Tuesday, December 18, 2018
Headlines Daily Digest
CenturyLink blocked its customers’ Internet access in order to show an ad
Don't Miss:
T-Mobile Takeover of Sprint Clears US National Security Panel
Broadband/Internet
Wireless
Content/Platforms
Television
Health
Elections
- 'It's time for significant changes': civil rights groups call for Facebook leaders to step down | Guardian, The
- NAACP leads #LogOutFacebook Protest, Returns Donation from Facebook in Response to Data Breaches Targeting People of Color | National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Security
Opinion: Microsoft adopting Chromium as Web rendering engine puts the Web in a perilous place | Ars Technica
Huawei’s New Playbook in Washington: Drop PR and Hire Lawyers | Wall Street Journal
Philanthropy
Stories From Abroad
Broadband/Internet
CenturyLink briefly disabled the Internet connections of customers in UT recently and allowed them back online only after they acknowledged an offer to purchase filtering software. CenturyLink falsely claimed that it was required to do so by a UT state law that says Internet service providers (ISPs) must notify customers "of the ability to block material harmful to minors." In fact, the new law requires only that ISPs notify customers of their filtering software options "in a conspicuous manner"; it does not say that the ISPs must disable Internet access until consumers acknowledge the notification. The law even says that ISPs may make the notification "with a consumer's bill," which shouldn't disable anyone's Internet access.
Portland (OR) residents enjoy some of the nation’s fastest Internet speeds, but newly released Census data shows rural parts of the state continue to lag way behind. In some communities, fewer than half of the homes have fast Internet service. “With the rural markets the state doesn’t do well – or as well,” said Joe Franell, chief executive of Eastern Oregon Telecom, a small Hermiston company serving residents and businesses in seven communities. Overall, the Census found 87 percent of Oregon households were broadband subscribers in 2017. That’s up from 78 percent just five years earlier, and above the national figure of 84 percent. The Census finds up to 98 percent of homes in Portland have broadband access in some areas. It’s quite a different story in some parts of east Multnomah County, where as many as 25 percent of households have no Internet access at all. The divide is even greater in rural communities such as Lake, Jefferson -- and also parts of Clackamas County -- where broadband penetration hovers around 50 percent.
Apparently, T-Mobile won approval from US national-security officials for its planned takeover of Sprint, bringing the two rivals a step closer to closing their roughly $26 billion combination. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, or Cfius, told the companies that it had cleared the union of the No 3 and No 4 carriers by subscribers after several months of negotiations with company representatives. The interagency committee, which is led by the Treasury Department, reviews foreign deals for potential national security issues and can recommend the president block transactions if such concerns aren’t resolved.
In this paper, we draw upon a nascent but fast-growing empirical economics literature on the earnings effect of labor market concentration to estimate how the Sprint–T-Mobile merger would affect earnings of workers at the US stores that sell the wireless services of the merging firms and their competitors. We find that the merger would reduce earnings in the affected labor markets. Specifically, in the 50 most affected labor markets, we predict that weekly earnings will decline by $63 on average (across markets) using the specification with the largest magnitude, and $10 on average using the smallest-magnitude specification. These weekly earnings declines correspond to annual earnings declines of as high as $3,276 (or $520 under the smallest-magnitude specification).
Content/Platforms
Fewer than 3 in 10 Americans Agree the US Government Should Prohibit Political Bias in Online Services
Only 29 percent of Americans agree the US government should prohibit political bias in online services such as Facebook and Google, according to a new survey from the Center for Data Innovation. Moreover, public support for a government prohibition of political bias online drops even further when respondents consider the potential impact of such rules. Only 21 percent agree the US government should prohibit political bias online if it would create a worse user experience—and that drops to just 19 percent if it would limit free speech. There are some differences in these opinions based on political ideology: 41 percent of conservatives agree the US government should regulate political bias in online services, compared to 24 percent of liberals. However, support drops among both groups when respondents are asked whether they would support regulating online services if it would limit free speech: Only 27 percent of conservatives and 16 percent of liberals agree.
Television
Sen Markey Leads Colleagues in Renewed Defense of Strong Children’s Educational Television Programming Rules
Sen Ed Markey (D-MA), author of the Children’s Television Act, led eight of this colleagues in calling on the Federal Communications Commission to maintain essential elements of the “Kid Vid” rules, which ensure access to children’s education programming on over-the-air broadcast television, in accordance with the Children’s Television Act. In the letter, the Sens highlight the need to preserve existing rules requiring broadcasters to air three hours of regularly scheduled educational children’s programming a week on their primary stations. “In light of comments recently filed in response to this proposal, we write to encourage you to ensure that all children, regardless of their families’ income level or access to high speed internet, continue to have access to the educational programming they deserve,” write the Sens. “In particular, we urge you to preserve existing rules requiring broadcasters to air three hours of regularly scheduled educational children’s programming a week on their primary stations.” Also signing the letter are Sens Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Gary C. Peters (D-MI), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Dear Chairman Pai,
Our organization, the Berkshire Democratic Brigades, is strongly opposed to the rule change under consideration which would, in effect, virtually eliminate the franchise fees to which municipalities are entitled under the provisions of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. As you know, the income stream derived from these fees is the very lifeblood of community television. We believe that there is no justification for abandoning a rule that has done so much good for so many people. The only conceivable beneficiary of the proposed rule change would be the cable industry and its bottom line. We believe that the Federal Communications Commission should not be acting as handmaiden to the broadcast and cable industry. Quite the opposite; we would argue that the FCC must rein in the demands of the commercial interests it oversees when those demands conflict with the public good. The FCC has a responsibility, indeed a mandate, to regulate industry in the public interest. The Commission is failing in its duty if it allows the cable companies, through their use of a corporate accounting shell game, to deny community television the funding it depends on for its continued existence and health.
[Sheila Irvin is the chair of the Berkshire (MA) Democratic Brigades]
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Foundation 2018. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Foundation
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3049
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Foundation All Rights Reserved © 2018