Monday, December 6, 2021
Headlines Daily Digest
Inside the scramble to fix Biden’s plan for the future of the internet
Don't Miss:
There's $2 billion for Broadband on Reservations. It Won't Be Enough
Open Internet
Digital Inclusion
Education
Health
Universal Service Fund
Legislation
Competition
Wireless
Security/Privacy
Platforms/Social Media
TV
Lobbying
Government & Communications
Company News
How We Live Now
Open Internet
The White House is set to announce plans for its much-anticipated Alliance for the Future of the Internet, a bid to rally a coalition of democracies around a vision for an open and free web. But behind the scenes, digital rights advocates, foreign governments, and even other US officials have scrambled to push the White House to rethink its initial plans, leaving the fine points of the proposal in flux with days to go before the big reveal. alliance was originally conceived as a group of “like-minded countries” making a set of specific commitments to “promote a new and better vision of an open, trusted, and secure internet.” That includes commitments in areas related to cybersecurity, privacy and data transfers, among other things. The initial proposal raised alarm bells with civil society groups and other US government agencies alike. They argued it was sidelining existing forums dedicated to internet freedom and was being rushed out without thorough vetting from government agencies and civil society, leading to policy suggestions that risked undermining the alliance’s own goals.
The administration began disbursing $2 billion in funds extending broadband access to reservations and tribal lands, part of the recent $1.3 trillion infrastructure law. But that’s far short of the need. So far, 280 tribes have submitted requests totaling $5 billion for Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program funds. The lack of internet access across tribal lands goes beyond money. The neglect and exclusion of Native peoples goes back generations. To this day, tribal lands have comparatively low access to food, clean water, and electricity. Broadband connectivity is just one of many disparities. Matthew Rantanen, director of technology for the Southern California Tribal Chairman's Association, a coalition of 24 federally recognized tribes outside San Diego, estimates closing the digital divide for Native peoples will cost close to $8 billion.
Education
Addressing The Digital Divide In Education: Technology And Internet Access For Students In Underserved Communities
Although there are many technological solutions that can positively impact the educational digital divide, the following three are particularly noteworthy.
- Universal Connectivity/Enhancing Connectivity: Currently, the biggest barrier impacting access to education is connectivity. Nearly all policy recommendations that address the digital divide focus on increasing connectivity as the top priority. Inequitable access to electronic devices and reliable, high-speed internet connections has a negative impact on opportunity, achievement and equity gaps in education. Many argue that high-speed broadband should now be considered basic community infrastructure, given that access is so crucial to nearly all aspects of modern life. Programs that address internet access imbalances — including universal community-based Wi-Fi and those developed through the Wireless Reach Initiative — can improve educational opportunities and ensure that all students are prepared to succeed.
- Flexible Educational Platforms: During the pandemic, almost every school began working with a digital platform to deliver content, communicate with students and parents and provide instruction. But as with any other technological solution, the features and benefits vary between platforms, with some offering more flexibility than others. Options are available that provide offline access to content or allow content to be downloaded or stored. However, although these platforms can help improve access to certain materials, they still do not address the underlying problem of no internet access — and thus, do not benefit students who must be homeschooled during a pandemic.
- Working With Families 1:1: For communities where universal Wi-Fi isn't an option, they may want to consider upgrading public access through facilities such as libraries and community centers. The community can also work with a variety of businesses and organizations to assist them with overcoming the challenges with technology access, such as the Closing The Gap Foundation. By identifying the resources that are needed, the community can work together to address the needs and narrow the educational digital divide.
[Thomas McElroy is CEO and Founder of Level-1 Global Solutions]
We need to shift the narrative around digital equity. Top of mind for many participants were the very ways we talk about and define digital equity—and how it shapes and sustains the larger systemic challenges we see play out in school systems. Inequitable funding formulas, digital redlining, and biased, eurocentric curriculum, for example, all contribute incrementally to inequitable educational experiences. To add digital technological tools into the mix, particularly when they don’t account for existing inequities, often serves to maintain these challenges. We must engage the whole learning ecosystem—not only students—when it comes to digital equity. Facilitating this narrative shift will require intentional practices at all levels. The learning ecosystem refers to everyone involved in a student’s education, from families to district leaders to policymakers. Often when we think of digital equity, we think solely of students. We tend to overlook both the role that adults, such as parents, families, and teachers, play in students’ digital learning and the ways in which they interact with each other. As our participants pointed out, the structures set up to help families engage with their student’s teachers and understand the ways technology is used in the classroom has everything to do with how invested those families may be in digital learning.
Health
Medicare Beneficiaries’ Use of Telehealth in 2020: Trends by Beneficiary Characteristics and Location
This research report examines changes in Medicare fee-for-service Part B visits and use of telehealth in 2020 during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) by beneficiary characteristics, provider specialty, and location. The analysis found that Medicare in-person visits dropped while telehealth visits increased significantly at the start of the pandemic. Subsequently, telehealth visits declined before plateauing by the end of 2020. Visits to behavioral health specialists showed the largest increase in telehealth. Most telehealth visits were from the beneficiary's home. Disparities in telehealth were found by race/ethnicity, rural location, and geographic region.
The share of Medicare visits conducted through telehealth in 2020 increased 63-fold, from approximately 840,000 in 2019 to 52.7 million. States with the highest use of telehealth in 2020 included Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island, New Hampshire and Connecticut. States with the lowest use of telehealth in 2020 included Tennessee, Nebraska, Kansas, North Dakota and Wyoming. The report also found insightful trends on the kinds of services Medicare beneficiaries sought through telehealth. While overall health care visits for Medicare beneficiaries declined in 2020 as compared to 2019, telehealth was particularly helpful in offsetting potential foregone behavioral health care. In 2020, telehealth visits comprised a third of total visits to behavioral health specialists, compared to 8 percent of visits to primary care providers and 3 percent of visits to other specialists.
Legislation
ITI Offers Recommendations to Close Digital Divide, Strengthen U.S. Broadband in Infrastructure Law Implementation
In this letter to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Acting Administrator Evelyn Remaley, ITI called for specific actions to support efforts to close the digital divide and strengthen US broadband infrastructure across all communities:
- Give states and territories the flexibility to incorporate any combination of technology that can meet the performance requirements that the IIJA and NTIA regulations specify. Whether building out to unserved or underserved communities, or bridging needed middle mile connections, NTIA should make clear that a range of innovative technologies can be included in applications for grants funding commercial ICT options. This flexibility should also facilitate projects for states seeking to demonstrate new use cases and innovative solutions to connect individuals and small businesses from across the country to the digital economy.
- NTIA should work closely with industry and consumer advocates throughout the process of crafting the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) and meeting other procedural benchmarks in order to facilitate a timely and effective flow of funding. While current supply chain challenges may have a practical bearing on the speed with which funded networks can be deployed, Americans in all areas of the country are eagerly awaiting the promise of better access through projects funded under the Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment Program. We encourage NTIA to establish timely interim benchmarks geared toward distribution of funding to awardees as soon as practicable.
- Ensure that broadband projects can easily incorporate and benefit from commercial information and communications technologies (ICT). Due to domestic content requirements in the law, projects could face unnecessary delays and be unable to access best-in-class, global technology. ITI is strongly urging Congress to take legislative action and the Commerce Department to ensure this shortcoming is addressed to that the infrastructure funding can be distributed to eligible entities as effectively and efficiently as possible, with the widest possible benefits fully realized.
- Consult with industry and federal stakeholders, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) as the Notice of Funding Opportunity is drafted. Along with historic investments in buildout, the IIJA is also facilitating significant investments in security that could be coupled with state broadband plans to ensure that newly deployed networks are also protected against attacks. We expect that States will simultaneously be developing broadband and digital inclusion plans alongside cybersecurity plans as they also compete for security and resiliency funding from other federal agencies pursuant to the IIJA.
- Ensure use of Digital Equity Capacity Grants funding can occur alongside deployment plans and further prioritize state plans that fund digital literacy efforts and support access to connected devices. Digital Equity Capacity Grants are critical for ensuring all Americans, and especially vulnerable populations such as low-income families and seniors, have the means, skills, and devices necessary to securely access broadband services. We urge NTIA to meet the statutory deadline for issuing the NOFO within 180 days so that planning for the use of this funding can occur alongside deployment plans.
California is well positioned to benefit from broadband access funds included in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. That’s the message state leaders and experts conveyed “Federal Infrastructure Funds for California: Broadband and Beyond,” hosted by California Foward and the California Emerging Technology Fund (CETF), and co-sponsored by more than 40 organizations. “California is a little bit ahead of the game because of how long we’ve been at this,” said Sen Alex Padilla (D-CA). He added that the state is not starting from scratch in terms of state-level investment and commitment to broadband infrastructure. “We know with increasing precision where the underserved areas of the state remain and what the ballpark costs are to connect people.” According to the California Public Utilities Commission, the state has more underserved households than any other state with more than 50% of rural households, nearly 30% of tribal households and nearly 50% of urban households lacking any broadband service at 100 Mbps (modern benchmark speed).
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society’s Joanne Hovis emphasized that the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is a very big deal because of the scale of funding and the fact that it is a bipartisan effort. “The great majority of the funding that is targeted for broadband in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and also in the American Rescue Plan Act is flowing through state government and that, in my view, is a very good thing and I think it’s particularly good for California.” She added, “I really do think that all of the thinking, the planning, the rigorous analysis, and the effort of the past decade or more that you have undertaken position you now for this moment.”
The Federal Trade Commission has hit back against the US Chamber of Commerce, denying 35 of the 37 public records requests filed by the lobbying group about the FTC’s voting rules, policy statements and plans to fine businesses who break the law. The Chamber had come out swinging before Thanksgiving, accusing the agency of “going rogue” with its actions. The FTC argued in its previously unreported denial that the volume of requests creates an “unreasonable hardship for the agency to process.” For two other requests — including on the FTC voting procedures — the agency said documents are already public. The Chamber is still deciding how to respond to the FTC’s denial. “The agency’s denial of our [requests]in less than 48 hours calls into question whether the FTC ever actually reviewed each submission,” said spokesperson Tim Doyle. Under the law, the group has 90 days to either file an appeal with the agency or sue. (The National Archives also has a program to help mediate disputes related to the requests.) In the meantime, the Chamber submitted three new records requests seeking the FTC’s full internal procedures manual and records related to former FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra’s votes.
A group of senators, led by Sen Jerry Moran (R-KS), are proposing to ban votes by departed FTC commissioners. The bill would be retroactive to the beginning of 2021, nullifying any remaining Chopra votes. More than two dozen leaders of conservative-leaning groups wrote to lawmakers and the FTC’s inspector general, calling for “an investigation into both this practice and the Commission’s lack of transparency.”
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021