Why We Still Need A Lifeline: Ensuring Phone Access for Low- Income Families in the US

[Commentary] The need and expense of basic social service programs has been subject of national debate. On Capitol Hill, the costs and benefits of such services are described in terms of dollars and cents. The Universal Service Fund (USF) is no exception from scrutiny and it is the position of Public Knowledge that cuts to our communications service safety net, is a mistake that would harm millions of Americans.

Our telephone system is one of that has made America great. Its reliability has fostered innovation and growth as well as provided an essential public safety net. As mandated by the 1996 Telecommunications Act, the FCC is required to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable communication services. Unlike other federal safety net programs USF is subsidized by carriers, not through federal taxes, and provides millions of Americans with critical services they might have not otherwise had access to. The Lifeline program has undergone significant reforms according to Clyburn. Strides have been taken within the Commission to investigate claims of fraud and abuse, reform the eligibility confirmation process and improve the overall education about the Lifeline program. Clyburn reported over $200 million was saved last year as a result of these reforms, with an additional $400 million projected savings over the next. As the technology advances, the conversations will only become more complicated, and the scrutiny will continue. I applaud policy makers like Commissioner Clyburn who, despite the current political climate- remain committed to protecting a vital lifeline for so many Americans.