Thursday, January 18, 2024
Headlines Daily Digest
Today: Industry Listening Session on Kids’ Online Safety
Don't Miss:
Playing Politics with the Poor: The Affordable Connectivity Program
Broadband Funding
Broadband Service
State/Local/Tribal
Broadband Costs
Incarcerated Individuals
Privacy
Platforms
Consumer Protections
Net Neutrality
Emergency Communications
AI
Ownership
Devices
Policymakers
Company News
Stories From Abroad
Broadband Funding
Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel informed Congress that without an additional $6 billion in funding for the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), the program will run out of funds by mid-2024. The program, created with over $14 billion, is less than 2 years old. Another $6 billion will keep the program going only until the end of 2024, and then they will go through this same sky-is-falling exercise all over again. At current levels, the ACP has grown larger than all other FCC Universal Service Fund (USF) programs combined. The USF programs are decades old and ensure all Americans, regardless of where they live or their level of income, have access to telecommunications and information services. They include funding for rural areas, schools, libraries, rural healthcare facilities, as well as funding for the hearing-impaired. Here's a practical solution to this issue: Replace ACP with a new Lifeline program that increases eligibility to 150% of the federal poverty line, increases the Lifeline subsidy from $9.25 per month to $30 per month for those at or below the poverty line and $20 per month for those at or below 150% of the poverty line, and restricts eligibility to residential fixed broadband and eliminates subsidies for mobile services. These changes would direct funding to those who need it most for the services most in need of support.
'It's going to be a mess': Federal Communications Commission begins wind down of monthly $30 subsidy for internet bills
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has begun winding down a program that helps low-income people pay for internet service, which would affect 67,548 subscribers in Allegheny County alone. FCC officials said most of the funding for the Affordable Connectivity Program will run out by the end of April without additional appropriations from Congress. Enrollment in the program, which has nearly 23 million beneficiaries nationwide, is scheduled to close February 7, 2024. “It’s going to be a mess to notify all these people,” said Dave Sevick, executive director of Computer Reach, a Homewood nonprofit that refurbishes laptops for distribution to needy families. “It’s really a sad story of hurting people who are low income.”
In December 2023, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued fines for two internet service providers that the FCC says defaulted on Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) obligations. RDOF was the FCC subsidy program where broadband subsidies were awarded by a reverse auction that ended in December 2020. The first fine was to Etheric Communications for $732,000 for 244 locations. Etheric was one of the largest RDOF winners, having won $248.6 million to cover 64,463 locations. The FCC said that Etheric had failed to become designated as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) for the affected passings. A much larger fine of $21.7 million was levied again GigFire (or LTD Broadband) for defaulting on 7,238 locations. Apparently, LTD Broadband has rebranded as GigFire, and the FCC levied the fine against both entities since it seemed uncertain of the relationship between LTD Broadband and GigFire. I think the FCC is using these fines to issue a firm warning to any other RDOF winners who might be considering default.
Key data about internet performance in countries across the world. This quarter we’ve provided updated analyses for 52 markets using Speedtest Intelligence. In the US, T-Mobile was the fastest mobile operator with median download and upload speeds of 188.96 Mbps and 12.19 Mbps, respectively. T-Mobile also recorded the highest mobile Consistency at 87.3%, and the lowest median mobile latency of 50 ms. T-Mobile also led the market with the fastest median 5G download speed at 238.87 Mbps, as well as the lowest 5G latency of 48 ms. T-Mobile secured the highest Video Score across all technologies with 78.21, and for 5G, with a Video Score of 81.54. Cox led the market as the fastest fixed broadband provider with a median download speed of 261.27 Mbps, while AT&T Internet recorded the fastest median fixed upload speed of 195.64 Mbps, and Verizon had the lowest median latency over fixed broadband at 15 ms.
When you own a website or online business and rely on it being available to customers 24/7, even the shortest amount of downtime can be bad for business. That's extra true for Big Tech companies with huge amounts of customers. For them, just a single minute without internet service can mean millions of dollars lost. Amazon’s massive revenue would make it the biggest loser in an outage scenario no matter how long it might last. That’s the price of massive success, as the only place to go is (typically) down. Alphabet/Google and Meta/Facebook would also face losing hundreds of thousands of dollars per minute, which shoots up to multi-millions per hour. A single day of no web access would put Amazon alone back by 1.4 billion (with a B) dollars.
The State of New Mexico recognizes the transformative power of technology in fostering an inclusive and prosperous society for all of New Mexico’s diverse and unique communities and across New Mexico’s rich tapestry of cultures and languages as well as its diverse geographies. With this in mind, the New Mexico Office of Broadband Access and Expansion (OBAE) released its draft State Digital Equity Plan for public comment in late 2023. The plan is open for viewing and feedback until January 21, 2024. The State of New Mexico envisions a future in which all residents, families, and communities have equal access to and meaningful use of digital tools, technologies, and information, regardless of their background, income, location, or abilities. This vision aims to bridge the digital divide, ensure inclusive participation in the digital age, and promote social and economic well-being for all residents.
Doubling Down on Digital Equity in Tribal Communities: Introducing Two New Projects from the Tribal Resource Center
Michelson will continue growing its Digital Equity in Tribal Communities project by supporting the Tribal Resource Center (TRC), a Native American-led non-profit initiative under People-Centered Internet that is dedicated to offering trustworthy guidance for tribal communities seeking greater access to broadband. Digital inequity is especially apparent on tribal lands in California, with over a quarter of households lacking broadband service at 100 Megabit per second speeds. Through two new projects, Michelson will further TRC’s efforts to provide the resources necessary to ensure successful connectivity projects while acknowledging, reviving, and strengthening Native American communities through broadband.
- Tribal Community Forum and Community of Practice: This year, we will expand TRC’s capacity to manage the Tribal Community Forum, build out its content, and continue to further the conversations coming out of the Tribal Broadband Bootcamps
- Tribal Public-Private Partnerships Resources: TRC will work to enhance capacity building within Tribal communities as they enter the implementation phase of their Middle Mile and Last Mile projects
On the Hopi Reservation’s more than 1.5 million acres of desert landscape in northeast Arizona, most residents live in villages atop arid mesas. Below ground, there’s a network of copper wires that provides telephone and internet service. In 2004, Hopi Telecommunications bought the company that had installed them, but has been struggling ever since to upgrade the network to broadband speeds. Hopi Telecommunications serves both the Hopi reservation and parts of the surrounding Navajo Nation. Native nations historically have lagged in access to high-speed internet, because of the cost and incomplete broadband coverage data, among other barriers. The inequity became even more apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic, when broadband internet service was a crucial lifeline for people stuck in their homes. So, some Native nations such as the Hopi are taking the matter into their own hands by building their own networks to provide high-speed internet.
Massachusetts’ is looking at the bigger picture, not just network rollouts. Although Massachusetts already has around 99 percent broadband coverage (based on statistics from the Federal Communications Commission’s national broadband map), there’s still an adoption gap. So, Massachusetts is trying to look at broadband “holistically,” infrastructure as well as “all the other elements that are needed” to make sure people “can really take advantage of the access to the service.” In November 2023, the Massachusetts Broadband Institute launched the Gap Networks Grant Program, a new $145 million grant program funded by the Capital Projects Fund (CPF). According to FCC data, Massachusetts has approximately 15,000 unserved and underserved locations remaining. This program intends to fill that “gap,” so to speak.
Broadband Costs
Altice USA Sets Huge Broadband Price Cuts: 36 Percent Off on 300 Megabits per second Fiber-to-the-Home
After years of operational cuts and consumer price increases, Altice USA, under the direction of recently appointed CEO Dennis Mathew, has instituted fairly massive price decreases across its fiber-to-the-home and cable broadband product lines. According to Analyst Craig Moffett, the cable operator, which touts around 4.6 million broadband customers, is trying to undo the aftereffects of the “Altice Way,” the strategy of increasing EBITDA through cost cuts and price increases, which proliferated amid the aggressive expansion set forth by French-Israeli cable titan Patrick Drahi a decade ago. “For the past few years, Altice has been undoing the damage caused by overzealous cost-cutting, adding back much-needed capabilities that were lost in the initial Altice bloodletting,” he added. “What they hadn't done — until now — was undo the damage done by the overzealous price increases that followed.”
Video calls offer an opportunity for families to maintain and strengthen their ties to each other while under the great strain of separation imposed by incarceration. A 2015 study of state prison visits found that the majority of people in prison are held 100 miles away from their homes. Given this reality, along with the connection between poverty and incarceration, it’s no surprise that families of incarcerated people are often unable to afford transportation to visit their loved ones in person. Video conferencing can provide an option for people who live far away from their incarcerated loved ones and cannot visit them frequently, as well as for those who might not feel comfortable going through prison and jail security searches that are often difficult or degrading.
San Francisco (CA) has offered jail tablets and their content at no cost to incarcerated people, part of a wave of institutions starting to decouple carceral communications from a profit motive. The free tablet program was introduced in May of 2023, a logical follow-up to San Francisco making jail phone calls free in 2020, the first county in the country to do so and the second city after New York. Before 2023, the San Francisco jails had never implemented any tablet program for all inmates. When the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department decided to dip its toes into providing the devices, Michelle Lau, the acting director of the Financial Justice Project within the San Francisco treasurer’s office, recalls that the very first iteration of the bid request was similar to others across the country—riddled with charges for tablet services. Tablets have been trickling into prisons and jails over the past several years, with the devices first launched in 2012 by prison communications company JPay, now owned by prison telecom giant Securus. Soon prisons and jails began hailing “free” tablets for their inmates, as these companies would indeed often distribute tablets to inmates at no cost. But once incarcerated people actually used the tablets, they were far from free.
The overall scope of data sharing and targeted advertising that occurs on Facebook is immense. No one should be shocked to see ads for items they previously searched for, or to be asked if their data can be shared with an unknown number of “partners.” But what is the scale of this surveillance? Judging from data collected by Facebook and newly described in this unique study, it’s massive, and examining the data may leave you with more questions than answers. Using a panel of 709 volunteers who shared archives of their Facebook data, Consumer Reports found that a total of 186,892 companies sent data about them to the social network. On average, each participant in the study had their data sent to Facebook by 2,230 companies. That number varied significantly, with some panelists’ data listing over 7,000 companies providing their data. The Markup helped Consumer Reports recruit participants for the study. Participants downloaded an archive of the previous three years of their data from their Facebook settings, then provided it to Consumer Reports. By collecting data this way, the study was able to examine a form of tracking that is normally hidden: so-called server-to-server tracking, in which personal data goes from a company’s servers to Meta’s servers. Another form of tracking, in which Meta tracking pixels are placed on company websites, is visible to users’ browsers. Because the data came from a self-selected group of users, and because the results were not demographically adjusted, the study does not “make any claims about how representative this sample is of the U.S. population as a whole,” Consumer Reports says. Participants were also likely more privacy-conscious and technically inclined than typical users and more likely to be members of Consumers Reports.
Apple's new App Store payment policies are stirring outrage among software developers who say the iPhone maker is skirting the intention of a court ruling. Apple will require developers to pay it a 27% commission if they use an alternative payment method, much like the company did in the Netherlands and South Korea in response to legal rulings over related issues in those countries. With this change, Apple is effectively saying “we refuse to back down,” said Fiona Scott Morton, a former antitrust official in the Obama administration. “It’s a clear statement by Apple that they intend to fight.” Epic’s chief executive, Tim Sweeney, said on X that his company will contest Apple’s new policies in the Northern California District Court.
Policymakers
FCC Announces the Membership and First Meeting of the Re-Chartered Precision Agriculture Connectivity Task Force
Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, in consultation with Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, has appointed members to serve on the re-chartered Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States. The Task Force will hold the first meeting of its third and final term on Wednesday, January 31, 2024. Chairwoman Rosenworcel has designated Michael Adelaine, Ph.D., CIO Emeritus & Special Advisor to the President, South Dakota State University, to serve as Chair of the Task Force. Chairwoman Rosenworcel has designated two Vice Chairs: Dr. Sreekala Bajwa, Vice President, Dean & Director, Montana State University College of Agriculture & Montana Agricultural Experiment Station; and Ryan Krogh, Global Product Family Business Manager - Combines & FEE, John Deere. The complete list of members at the link below
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2023. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2023