Daily Digest 2/28/2025 (News From the FCC)

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Friday, February 28, 2025

Headlines Daily Digest

CORRECTION: On February 26, Headlines passed on an error in telecompetitor, which reported that Missouri's BEAD Program Round 1 applicants requested almost $4 million in broadband support. Carl Sagan contacted us to say the correct amount is, in fact, $4 billion. We regret the error.


Don't Miss:

FCC Looks to Bring More Spectrum to Marketplace and Fund National Security

Benton Foundation Broadband Priorities of New House Communications Subcommittee Democrats

BEAD Program Targeting: A preliminary analysis

Table of Contents

News From the FCC

FCC Looks to Bring More Spectrum to Marketplace and Fund National Security  |  Read below  |  Press Release  |  Federal Communications Commission
FCC to Explore Further Opportunities in the Upper C-band  |  Federal Communications Commission
FCC Improves Wireless Emergency Alerts by Enabling Silent Alerts  |  Federal Communications Commission
FCC Expands Use of Tool to Block Fake 'Government' Robocallers  |  Federal Communications Commission
FCC Commissioner Gomez on First Open Meeting Agenda  |  Federal Communications Commission

Broadband Funding

BEAD Program Targeting: A preliminary analysis  |  Read below  |  Hernan Galperin, François Bar  |  Research  |  USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism
Delaying the 5G Fund?  |  Read below  |  Doug Dawson  |  Analysis  |  CCG Consulting

Digital Inclusion

Digital Inclusion Bytes: Digital Skills – Using frameworks and skill lists  |  Read below  |  Nate Stone  |  Analysis  |  National Digital Inclusion Alliance
For Southeast Ohio’s Digital Navigator, Every Day is a Good Day  |  Read below  |  Kristi Zappie-Ferradino  |  National Digital Inclusion Alliance

Local Initiatives

Internet is slow on Beaver Island, Michigan, but a rural grant could help  |  Read below  |  Sheri McWhirter  |  MLive

Policymakers

 

 
Benton Foundation Broadband Priorities of New House Communications Subcommittee Democrats  |  Read below  |  Zoë Walker  |  Analysis  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Security

The surveillance tech waiting for workers as they return to the office  |  Ars Technica
Lawmakers open investigation into DOGE access to national security information  |  US Senate

Artificial Intelligence

How Artificial Intelligence Accelerates Fiber Network Value  |  Fiber Broadband Association

Stories From Abroad

Research | Critical junctures in United Kingdom telecommunications policy  |  Telecommunications Policy
Today's Top Stories

News From the FCC

FCC Looks to Bring More Spectrum to Marketplace and Fund National Security

Press Release  |  Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission unanimously approved proposed rules to bring unused 5G-grade spectrum to market by taking the first step to reauction advanced wireless service (AWS)-3 spectrum licenses in the agency’s inventory. To lay the groundwork for this reauction, the FCC’s proposed rules would update the AWS-3 service rules to reflect legislative and regulatory developments since the spectrum was originally auctioned in 2014. The proceeds from this auction will fund the FCC’s national security initiative known as the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Reimbursement Program—more commonly known as “rip and replace”—which seeks to remove untrustworthy technology, like Huawei and ZTE equipment, from U.S. communications networks.

Broadband Funding

BEAD Program Targeting: A preliminary analysis

Hernan Galperin, François Bar  |  Research  |  USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism

This policy brief examines the targeting of the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program, a $42.45 billion federal initiative under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) aimed at expanding high-speed internet access the United States. The analysis links state-designated BEAD-eligible locations to key demographic indicators, focusing on “BEAD clusters” – census block groups where at least half of broadband-serviceable locations qualify for funding. The goal is to examine whether BEAD state plans are directing resources to the areas and populations in most need of support for broadband connectivity. Overall, the results suggest that BEAD will primarily benefit low population density areas where adoption of high-speed broadband is lagging, with limited expected impacts in other areas. A particularly important finding is that, after controlling for other demographic factors, the share of households in poverty is not correlated with priority BEAD areas in plans submitted to the NTIA. This finding raises concerns about whether BEAD will meet its mandate of reducing income-based disparities in high-speed broadband access. At the same time, the findings also point to vast differences in program targeting across states, suggesting that these impacts will be highly dependent on local contexts.

Delaying the 5G Fund?

Doug Dawson  |  Analysis  |  CCG Consulting

Small wireless carriers are asking the Federal Communications Commission to delay the implementation of the 5G Fund for Rural America. This new funding mechanism was approved by the FCC in August 2024 and is aimed at improving rural 5G coverage. On January 13, a group of nine cellular carriers petitioned the FCC to delay the implementation of the 5G Fund. On February 6, the Competitive Carriers Association filed a Petition for Review in the U.S. District Court of Appeals for DC. These pleadings recognize that there was an earlier petition from the Rural Wireless Association (RWA) that described the inaccuracy of the FCC’s cellular maps. Most people are unaware that cellular carriers must report coverage to the FCC twice a year and that the data is included on the FCC’s National Broadband Map. RWA claims the data provided by cellular carriers to the FCC is highly inaccurate and thinks the FCC should clean up the mapping data before choosing areas that are eligible for federal funding. One would have hoped that the FCC would have learned a lesson from the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) about launching a funding plan based on poor mapping. But the August 24 vote to move forward is evidence that they didn’t learn that lesson.

Digital Inclusion

Digital Inclusion Bytes: Digital Skills – Using frameworks and skill lists

Nate Stone  |  Analysis  |  National Digital Inclusion Alliance

Digital skills frameworks and skill lists can be compared to the instruction you or others provide to better understand what levels and ranges of learning are being offered and achieved…and for users to recognize and celebrate their success! The challenge of articulating what basic digital skills training included and how to measure them at the program or population level led me to partner with Stacey Wedlake at the University of Washington to complete the research “Digital skill sets for diverse users: A comparison framework for curriculum and competencies.” Our report compared six frameworks and nine curricula used locally and internationally. This led to a list of ten skill categories. The skills category list is also provided in the NDIA The Digital Inclusion Program Manual. This has been further developed and used in the Digital Skills Library by WorldEd. This is the second of a two-part blog post on digital skills by the National Digital Inclusion Allaince (NDIA). The first part presented a model to use for digital skill learning purposes, the link between individual and broader field needs, and introduced digital skill assessments, lists and frameworks. Part two explores the available frameworks and skill lists, how to use them, and digital literacy definitions.

For Southeast Ohio’s Digital Navigator, Every Day is a Good Day

Kristi Zappie-Ferradino  |  National Digital Inclusion Alliance

“The difference between opportunity and frustration often comes down to a simple digital connection,” said Abby Russell. Abby serves as the digital navigator for Hocking Athens Perry Community Action (HAPCAP), an organization selected by the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) to develop a National Digital Navigator Corps program. Along with support from a Google grant, the hiring of community-based resources in rural areas like Abby is possible. In Appalachian Southeast Ohio, where broadband access is often sparse, and computer skills are critical, Abby spends her days helping residents become more familiar with technology and enhance their digital skills. Abby’s work reshapes how residents can connect to resources, family, essential services, and opportunities. Here, reliable internet can be hard to find and often expensive. Simply getting online is a significant hurdle, and many county services require online accounts to access benefits. As a community-based resource, Abby is here to help. 

Local Initiatives

Internet is slow on Beaver Island, Michigan, but a rural grant could help

Sheri McWhirter  |  MLive

Internet connections on Beaver Island (MI) can be hit or miss, and it often depends on whether you can get a cell signal. For years, residents of remote Beaver Island more than 30 miles offshore from the mainland in northern Lake Michigan have said they want better internet access. They specifically want fiber-optic connections to every home, business, and community gathering place. That destination is becoming visible on the horizon. Michigan state officials recently announced a state rural readiness grant for the nonprofit Beaver Island Association to plot a course to extend broadband internet across the community, confirm build-out costs, and establish a township-owned system to provide high-speed internet service. A $43,000 grant to Beaver Island was among $1.3 million in Michigan rural readiness grants announced by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI). Those funds are intended to help rural communities build capacity, drive economic development and improve quality of life for residents.

Policymakers

Broadband Priorities of New House Communications Subcommittee Democrats

Zoë Walker  |  Analysis  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Over the past few weeks, we’ve been looking at the key Members of Congress who will driving policy for electronic communications—including voice, video, audio and data; emergency and public safety communications; cybersecurity, privacy, and data security; the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). Previously we looked at the Republican leadership of the House Commerce Committee, and the priorities of the Republican members of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology. Here, we look at the broadband priorities of the Democratic subcommittee members.

Submit a Story

Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.


© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2024. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org


Kevin Taglang

Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

Share this edition:

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society Benton Institute for Broadband & Society Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024