could even pay subsidies directly to broadband providers to get a better deal than low-income families could get on their own. “We’re building a nation of more consumers for broadband,” says Angela Siefer, the executive director of the National Digital Inclusion Allilance. “We’re actually creating new customers for them.”
Why Helping the Poor Pay for Broadband Is Good for Us All