Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Headlines Daily Digest
(Dis)Connecting the Digital City
Don't Miss:
Subsidizing Toyotas or Ferraris?
Join the Conversation on Broadband for America’s Future: A Vision for the 2020s
Broadband
Spectrum/Wireless
Content
Journalism
Privacy
Health
Trade
Company News
Stories From Abroad
Broadband
Among smart city enthusiasts, digital inclusion — the idea that nobody in the city should be deprived of digital technologies — is an oft-repeated social objective. Despite lofty commitments, the smart city is still a work-in-progress and its record in fostering social inclusion and diversity has been dismal so far. If technological interventions are as apt to deepen divides as redress them, why do proponents insist on the smart city’s promise of lessening urban inequalities? Rather than trying to ascertain whether these concerns for digital inclusion are a rhetorical flourish or a genuine attempt at a do-over in delivering equity, my work takes smart city enthusiasts’ recognition of inequality as an object of research. I examine how actors at the core of the smart city — public officials, tech companies, and local entrepreneurs — attempt to rectify perennial urban divides via smart technologies, and how those who are the target of such interventions respond. For the last five years, I have been studying Kansas City’s digital transition toward becoming “the most connected city” in the world, a journey that started off with becoming the first place to receive Google Fiber back in 2011 and continued with a smart city pilot that was launched in 2015 in collaboration with Cisco, Sprint, Think Big, and Smart City Media. Between 2015 and 2018, I lived in Kansas City, Missouri, to observe how this pilot was designed, implemented, and evaluated. I also interviewed 110 people about their experiences of living in a place whose future seemingly relied on digital infrastructures.
[Burcu Baykurt is an assistant professor of urban futures and communication at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Baykurt is the 2019 recipient of the Charles Benton Early Career Scholar Award presented by the Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC).]
Frontier Communications, the provider of telecom services in 29 states, is asking creditors to help craft a turnaround deal that includes filing for bankruptcy by the middle of March. Company executives including Bernie Han, Frontier’s new chief executive officer, met with creditors and advisers and told them the company wants to negotiate a pre-packaged agreement before $356 million of debt payments come due March 15. Frontier has been in talks with advisers about possible solutions to its $17.5 billion debt load, which has become a heavy burden as people stop using landlines.
A Frontier bankruptcy would rank as one of the biggest telecom reorganizations since Worldcom in 2002.
The problem with using speed alone in assessing the capabilities of broadband networks is that it represents only one product characteristic, and is not necessarily linked with the requirements of the applications commonly used by end consumers. While there has been an explosion in the quantity of data consumed since 2010, most of this relates to applications that run quite satisfactorily on connections with download speeds of 25Mbps — mostly web browsing and video and audio streaming — which incidentally were all available ten years ago when the broadband standard was increased to 4/1. One way of thinking about the problem is to substitute something else fast into the example and evaluate the analogy. Let’s think about cars. A Toyota Corolla is quite capable of meeting nearly all the transport needs of the average consumer. A Ferrari is certainly capable of travelling faster, but is significantly more expensive. It may get someone from A to B in record time, but if most of the trips made are very short, or not many trips are made in the first place, then the time savings of upgrading from a Corolla to a Ferrari may be negligible (indeed, it is nearly impossible for a human eye to detect the change in page load time from upgrading a connection serving an HTML web application much above 10Mbps). In this view, the modest changes to the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund appear much better targeted by reallocating resources from the Ferrari end of the spectrum towards the Corolla one. Hence, 6 million premises stand to benefit from the revised plan rather than 4 million.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2019. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3049
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2019